Obama and G-20 not Socialist Enough for the Left?

2010 June 29

by Lisa Richards

Has the Messiah Finally Crucified Himself?

2010 June 21

by Lisa Richards

Obama Uses BP Oil Spill to Demonize Drilling and Push Environmentalism

By Lisa Richards

June 16, 2010

What better excuse could leftists have to say drilling for oil is dangerous and must stop than a disastrous oil spill spewing tens of thousands of gallons of oil into the ocean?

Barry Obama is using the Gulf Coast BP oil spill to push his environmental plans to prevent America from drilling for oil: the Gulf Coast wetlands are doused in oil, animals are covered in crude, oil is drifting across the Gulf from Louisiana to Florida, destroying the fishing industry, beaches and tourism.

Obama used his June 15, 2010 Oval Office speech for one reason only: push alternative energy.  He demanded alternate reserves be found and implemented, stating he will only look at substitutes “as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels,” further saying “…we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude” [in the Gulf]…We cannot consign our children to this future…the time to embrace a clean energy future is now…Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us…Only if we seize the moment.  And only if we rally together and act as one nation…”

In other words, Obama has no intentions of allowing drilling anywhere in, or off shore, the United States as long as he is president and can forcefully attempt cap and trade. 

He will however continue spending $1 billion per day on foreign oil while hammering environmental agendas: “The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now.  I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy, because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.”

The speech was the leftist environmental political agenda: control how Americans fuel homes, cars, use water, banning chemicals, etc. 

To push this plan, Obama utilized coastal devastation to pull the heartstrings: “[W]e have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife.  And sadly, no matter how effective our response is, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done.” 

The community organizer never recognized the need for burning oil off the water before if washed into wetlands.  He never said yes to building barriers around coastal wetlands Gulf Coast governors begged for and Obama now declares he will install.

Fear not, the Messiah will punish BP for environmental incompetency: “[M]ake no mistake.  We will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes.  We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused.  And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.”

BP caused the disaster, but Obama’s speech was nothing more than environmental politics pushing for a green America: Obama “Already…issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling,” because he wants drilling stopped, oil companies punished for their wealth, shareholders and investors penalized, and Americans disciplined for using oil.  The best excuse to push leftist environmental regulations is the BP spill.

Lisa Richards Copyright ©™ June 16, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Obama, Does Islam Still Have a Place in America?

2010 May 10

by Lisa Richards

Islamic View of non-Muslims

After forbidding terrorist labels (unless describing tea partiers and Christians), Obama’s administration admits the Taliban was involved with the Times Square bomber’s assault, and perhaps Miranda rights should have been withheld.

The problem is Obama denounced the phrases “War on Terror” and “Radical Islam,” favoring leftist rhetoric that endangers America.

Anti-West leftists who worship Che Guevara and extol Bill Ayers never want to insult those trying to blow up the world.  It would be intolerant.

Political correctness has allowed Islamic terror: the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, 9/11, LAX, the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, murdering American military abroad at Khobar Towers, Kenya, Tanzania, Philippines, Mogadishu, Beirut, U.S.S. Cole, the Shoe Bomber, Arafat’s plane hijackings, Saddam ignoring 17 UN Resolutions, and Nidal Malik Hasan, the Muslim jihadist serving in the U.S. military who murdered 13 Fort Hood soldiers.

In June 2007, Obama declared:

Whatever we [America] once were, we’re no longer a Christian nation … We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.

According to Gallup polls, 71% of America is Christian.  Just 3% are Muslim.

Obama dodged facts in his Inaugural Address:

… to the Muslim world, we [America] seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect.

America and Islam do not have mutual interests, America is hated by the religion intent on annihilating the world.

What can one expect from a man who needs George Stephanopoulos to tell him which faith he follows?

In 2009, Obama repeated his anti-Christian views to Islamic Turkey:

Although we [America] have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation.

History proves otherwise.

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch disproves Obama’s remarks with historical facts:

Were there Muslims along Paul Revere’s ride, or standing next to Patrick Henry when he proclaimed, ‘Give me liberty or give me death’?  Where [sic] there Muslims among the framers or signers of the Declaration of Independence, which states that all men—not just Muslims, as Islamic law would have it—are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?  Were there Muslims among those who drafted the Constitution and vigorously debated its provisions, or among those who enumerated the Bill of Rights, which guarantees—again in contradiction to the tenets of Islamic law—that there should be no established national religion, and that the freedom of speech should not be infringed?

The answer is no.

Robert Spencer illustrates Islamic beliefs and practices in “Islam 101″ by quoting Sura 9:5, the “Verse of the Sword”:

… then kill the Mushrikun {unbelievers} wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush …

Sura 9:29 demands:

Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Leftists purposely rationalize Islam in order to rid America of Christianity, but Islam is entirely radical, denying free-thinking, even to Muslims. Islam denies liberty to choose anything but Islam and Allah.  That is not freedom, that is death.

You’ve Made Enough Money; Now Spread it Around and Share the Wealth with the Poor Government

2010 May 4

by Lisa Richards

It Took 234 Years, But Finally, America Has A Socialist President:

Too Bad Jimmy Carter’s Friends Didn’t Blow Up Washington…

(Pt Two Comparing Democrat Social Health Plans to Free-Market Capitalism)

By Lisa Richards

April 12, 2010

“[I]f people would hold fast to their rights, nothing, they say, would be superior in power, liberty, or happiness, inasmuch as they would be in charge of laws, courts, war, peace, treaties, individual lives, and wealth…this form of government is the only one that deserves the name ‘republic.’”

Scipio, “A Defense of Democracy”

From Cicero, The Republic The Laws

In 1776, the Founders signed the Declaration of Independence, abolishing all political ties to Great Britain, tyranny, and the King, freeing the American people by creating a new nation, a republic: “WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the right if the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

That same year, British economist Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations, a free-market economic guidebook that changed the world and America’s monetary outlook forever: “When law prohibits interest [money growth] altogether, it does not prevent it.  Many people must borrow, and nobody will lend without such a consideration for the use of their money as is suitable, not only to what can be made by use of it, but to the difficulty and danger of evading the law (Book One, Chapter IX).”

In other words, when government confiscates individual liberties belonging to people, inhibiting private creativity that produces personal prosperity and private property, people will devise ways to hide their money and investments in order to hold on to what they worked hard for: freedom of personal accomplishments.

Government involvement in personal wealth always creates failure, never prosperity.  Government participation in private property does not provide adequate housing or jobs, rather impoverished neighborhoods filled with crime due to resentment caused by disallowance of creativity, or, in the case of the so-called perfect society of Sweden, where government-subsidized homes are perfectly manicured, a ten-plus year waiting list for Swedes to own or rent apartments.  This is the ideal society in the minds of liberal Democrats. 

This is not what America’s Founders or Adam Smith considered liberty and wealth.  Smith noted, “Money, therefore, is the great wheel of circulation, the great instrument of commerce (Book II, Chapter II).”  Without money jobs are nonexistent, property ownership perishes, and people subsist only through government subsidies.

Capitalism generates personal freedom; in a republic form of government, liberty to create one’s way of life as one sees fit for one’s self and family without government control over profits and wages. This is the only standard form of government that worked 234 years-ago and the only elemental principle that ever succeeds.

Change from free-market to collective enclave began with the induction of the Federal Reserve, the IRS, and presidents Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and FDR: three progressives, i.e. socialists, who devised ways to control the amount Americans earned and spent.  True investment in one’s future ended with the Federal Reserve and was further wrecked in 1913 with the IRS.  FDR worsened every American life with the New Deal, allowing government to confiscate large percentages of every American earner’s wages, conning the belief that income tax actually created trusts funds.

Only Mommy and Daddy can do that for you darlings.

In The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke wrote “Of Property” “…that men being once born have a right to their preservation [one’s personal maintenance and continuation of one’s own personal life-style]…God, who hath given the world to men in common, hath also given them reason [know-how, talent] to make use of it to the best advantage of life and convenience.  The earth and all that is therein is given to men for the support and comfort of their being.”

God created man free, God gave the earth to man to take care of and use for individual need.  Liberals do not want man making his own way by personal choice and thought, they want mankind controlled by government, which seizes and makes use of that which government did not earn or create, nor has a right to take.  Obama follows this belief. 

In February of 2009, the New York Times wrote that the Obama “Administration officials said Mr. Obama would propose to reduce the value of itemized tax deductions for everyone in the top income tax bracket, 35 percent, and many of those in the 33 percent bracket—roughly speaking, starting at $250,000 in annual income for a married couple.”  $250,000 dollar earners are small business owners, employers.  Removing tax deductions from employers destroys businesses and jobs.

No one should be shocked, after all, on February 15, 2008, Alan Reynolds of the Cato Institute reported what Obama and Hillary Clinton both campaigned on: tax hikes on the upper and middle-class.

On February 1, 2010, Politics Daily reported Obama intends to phase out the Bush tax-cuts on the upper and middle-class: “First, [Obama] will allow the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire as scheduled for families that make at least $250,000 (or individuals who make at least $200,000)…return[ing] the top two income tax rates to the 39.6 percent and 36 percent rates that existed in 2000…these same families would now pay a 20 percent rather than a 15 percent rate on dividends and capital gains.  Finally, the administration seeks to reinstate the personal exemption phase-out that existed before the 2001 tax cut and to limit the rate at which these taxpayers can take itemized deductions to a maximum of 28 percent, rather than at the relevant income tax rate, which would be 36 percent or 39.6 percent.”

Locke was correct when he wrote “For he that thinks absolute power purifies men’s blood, and corrects the baseness of human nature, need read but the history of this or any age, to be convicted of the contrary (Of Political or Civil Society).”  Government does not correct wrongs, it intersperses error while accumulating immense deficits heaped upon the citizens who toil for everything they own.

Two weeks-ago, Obama exceeded Jimmy Carter’s socialism by announcing he wants the European-style Value Added Tax.  In Europe, the VAT is a 25% tax on everything.  Obama wants VAT added to America’s $8 trillion, creating $12 trillion more in deficits this coming decade.  The idea; create a new entitlement class. 

Absolute power with a blood vengeance would be a more correct analogy.

No person has ever become wealthy through welfare.  No person living in housing projects, accepting government hand-outs, generates wealth and lives in affluence.  Government does not produce or generate wealth; it takes from the earners, divides profits, spreading it to those convinced not to work, never get educations and better themselves.  Such ideology is slavery and the only way those in power can become pseudo-monarchs and the people their surfs.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ April 12, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

It Took 234 Years, But Finally, Mass Murdering Dictators Love America:

If Only FDR Was Able To Make Hitler Love America…

(Pt One Comparing Democrat Social Health Plans to Free-Market Capitalism)

By Lisa Richards

April 6, 2010

“We consider health reform to have been an important battle and a success of his (Obama’s) government.  It is really incredible that 234 years after the Declaration of Independence...the government of that country has approved medical attention for the majority of its citizens, something that Cuba was able to do half a century ago.”

Fidel Castro

March 25, 2010

234 years after America’s founding, Americans finally have the privilege of being approved by concentration camp dictators.  America can thank the fifth socialist U.S. president (first came Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and then Jimmy Carter) for changing America from a free-market republic to collectivist state the four presidents listed above were unable to completely achieve during their parliamentary-style reign: Barak Obama.

Obama has the pleasure of being praised by Cuban sociopath Castro, who called Obama a “miracle” worker, able to stop the “mercenaries,” i.e. capitalists, conservatives, Republicans, and anyone supporting liberty, from preventing the Healthcare Bill from passing and being signed into law.

What a shame Bush didn’t ignore that little September 11 incident as just a bit of offensive resentment reprisal on the part of Osama bin Laden, Bush could have received the Nobel Peace Prize and Jihadists would swiftly adore America.   

Thanks to Barry Obama, virgin vigilantes have free reign in America while those they hate are over taxed by Obama’s pseudo-frozen government spending melting the economy like menopausal global warming.

234 years after America signed the document of liberty, one man and his Messianic mafia have single-handily thrown the nation back to the Red Coats, who themselves, are screaming to be rid of socialism.

According to Obama’s health care plan, 32 million uninsured Americans will receive affordable healthcare.  The number of illegal aliens in the U.S. is roughly 30 million, so who are the recipients of healthcare?  Obamacare includes amnesty to illegals, which means those 30 million illegals will be eligible for affordable insurance, i.e. tax-funded, after becoming citizens without ever having worked for the title. 

Union bosses should be thrilled they can add 30 million more high paid, tax-funded workers to their mobs.

According to the Cato Institute, Obama’s 32 million numbers is false: [W]hether you use the president’s noncitizen-free estimate or the standard, questionable estimate of 46 million uninsured residents.  A study prepared for the federal government estimates that 9 million people counted as ‘uninsured’ in the standard estimate are in fact enrolled in Medicaid. The left-leaning Urban Institute estimates that 12 million are eligible but not enrolled, meaning they could get coverage at any time.  Health economists Mark Pauly of the University of Pennsylvania and Kate Bundorf of Stanford estimate that one quarter to three quarters of the uninsured can afford to purchase coverage, but choose not to do so.”

That is called individuality on the part of each American to decide whether or not they want insurance or pay by cash.

The White House further declares the new healthcare is “competitive,” giving every American “the same choices of insurance that members of congress will have.”  If by that Obama means paid for by the taxpayers, then he is correct.  However, every American knows they will never receive the health care plan of a Washington politician without becoming one.  So the question should be; will Senate and House leaders toss out their coverage for lousy compulsory insurance?

The new health care plan will cost “more than $1 trillion over the second decade, by cutting government overspending and reigning in waste, fraud, and abuse.”   I feel so much better knowing that my taxes will not be hiked to pay off another trillion dollars until the beginning of the second decade.  The White House calls this government spending of $1 trillion an economic plan for recovery.  

Cato writers Michael F. Cannon and Ramesh Ponnuru dispel Obama’s myths, stating: “It is true that individual insurance policies are generally 30 percent less comprehensive than employer-provided insurance, and comparable individual policies are about twice as expensive.  But much of the extra cost is a function of the tax penalty on purchasing such insurance and the stunted market that penalty has yielded.”  In other words, tax-hikes are controlling our individual health choices in order to grow the government larger in order to spend more on pet pork projects in order to attain votes every election.

Cato further renders Obama’s claims as the lies they are: “Obama contradicts that basic truth.  Employers aren’t forcing their employees to pick up a larger share of the bill because they can’t.  Workers are already paying the entire bill.”  1913 gave America something called the IRS and with it came many taxes including income tax and the government stealing a portion of earner’s weekly paychecks to fund the government.

America will spend another $1 trillion to pay off seven trillion in choices owed to China.  

According to the anti-obesity, chain smoking president, his plan makes insurance companies accountable to Americans by preventing insurance companies from denial abuse: “It will end discrimination against Americans with pre-existing conditions.”  Unless one is a fat chain smoker predetermined to acquire diabetes. 

None of the evidence rejecting Obamacare’s allegorical fairy tale of Utopian medical attention seemed to matter to him or Democrats embraced by Cuban tyrants whom liberals insist have the best health care in the world.  If liberals mean only Castro fat-cat supporters receive excellent medical attention, than liberals are correct.  Outside of Cuban tourist areas, Cuba is not Palm Beach and the people are fully equal in their despotic poverty.  But at least every Cuban has the pleasure of saying they own 1950’s Cadillac’s.  Their Cadi’s are government owned because the people are enslaved.  The Cuban GM role model.

As noted above, the only winning beneficiary to Obama’s health care plan are unions who will make fortunes hiring illegals-turned-legal.  That alone will drive up costs on everything produced and put America out of business.  But isn’t that the idea: take down America, capitalism, the free market, and destroy every vestige of liberty until Americans become compliant slaves without a clue to the Constitution’s truths: Natural Law.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ April 6, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Obama and His Healthcare Bill:

A Blessing In Disguise for the Democrat Party Demise

By Lisa Richards

March 27, 2010

Americans will be convinced they will never worry about health again;   Americans will be influenced into believing medical treatment is now free of charge and no American will ever suffer needlessly without medical treatment.  Americans have been told by Barry Obama that healthcare is “the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care.”  Essentially Obama claims healthcare is a constitutional right despite the fact it is not.  Soon everyone will find out just how many rights they have lost under Barry Obama and the Democrat Party.

Fear, not, all will have the privilege of being socially justified.

On March 23, 2010, Obama declared: “Today we are affirming that essential truth, a truth every generation is called to rediscover for itself, that we are not a nation that scales back its aspirations.”  That claim is true: America does not “scale back” on individual “aspirations,” the Founders believed all are capable of working to achieve personal dreams without government scaling back natural liberties.  Obama however did exactly that by signing a socialist bill forcing Americans into compliance or face fines for continuing to live as free-thinking individuals with personal ambitions.  

The Messiah declared: we Americans wonder “…if there are limits to what we as a people can still achieve,” claiming the massive healthcare bill will help Americans achieve freedom because “we are a nation that does what is hard, what is necessary, what is right... [and the healthcare bill represents the] “...core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their healthcare.”  Again, healthcare is not a constitutional right; the security provided in the Constitution is liberty, providing all to achieve their dreams individually.  The Constitution does not provide social equality.  America is not the EU; America is a free-market society of character choice, not government collectivism.

Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution will Americans find rights to healthcare, education, and jobs, those particular privileges fall under the Constitution’s preamble that states “We the people of the United States…secure (make safe, are assured) the Blessings of Liberty (independence) to ourselves and our Posterity (future generations)…” 

Obama announced: “After a century of striving, after a year of debate, after a historic vote, health care reform is no longer an unmet promise, it is the law of the land.”

Not according to Article III Section. 2. “The judicial Power shall extend (reach and offer) to all Cases, in Law and Equity (evenhandedness, fair play), arising under this Constitution…”

Nowhere in Article I does the legislature have the power to make or mandate healthcare provisions, nor is healthcare a law under Article I. or right in any Constitutional Amendment.  Americans are free to choose their own way, even if they go broke doing so.

Americans have, under the First Amendment, rights to Free Speech, giving all right to say NO to healthcare, as well as rights “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” i.e., demand reparations to the objections and unfair treatment and unjust damages the legislature and president have executed and must, under Constitutional law, rectify.

As a result, trail lawsuits are beginning, challenging the bill, that 49% of the people of Iowa alone, have demanded be removed.  13 GOP State Attorney Generals have filed lawsuits against Obama’s heavy handedness that broke Amendment IV: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”  Obamacare is unconstitutional, mandating all Americans be forced to purchase healthcare or face heavy fines enforced by 16,000 soon-to-be-hired IRS (another illegal law office) agents, who, under the bill, are to keep tabs every American. 

Joseph Stalin would have loved America.

The healthcare bill contains so many pages; the President of the United States admitted to Fox News’s Brett Baier: he does not know everything contained in his bill. “[B]y the time the vote has taken place, not only I will know what’s in it [the bill], you’ll [Brett Baier] know what’s in it because it’s going to be posted and everybody’s going to be able to able to evaluate it on the merits.”  

Knowing the president has no clue about his own policies and bills makes me feel very secure in my person.

Obama told Baier “I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or the Senate.”  The American people do, and they want their Life, Liberty, and their individual, promised Pursuit of Happiness, not denied as Obama and the Democrats have done.

According to Barry Obama, Americans with medical Preconditions will receive treatment under Obamacare.  A precondition technically means qualification, so unless one is eligible for medical attention, entitled to receive medical attention can be denied.  Those over 65 certainly do not “qualify.”  They are too old and unfit to meet Obamcare’s criterion of a satisfactory healthy age: young.  A fetus however is too young.

After signing the bill, Obama slapped the American people and his opponents by declaring Republicans are “still making a lot of noise” over the bill: “I heard one of the Republican leaders say this was going to be Armageddon.  Well, two months from now, six months from now, you can check it out.  We’ll look around and we’ll see.”

Obama knows he will most likely be voted out of office in 2012, never seeing a second term, therefore, it was necessary to enact a weapon of law against the people, fundamentally changing the face of the nation into socialism before November elections.  

The Messiah is not blind or ignorant, he knows every law placed inside his bill he fought the majority of the people over for one year; Obama put up enormous, egotistical unconstitutional fights against the people’s will and their First, IV and IX Amendment Rights. 

Obama has proved he lacks all care and concern for America, and the feelings, opinions, and will of self-governed voters, who, have the power to elect and remove every unfit leader from power.

Enacting legislation against the wishes of the people forces Americans to get even: taking leaders down through the voting system the Founders provided as a weapon against government attempting tyrannical acts. 

This present administration, as well as the Democrat Party and the GOP RINO’s, have taken constitutional liberties, using them against Americans for power.  The people have awakened and will get even in November.

Obamacare may be signed into law, but this is the end of the Democrat Party.  November will see the removal of modern-day Democrat autocrats who abused leadership for life-term power. 

So yes Barry, we shall see a battle of voting force, judging Democrats with a Revelation: the end of their modern-day party.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ March 27, 2010 All Right Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Obama Wants To Crucify Healthcare on Resurrection Sunday

By Lisa Richards

March 9, 2009

The presidential Messiah has been an unsuccessful god: he can’t raise the dead or heal the sick he could care less about, except when it comes to vote-grabbing from poor minorities and the elderly he and House Democrats love to scare to death.  His Holy Spirit-helper is a Teleprompter whose rhetoric is worse than a satanic desert temptation, and this Messiah has an obsession with force-fed pork.  

Christians need not fear, Obama is not the anti-Christ.  The devil is too intelligent to use a Teleprompter to speak his evil plans, and he would not use government-run healthcare and a face-lifted Congressional actress to take over the world. 

If Obama’s moronic Messianic moves aren’t bad enough, he wants Obamacare, which, according to House Blue Dogs and Republicans contains tax-funded abortion, passed into law by Easter Sunday 2010.  

Obama is attempting to use a tactic known as “Reconciliation” to force his bill through the House.  “Reconciliation” is the method politicians use to ram legislation into law with 51 votes versus the usual 60 vote rule.  This form of law is nothing more than phony appeasement.  The reason for using the “Reconciliation” ploy is one side cannot force the other to give into something dangerous to the American people, therefore, force the bill on the people by ramming it through to law.

Now Easter Sunday is being used to “Reconcile” laws Americans overwhelmingly say they do not want: a bill sneaking abortion into America’s taxes.  Obama does not care, nor is he interested in listening to the people he refuses to serve.  He prefers leading Americans to a crucifixion that won’t raise their quality of life.  It will however raise America’s taxes and drive people into bankruptcy.

According to Barry O, “Every idea has been put on the table; every argument has been made, so now is the time to make a decision about how to finally reform health care so that it works, not just for the insurance companies, but for America’s families and businesses.”

Republican ideas have not been allowed to make it to the table, since Republicans are barred from the Roosevelt Room’s closed door sessions.

Senator Mitch said “They’re [Obama and the Democrats] making a vigorous effort to try to jam this down the throats of the American people, who don’t want it.  We think that’s a policy mistake, and we think resorting to these kinds of tactics, to thumb your nose at the American people, is something that ought to be resisted.”

John Goodman states in his column for the  Library of Economics and Liberty “The most serious defects of Obamacare were never discussed at the Health Care Summit or in the President’s speech [on healthcare]…I blame the Republicans…as a result, things have gotten worse for the GOP.  President Obama is now offering to make minor concessions on the issues the Republicans did bring up and call the whole effort a ‘bipartisan compromise.’”

Obama however is not compromising, insisting American insurance companies cannot cover Americans, and Americans need the government to take care of them.

Is healthcare so damaged that it actually needs to be resurrected into a new life form?  According to Mark V. Pauly, Bendheim member of the Hoover Institution’s Working Group on Health Care Policy and Professor for the Department of Health Care Systems at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, “While there surely are some serious deficiencies in today’s individual insurance market, the current criticisms are overly harsh, often based on anecdote and speculation, and ignore some important advantages in this market that should be preserved.” 

Pauly’s latest book titled Health Reform Without Side Effects: Making Markets Work For Individual Health Insurance, states that the government plans for insurance attempt to make private insurance providers appear harmful.  This, Pauly says, is the serious “side effect” of healthcare reform, because, although insurance companies do need improvement, they can be repaired, and the government should not try to prevent enhancing private insurers.  It’s best to fix them, upgrade them, and the system itself can turn around without government interference.

Economist and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute Thomas Sowell states in his latest column “Getting Out Of Medicine,” that today’s doctors are not excited about practicing and healing.  Patients no longer visit doctors because they trust individual doctors, rather, because they are given a list of doctors by insurance companies from which to choose from.  Patients no longer decide which doctor they want treating them and doctors no longer are allowed to decide upon treatment; insurance companies make the decisions about healthcare.

The L.A. Times reporter Peter Nicolas reported in his column “Obama Adds Fire To Healthcare Debate:” “Obama said that Washington pundits obsessed with analyzing the political repercussions of a yes or no vote on healthcare are distracting lawmakers from what’s fundamentally at stake: If Congress fails to act, the president said, premiums will rise, insurers will deny coverage based on preexisting conditions and more people will be without insurance.”

Goodman says “In 2016, Obamacare will require almost everyone to have insurance that costs an estimated $15,000 for a family…Obamacare would create marginal tax rates in excess of 60% for workers earning as little as $25,000!”

Americans making $25,000 per year are low-income.  This sounds more like an Easer egg hunt for rotten eggs. 

The strong-arming was unleashed yesterday at Pennsylvania’s Arcadia University when Obama declared the time for talking was over.  There has yet to be a time for discussions, Republicans have been banned from the secret backroom healthcare talks.  As far as the Messiah is concerned, he’s not interested in discussions: “They [Republicans and Blue Dogs] will keep doing this for as long as they can get away with it.  How many more Americans have to lose their health insurance? …. When is the right time for health insurance reform…I’ll be honest with you, I don’t know how passing health care will play politically, but I do know it’s the right thing to do!  It’s right for our families, it’s right for our businesses, it’s right for the United States of America, and if you share that belief, I want you to stand with me and fight!”

How can the lame stand when the Messiah has kicked their crutches out from under them and hurled them under the crucifixion bus?

Obama insists Americans [N]need to hear your [Arcadia University] voices because right now the Washington echo chamber is in full throttle.  It is as deafening as it’s ever been. And as we come to that final vote, that echo chamber is telling members of Congress, wait, think about the politics, instead of thinking about doing the right thing.”

It is Americans who want to think, act, and do for themselves and Obama who wishes to destroy that Constitutional idea.  If possible, he wants Resurrection Sunday to be Armageddon.

By Lisa Richards Copyright©™ March 9, 2009 all Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Wanted, MP Daniel Hannan;

Job Offer: U.S. President.

No Need For Birth Certificate; You’re Love of Liberty is the Best Resume’

By Lisa Richards

March 2, 2010

According to the U.S. Constitution, foreign born Americans cannot become president, but in the case of Daniel Hannan, I would definitely make an exception to the Constitution Rule.

I’m sure “birthers” reading this are screaming “wake up, we have a foreign born president!”  Since Barry Obama refuses to show the original hard copy birth certificate, I cannot prove where the Messiah of Marxism was born, but it definitely was not a stable.

Obama’s birthplace is the least of our problems, his Marxist-style policies are what America should truly worry about.  So enough on that; let’s move on to a man I consider a true patriot: Britain’s conservative Member of Parliament and the man who started Britain’s first Tea Party: Daniel Hannan.

On April 13, 2009, Daniel Hannon told Fox News’s Sean Hannity he considers himself “[A] friend of this [America] country and I wish it well…because…what’s bad for America is bad for Britain and bad for the free world.”

Hannan further stated “[T]he American state is expanding so much because of the stimulus and the bailouts and the nationalizations…”  Hannon believes this type of policy is dangerous, not only to America, but to the UK and the rest of the world, because, it collapses economies.

 Hannon sees America and the UK becoming “impoverished,” without any credit if both countries continue down the path of big government control.  Hannon said once a country becomes socialist, it is difficult to turn things around back to the free-market system. “How amazing to me that a free [American] people…citizens of a country founded on the principle of independence, independence for the citizen as well as independence for the state, should be contemplating…burdening themselves with a system like this [socialism], which puts the power of life and death in a state bureaucracy.”

As to power, Hannon told Hannity: “I’m an elected legislator…And no politician can ever afford to forget what his constituents think about things.”

Can we trade Obama for Hannan?

Daniel Hannon believes in liberty, tax-cuts, private property ownership, and small government; this guy is not a socialist; he is against collectivism that has controlled his country for decades, driving the UK into the grave from the welfare cradle. 

Hannon is a conservative ala’ Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher; Great Britain’s Tea Party guy just may be Great Britain’s Ronald Reagan.  

We Americans somehow have the dumber version of Neville Chamberlain.

Last week Hannon sent out a notice to all Brits in London’s Telegraph: “Labour has raised more than a trillion pounds in additional taxation since 1997.  Yet, unbelievably, Gordon Brown has still managed to run up a deficit of 12.6 per cent of GDP (Greece’s is 12.7 per cent).  A far lower level of taxation brought Americans out in spontaneous protest last year.  If you happen to be coming to the Conservative Spring Conference, do please pop in: the Tea Party is five minutes’ walk from the conference venue.  It is, however, outside the security zone, and anyone is welcome to come.  Oh, and this being England, we’ll be serving actual, you know, tea.”

The British showed up, in the pouring rain, protesting their socialist government taking their rights to live free without government interference they have allowed for too long.  Now Britain is fighting back against what American liberals want: socialism. 

Who would have thought the British would scream The British Are Coming!

Daniel darling, if you ever want to leave Great Britain, we Yanks would love to have a president who believes in liberty and keeping government out of our lives.  We haven’t seen that since Ronald Reagan.  America truly misses having a real man in the Oval Office versus the petticoats in man’s drag we’ve had for 22 years.

American liberals are in a tizzy over the fact a British MP would be so brazen as to abhor taxes and government healthcare.   The Huffington Post huffed in horror: “The Brighton Tea Party,” as the event is known, is backed by the Freedom Association, a libertarian group that counts Hannan as a member.  The American Tea Party movement has sent out an email promoting the British Tea Party...In addition to being anti-tax and a vocal Eurospectic, Hannan is also well known for his outspoken criticism of publicly funded health care.  Last summer he appeared on Fox News to bash proposals to fix the US health care system as well as rail against Britain’s health services.”  Huffington Post further declared with appall: “In an interview with EUObserver…Hannan said he believes the Tea Party movement could have ‘enormous resonance across the EU.’”

Hannon said the EU and Great Britain “has taxation without representation,” unlike the U.S., who broke away from monarchy, declaring “No taxation without representation,” because Americans demand each state have legislature representing people’s choices. 

The liberals at Huff find Hannon repulsive for his wanting Brits to have American-style liberty.  I personally would love to have a president with a Teleprompter that has that view.

On February 10, 2010, Hannon wrote in the Telegraph; “Some of my US readers believe that anti-tax rebellions are an American specialty, but we’ve had plenty of them in this country, from the Poll Tax Riots of 1381 (the Peasants’ Revolt) to the Poll Tax Riots of 1990… [before the American War of Independence] the Seven Years War had pushed taxes up to 25 shillings a year for the average Englishman…and MPs were determined to export part of that cost to North America…Britain…has all the conditions necessary for a popular anti-tax movement.  Not only are levies high and rising; they are being imposed by rulers over whom we have no control.  We need our own Tea Party Movement.  Who will help me run one?”

America is fortunate to have leaders supporting the Tea Party movement: Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, and others lending their voices and fight for liberty.  

Marching against government control over American lives has led to conservatives rising up, answering to the call of leadership.  These men and women want the Constitution preserved and America restored, not changed.  Their courage is spreading across the nation and Atlantic.  America now has a Tea Party ally in Great Britain and MP Daniel Hannon: “I’m actually quite optimistic…this is a country [America] founded in the principle of small government, big individual…constrained power and free citizens…the idea that this, of all countries, could put into the power of a state bureaucracy decisions over what kind of medical treatment you get, literally whether you can live or die, is deeply un-American.”

Gordon Brown, if I were you, I would resign now.  Great Britain has just dumped you and your liberal Labour policies in the Thames.  

Lisa Richards Copyright ©™ March 2, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Why Bipartisanship is Just as Dangerous as Multiculturalism

By Lisa Richards

February 25, 2010

“Suppose we avoid redistribution by requiring each person to pay for the annuity[insurance] he gets…what justification is there then for requiring him to purchase it [annuity] from a governmental concern [program]…why not permit individuals who wish to do so to purchase their annuities from private concerns [insurance companies]?”

Milton Friedman

From Capitalism And Freedom, 1962

Today, February 25, 2010, President Obama held an alleged bipartisanship Healthcare Summit with House Democrats and Republicans concerning his government-run healthcare bill he wants rammed through the House and Senate with complete compliance from both parties.  I say alleged, because there is no desire in the hearts or minds from Democrats to work for or with Republicans or the American people.  Democrats, i.e. Progressives, have a history of ramming and cramming bills and laws—IRS, Federal Reserve—illegally into law under the noses of the American people they have kept blind for so long, many Americans believe government is supposed to take care of them and they are to follow whatever leaders say.

In that case, all must learn to lie, steal, cheat on their wives, and buy their government position in Chicago.

Strong-arming the people may have worked for Teddy Roosevelt, who forced corporations with threats of military action against them, if they did not unionize.  That tactic is no longer effective, nor is it brainwashing the minds of all Americans who are finally seeing the writing of their controlled health on the wall.

Americans refuse to be bull-moosed by a socialist story-teller demanding America convert to European-style politics and life-styles that have driven the EU into bankruptcy and ill-health.  The EU is proof bipartisanship, as well as multicultural ideas, destroys free will and sovereignty, further removing the personal liberties of people who elect politicians to office to serve the people, not dictate how people should live while catering to foreign cultures in order to gain votes. 

Bipartisanship demands lock-stepping to the direction of presidents and party leaders.  Bipartisanship does not serve the people through separate party competition; it wipes out competition between the two parties, removes ideas, replacing inspiration with limitations.  Bipartisanship creates one large bureaucracy of parliamentary-style leaders forbidden to disagree with the man in charge. 

Partisanship competition has a history of working.  It founded this nation.  

Bipartisanship, like multiculturalism, forces all to comply and accept that which removes the Constitution in favor of unnatural law: suppression.  Partisanship, in the same way as one culture living within one heritage, provides free-thinking, insists private liberties exist, create, and build a strong nation of individuals with choice.  The opposite generates chaos and animosity.

In his book Capitalism And Freedom, Milton Friedman discussed how the government controls American lives: “[T]he program known as old age and survivor’s insurance (OASI) consists of a special tax imposed on payrolls, plus payments to persons who have reached a specified age… 1. The requirement that a wide class of persons must purchase specified annuities, i.e. compulsory provision for old age.  2. The requirement that the annuity must be purchased from the government, i.e. Nationalization of the provision of these annuities.  3. A scheme for redistributing income …to which people are entitled when they enter the system…there is no necessity for these elements to be combined.  Each individual could be required to pay for his own annuity; the individual could be permitted to purchase an annuity form private firms…” 

Friedman further noted: “The subsidy to the beneficiaries is independent of their poverty or wealth; the man of means receives it as much as the indignant.  That tax which pays the subsidy is a flat-rate tax on earnings up to a minimum.  It constitutes a larger fraction of low incomes than high.  What conceivable justification is there for taxing the young to subsidize the old regardless of the economic status of the old…I see no grounds on which such a subsidy can be justified.” 

The phony bipartisan healthcare summit between Democrats and Republicans is not set up for healthcare access or Barry O would encourage Republicans and voters to demand legislators enact laws allowing citizens to obtain health insurance wherever they desire. 

Under the current bully system, Americans are forced to buy insurance in their own states, forbidden to purchase insurance across state lines.  Under the existing structure, as Friedman pointed out, Americans are obliged to pay each other’s way rather than being self-sufficient as the Founders intended and signed into law.

If Obamacare is passed, all Americans will be forced to acquire government-run healthcare insurance or face severe fines.  That is bipartisanship: all go along or face penalties.

House Republicans should have refused to appear at the “bipartisanship” summit.  Nothing will be gained, Obama will never agree to Americans having rights to their own bodies and healthcare providers unless it is to abort as many unborn children as possible while forcing the elderly to die in favor of treating the young. 

The grand-standing summit was a complete waste of time, set up for termaholics to be seen on TV.

If American doctors are not allowed to cure diseases, which scientists are prevented from actually discovering cures for, the answer to Obama’s summit ideas is the same-old-same-old: treat diseases with expensive drugs enriching pharmaceutical companies who do not desire to create cures.  Creating cures would save lives and bankrupt drug companies.  

Money is more valuable than human lives.

What makes any logical minded person assume this latest summit of manure will grant doctors rights to treat patients?  Who truly believes patients will be allowed to make their own decisions about treatments and doctors if Obama coerces “bipartisan” “cooperation?”

This is no different than multiculturalism demanding Americans learn to speak Spanish so illegals can take over America with foreign cultures Americans are expected to fall in line with or face being tagged racist.  If Republicans refuse Obama’s bipartisan healthcare ideas, they will be called inhumane leaders who want sick Americans to die.

It’s a shame dueling was outlawed.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ February 25, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Are We There Yet?

The Obama Speech Experience

By Lisa Richards

January 29, 2010

Listening to Barry Obama speak is like reliving those long childhood vacation drives up the Connecticut/Rhode Island coast to the ferry boat that would take my family out to the New England Islands for the summer.  The ride was boring for three active children who hated to sit still.   My brothers and I sat in the back seat of our family Town and Country Station Wagon incessantly whining “are we there yet?” to which my father would answer, every ten minutes, “ten more minutes.” 

Barry Obama makes me wonder if we’re there yet; but where; Sweden or Russia?  My father’s answer was intentionally sarcastic.  It was either the ten-more-minutes answer or dump three noisy kids off on the side of the road, fleeing with my mother to a place of peace and sanity.  Obama has no answers, he has plenty of ideas, Marxist schemes, but he can’t actually state his antagonism toward America and what he wants to do to Americans, so he must filibuster every speech, and question, he himself knows lacks all sense and reason.

Obama’s latest aggrandized filibuster in Baltimore, Maryland insists job growth and middle-class are on the rise and doing well.

As Amanda Reinecker of The Heritage Foundation points out in her latest column “The state of our union has been better:” “Even before President Obama delivered his State of the Union address on Wednesday, most lawmakers and most Americans already knew the current state of our union. To put it gently, it has been better.  President Obama has spent a year in office, without much to show for it—apart from a staggering economy, increased debt, weaker defense and foreign policies, and several costly big-government proposals that have stalled in the Congress.  His speech this week gave him the opportunity to present Congress and the American people with a fresh set of ideas for future.”

Obama further told House Republicans he cannot understand why they held back on a $300 billion dollar tax cut to the American people: “We have seen some party-line votes that have been disappointing.  I didn’t understand then, and I still don’t understand, why we got opposition in this caucus for almost $300 billion in badly needed tax cuts for the American people.  Let’s face it; some of you have been at the ribbon-cuttings for some of these important projects in your communities.”  This is Obama playing politics to the never-educated voters who believe he has an enormous money reserve.  Republicans refused a YES vote on the $300 billion “tax-cut” because it would not go to anyone but welfare, which includes illegal aliens on welfare.

Obama’s plan for America is Karl Marx in a Che Guevara T-shirt.  Chinese-made of course.

I must give Karl Marx credit: in all his books, essays, letters, manifestos, he never once attempted to hide his plans, beliefs, or hate for capitalism, free markets, free trade, private property, business, and self-government.  At least Marx had the guts to admit he wanted to destroy everything to do with personal ownership and place people under complete government control.  Obama follows those creeds, but he won’t admit them publically or his beloved flock would realize he intends on keeping them enslaved for life while he lives like a king.

Obama wants the lower and middle-class voters believing he is creating jobs and making the markets jump upward, when in fact the opposite continues happening.  Obama wants cap and trade, higher taxes on everything across the board, government controlled healthcare funding illegals and abortions, prohibiting women complete medical exams, restricting treatment to anyone over 65 and those with serious illnesses requiring immediate attention.

Obama used healthcare to smack Minority Leader John Boehner in the face for his House Floor stance last year against the Healthcare Bill: “If you listen to the American people, John, they’ll tell you they want their money back,” further telling Boehner the American people are “bitter and contentious” over the fact men like Boehner have not allowed healthcare to pass: “If anyone here truly believes our health insurance system is working well for people,” Obama purposely challenged in an attempt to sound Reaganesque, “I respect your right to say so, but I don’t agree.”

The only people, who would benefit from anything Obama passes, if Republicans and Blue Dogs are foolish enough to allow his bills to pass, are welfare recipients.  The American people know this, which is why millions are marching in Tea Parties.

Obama says he is “not giving up on passing healthcare reform.”  But he does pass the blame onto others for how the healthcare bill is structured.  Apparently the president has no idea what is in the bill he, Pelosi and Reid, created.  Neither do Republicans, nor the people, something Obama swore wouldn’t happen in his administration: closed door sessions and bookroom deals.  

Obama claims, however, that he wants to work with Republicans, whom he wants to “challenge my ideas.”   He believes “Having differences of opinion, having a real debate about matters of domestic policy and national security, that’s something that’s not only good for our country, it’s absolutely essential.”

What is essential is partisanship, not bi-partisanship, but competition between the two parties, not sharing ideas, not working together, or the two parties simply become one in ideology, something the Founders did not want.  But Obama insists Republicans must come to the Democrat table, finding a compromise, because “Americans didn’t send us to Washington to fight each other in some political steel cage match, [they did not elect us] to continue being so Washington-like.”

Americans have two parties because they want two parties to fight for different beliefs and policies.  We the people want leaders duking it out in a political steel cage, not playing nice and compromising the beliefs and will of the people.

Still, Obama pulled out all stops, appearing beaten down by those he so desires to be friends with and work with for the betterment of his beloved America: “Just think about it for a while; we don’t have to put it up for a vote today.”  In other words, Obama’s trying, but evil Republicans care more about America, free-trade, free-markets, liberty, private property, business creation, tax-cuts, capitalism, and that rotten Constitution getting in Obama’s way, preventing him from giving away 100% of hard-earned money to those living off the American taxpayer.

We’re not there yet, and never will be, if Americans fight the Marxist and Chief and continue electing more conservatives by rejecting all modern-day liberals, i.e. progressives.

Again, this was another long, drawn out are-we-there-yet speech declaring so much ado about nothing.  This Baltimore spectacle made the British look intelligent in comparison. 

The last two days of speeches should make Christ Matthews “almost forget Obama is” a Marxist.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ January 29, 2010 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com©™

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com©™

State Of Hopeful Devastation And Deficient Surplus

By Lisa Richards

January 28, 2010

According to Salon.com’s Joan Walsh, Barry Obama’s first State of the Union Address was his best speech so far and finally showed Obama has “spine.”  If last night was Obama’s best, I would hate to see the worse.  There is not enough Lithium and Thorzine in America’s mental institutions to cope with that kind of traumatic experience.

Last night’s State of the Union was one hour and twenty-minutes of wind-bagging boredom by an intellect who said everything and nothing, while making constant contradictions lacking any form of astuteness Obama is supposed to posses in vast amounts. 

If Andrew Jackson were a live, he would have shot himself in the head just to be put out of the misery one droning moron put the country through while blaming George W. Bush and the Republicans for the Wall Street fiasco Democrats, including Obama, created.

Obama further blamed the United States Supreme Court for overturning the law on campaign spending.   No American has the right to decide how much money they wish to contribute without asking Washington’s permission first.  The chastising remark to the high court had Justice Alito shaking his head no; his lips could be seen uttering “not true, not true.”

The absurd inconsistencies had me shaking my head wondering if Obama’s Teleprompters have separate personalities or if the hair plug and the facelift sitting behind the president were pulling their own strings in attempt to hang Obama for their own political gain.

Barry and his Teleprompters live in a Utopian dream world he wants to drag each American into.  First the Messiah told Americans that “…the devastation [of unemployment] remains.  One in 10 Americans still cannot find work.  Many businesses have shuttered.  Home values have declined.  Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard.  And for those who’d already known poverty, life has become that much harder.”  Two minutes later Obama declared that “After one of the most difficult years in our history, they [Americans] remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school.  They’re coaching Little League and helping their neighbors…I have never been more hopeful about America’s future than I am tonight.  Despite our hardships, our union is strong.” 

In other words; America is destitute and dying, but she’s alive and well.  

Barry told America why he ran for president and why Wall Street collapsed last year: “[W]hen I ran for President, I promised I wouldn’t just do what was popular, I would do what was necessary.  And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today.  [Note: it’s 10%]  More businesses would certainly have closed.   More homes would have surely been lost.  So I supported the last administration’s efforts to create the financial rescue program.  And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable.  And as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we’ve recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.   Most but not all.” 

Just enough to use as an excuse to tax banks Americans will fund via their own personal investments and paychecks.  Obama cannot make one, single statement without asserting a contradictory knife to the throat of All Americans.

Wall Street did melt, homes and businesses have been lost, investments have vanished in record numbers because bailouts saved banks, which should have been allowed to go under and recoup losses without government involvement that has simply made things worse.

At times Obama acted as if 10 percent unemployment is non-existent and Americans are finding jobs in record number, yet spun the words around at fill-in-the-blank moments saying the opposite.  But he’s never had more hope than he did last night.

Again; the speech said everything and not one, damn thing at all.  The Marxist and Chief was consistently redundant, something George W. Bush was criticized for and Obama is praised as brilliant. 

Last night was simply a repeat of every Obamathon Americans have been forced to endure since the Water-walking windbag entered the presidential campaign.  There is nothing shocking to report, nothing great worth writing about. 

The major drawback is Americans are stuck with this Messianic Marxist and an anti-American administration for three more years.

On the upside, Michelle Obama is going to end childhood obesity in America.  The First Lady, who is apparently very “shy,” may want to tackle the overweight, gut-bellied legislators squeezed into Chamber last night.  Obesity reins in Washington, and it is not children who need their mouths wired shut.

Lisa Richards Copyright ©™ January 28, 2010

www.lisa-richards.com©™

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Don’t Underestimate Obama in 2012:

He May Be down But He’s Kicking

By Lisa Richards

January 26, 2010

After 40 plus years, the Kennedy throne has finally been overthrown by Republicans.  With old Kennedy men dead, there was no one to purchase Martha Coakley’s Senate seat, nor was there anyone strong enough to strong-arm Massachusetts voters into electing another criminal fraud.  Obama lost America’s Vatican City to Conservative Republican Scott Brown. 

But do not think for one moment Obama is going to take defeat lying down.  Bill Clinton’s first term was ruined by Hillary Care, the first World Trade Center bombing Clinton ignored, and Clinton nemesis Newt Gingrich, who ripped the House and Senate out from under the Dems with a Republican victory that should have spelled a 1996 defeat for Bill Clinton. 

Turning the Oval Office into a whore House and an impeachment trial ending with a guilty verdict did not stop Bill Clinton from being reelected.  Too many Americans love to be lied to before being hurled under the bus.

The opposite happened, because Bill Clinton, like a snake crushed at the cross, reared his ugly head and came back more energized than before with bigger plans conning Americans into land-sliding him into his second term.

Snakes know how to bamboozle hungry people ripe for picking.

I warn Americans to beware; Barry Obama may be down, but he is not staying down.  Obama is a radical Progressive Marxist of the left.  Like Hillary, who knew how to keep her husband in the White House, despite her wanting to strangle the life out of him, Obama’s friends are wealthy, radical, anti-American leftist lovers of mass murdering communist dictators, whom Obama himself greatly admires.  

Like Hillary, Obama will do whatever, say whatever, and change whatever he must about himself in order to keep himself in the White House long enough to radicalize America.  

Like Bill Clinton, Obama has his Hillary: Michelle, who is already planning something political for herself.  No doubt it is plans to revive her husband’s failed first year and get him reelected.  Remember what John Locke Wrote in The Second Treatise Of Government: “polities [cannot] be founded on anything but the consent of the people…many have mistaken the force of arms for the consent of the people, and reckon conquest as one of the originals of government.  But conquest is far from setting up any government as demolishing a house…makes way for a new commonwealth…by destroying [the country]…without the consent of the people…”

Remember, Obama seeks to “change” America, not restore and preserve her founding.  Obama will not play nice; he will pull out all the stops in order to obtain a second term.

Obama will not suddenly turn into Ronald Reagan, cutting taxes across the board, he will follow the advice Niccolo Machiavelli gave Prince Medici in the letter “Of Liberality and Parsimony:”

            ...if it [liberality] is used virtuously and as it should be used, it may not be           recognized…if one wants to maintain a name for liberality among men, it is   necessary not to leave out any kind of lavish display, so that the prince who has done        this will always consume all his resources in such deeds.  In the end it will be             necessary, if he wants to maintain a name for liberality [ancient liberty and         freedom], to burden the people extraordinarily, to be rigorous with taxes, and to all           things that can be done to get money.  This will begin to make him hated by his         subjects, and little esteemed by anyone…use the virtue of liberality so that it is      recognized, he should not, if he is prudent, care about a name of meanness.

Be of no doubt, liberals and the Obama team will do everything possible to use Obama’s skin color as a vote-grabbing weapon: if Obama is not reelected America is definitely racist, if Obama is tossed aside for some white candidate, America will prove it is the most racist black-hating nation on earth.

This is only the first year for Obama, he has failed miserably, but so did Bill Clinton. Obama knows he must make Americans forget Scott Brown even though Democrats leaders are abandoning his Titanic. 

Obama is collecting his team, creating new plans, new scare tactics for the elderly while attempting to pull the plug on life support and refusing women OBGYN care.  

Obama will tug at the heart strings of bored young Americans never satisfied more than five minutes and always seeking change for the country college professors have told them to hate.

Obama will find new rhetoric to sell redistribution of wealth without using the phrase.  He will not relinquish his radical friends, but he will hide them in such a way America does not realize those radicals are pulling the lever at the polls.

Americans must be on guard for the next four years and remember how clever the Clintons were.  Republicans thought they had victory after Gingrich’s take-down, but Clinton proved liars can tempt anyone to partake of their plans to destroy the nation. 

Obama will use the American Republic way: democracy through liberty to do what John Hobbes stated in Leviathan of what powerful men do to commonwealths in democracies:   It is manifest that men who are in absolute liberty may, if they please, give authority             to one man to represent…everyone, as well as give such authority to any             assembly of men whatsoever…Therefore, where there is already erected a sovereign        power, there can be no representative of the same people, but only to certain     particular ends…it is absurd to think that a sovereign assembly, inviting the people   of their dominion to send up their deputies…with power to make known their             advice and desires, should…hold…the absolute representation of the people…

Americans need to read the Ninth and Tenth Amendments and fully understand their Constitutional rights as individuals living in individual states with rights to elect and discharge leaders.  Obama knows these Amendments, he is well educated in Political Science and he is using his education to tear down the Republic.  He will not retreat because Scott Brown defeated Massachusetts Democrats, Obama is on the offense, and he intends to regain his momentum. 

We The People can tackle Obama and his policies and defeat him in 2012, placing a conservative Republican in office if we truly want that.  It is up to the people.  We hold the power; now let us use it for a victory, defeating Obama and his Marxist cooperative.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ January 26, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com©™

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

Mr. President, Give Americans One Good Reason Why We Should Feel Safe With You In Charge?

By Lisa Richards

January 11, 2009

Ever since Barry Obama took office, the War On Terror has become criminal activity handled with kid gloves.  Obama campaigned against Gunatanimo Bay, announcing he would shut the installation down if elected.  Obama kept his promise, stating by 2011 Gitmo will close.

Since the announcement, there have been two strikes in America and one outside: the Fort Hood attack by an American Islamic terrorist and U.S. soldier/psychologist working on the base murdered his fellow soldiers in the name of Allah and Islam.  He was known for being anti-American, anti-west, trying to convert fellow soldiers to Islam.

Next, the brutal 2009 attack on CIA officers by an Islamic terrorist, who made a video prior to the attack, explaining his reasons for the attack: Pakistani Taliban leader Beitullah Mehsud was killed by an America drone in the summer of 2009.

According to terrorist al-Balawi, “We say that we will never forget the blood of our Emir Beitullah Mehsud…To retaliate for his death in the United States and outside the United States will remain an obligation on all emigrants who were harbored by Beitullah Mehsud…The Jordanian and the American intelligence services offered me millions of dollars to work with them and to spy on mujaheddin here, but hamd'allah (thanks be to god) I came to the mujaheddin and I told them everything.  We arranged together this attack [on the CIA]”

Then on Christmas day 2009, 23 year-old Nigerian terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded Northwest Airlines flight 253 with 80 grams of the plastic explosive PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate), along with a chemical fuse, stuffed in his underwear (Richard Reid had 50 grams of PETN in his sneakers when  he lit them Christmas 2001, in an attempt to blow up a plane), which he lit in flight over Detroit, Michigan.  Passengers who saw smoke coming from the Nigerian’s blanket extinguished the bomb.

PETN, used by the military, cannot be detected by metal detectors, thus Abdulmutallub was able to walk through security.  He was not profiled despite the fact his identity was listed as dangerous.  His own father warned the U.S. Embassy his son was a threat to America; Abulmutallub has been on a terror “Watch List,” but not placed on the “No Fly” list, which prevents one from boarding a flight. (http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/28/airline.terror.attempt/index.html)

When questioned by investigators, Abdulmutallub stated he “acquired [the explosives] in Yemen along with instructions as to when it should be used.”  (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-yemen-planned-northwest-flight-253-bomb-plot/story?id=9426085)  Abdulmutallub admitted he is an al Qaeda recruit and the attack was in retaliation for U.S. attacks on Yemen soil.  But as Fox News and the London Times report, the U.S. airstrikes occurred on December 17, 2009, Abdulmutallub purchased his one-way ticket on December 16, 2009, the day before the Yemen strikes, proving he and al Qaeda planned the attack well in advance. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,581355,00.html)

Islamic sites are hailing the Nigerian terrorist as a “hero” for the “attack,” and the fact their “brother” “passed through security” undetected. 

Though the FBI says the amount of PETN could only blow a hole in the plane, the fact is the plane was in flight, a hole in the fuselage would have brought the plane down, killing 300 people on board.  What is worse is the fact Abdulmutallub was not taken into custody by counter terrorist experts and sent to Gitmo for interrogation, he was read Mirandized like a common criminal and then taken to a Federal Prison in Milan, Michigan where he was arraigned, pleading “not guilty” to the charges of committed terrorism. (http://abcnews.go.com/WN/umar-farouk-abdulmutallab-pleads-guilty-attempted-plane-bombing/story?id=9510524)

The Underwear Bomber, like Richard Reid and the 9/11 hijackers, purchased a one-way ticket and was on a watch list and considered dangerous to America.  Like the majority of terrorists, Adbulmutallub was not poor; rather he came from well-to-do family, is an an engineering graduate student who, according to Britain’s Independent, has been living the life of luxury in London, proving it is not poverty that makes one a terrorist, nor war, since Muslim terrorists always strike the U.S., or Israel, first.  It is religion, intolerance for mankind, and racism toward non-Muslims, which Americans and Westerners will not admit to for fear of being called racist.

Obama has been the worst offender in the area of tolerance and carelessness in protecting America: he appeases Islam while disregarding its threat, telling tolerance-numb Europe that “Islam has a place in America,” and “America is one of the largest Muslim countries.”

On August 6, 2009, The Washington Times reported “It’s official.  The U.S. is no longer engaged in a ‘war on terrorism.’  Neither is it fighting ‘jihadists’ or in a ‘global war.’”  Head of White House Homeland Security Office John Brennan told the Times “The President does not describe this as a ‘war on terrorism.’”  The reason, according to Brennan, Obama feels words have an effect on how people are perceived and how others react. 

Never mind the fact Islamic terrorist’s words and actions have severe effects on mankind.   The last time I checked, America was not at war with Catholics, Protestants, or Jews.

Brennan further declared the Obama Administration refuse terrorism rhetoric because “terrorism is but a tactic, a means to an end, which in al Qaeda’s case is global domination by an Islamic caliphate… [and] You can never fully defeat a tactic like terrorism any more than you can defeat the tactic of war itself.”  Brennan said using such phrases like “war on terror” assumes we are war with Islam.  Thank God Patton and MacArthur did not believe such kowtowing rubbish about Nazi’s and the Japanese.

Obama has weakened America, placing America at high risk with his words and lack of actions. 

In early 2009, Obama stated he was “trying to come up with a phrase that better articulates a hopeful message [than war terror].”  He came up with “Overseas Contingency Operation,” a term actually defined as Possible Unforeseen Out Of The Country Event requiring the Process of Procedural Maneuvers to take care of Business.

Technically, Obama put the war, and terrorists, in the same category of a G8 or G20 Summit on free-trade.

President Bush called terror what it is, terror, further declaring “Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists and every government that supports them.  Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there.  It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.”  Bush used the phrase “axis of Evil,” Reagan called the Soviets “The evil Empire.”  Obama refuses such expressions.  It would insult Islam and have an emotional effect on terrorists.

Obama allows terror to attack America through his insistence to close Gitmo, permitting terrorists to be treated as civilians, forbidding interrogations, claiming it is torture, expressing tolerance and gentle rhetoric, his asking Iran for sit-down peace talks, when it is considered surrender in Islam for the enemy—America—to ask for peace. 

The fact terrorists are allowed civilian court arraignment, receiving habeas corpus, is in effect handing America over to terrorists.  These monsters cannot be reasoned with, they do not seek or desire peace and negotiations; they plan and commit war and death.  They are not common criminals; they are destroyers of mankind, their ultimate goal.

Why should any American feel safe to fly?  Why should Americans feel safe with Barry Obama as Commander and Chief of the United States Military?  He won’t let them, or the CIA he wants imprisoned for rightful interrogating, do their job.

According to CIA Bomber, “What we [Islamic terrorists] strive for cannot be exchanged for all the wealth in the world.  This attack will be the first of the revenge operations against the Americans.”

In Obama’s latest speech, he had no choice but to refer to the Underwear Bomber’s actions as “war on Terror.”  But his “Buck stops here with me” idiom holds no ground.  He has lost his presidency by proving he cannot keep America safe, because he does not want to fight the very people he was raised with: Islam.

Lisa Richards Copyright©™ All Rights Reserved January 11, 2010

www.lisa-richards.com©™

How Obama’s Politics Aid and Abet Terrorists

By Lisa Richards

December 17, 2009

The only way for terrorism and Islam to succeed is white guilt heaped upon Americans by anti-war activists and a self-centered smug president who constantly apologizes for America’s existence while blaming Americans for everything wrong in history.

In April of 2009, Barry Obama spoke to the EU, apologizing because “America has failed to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world,” declaring “America has failed as a nation, because, “instead of celebrating your dynamic [EU] union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”  These degrading comments about the nation that saved Europe from Hitler and complete totalitarianism and starvation, and continues protecting the EU with American military presence they can’t survive without, drew thunderous applause.

Obama declared he wants Guantanamo Bay closed, stating it does not make America safer having terrorist behind bars.  The EU agrees.  So does Iran.

On September 23, 2009, Obama told the UN Assembly there is “discontent” with “the status quo that has allowed us to be increasingly defined by our differences…”  Anti-Americans and terrorists are discontent.  Our differences with the EU are America is free-market and the EU is collective socialism.  America is autonomous, it does not seek to join the global community and play into the hands of terrorists as Spain did in 2005 by choosing a socialist leader under the demands of terrorists.

Obama blames Iraq’s terror on America, saying America “acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others.”  More than two dozen nations aided America in the War On Terror.  Obama, liberals, terrorists, and communist nations want Americans believing we acted alone and are the cause of terror attacks. 

Obama masterfully aids and abets the enemy by chastising and degrading America as selfish, greedy over-spenders, whom he points fingers at for war rather than the enemy seeking war as a way to commit suicide and kill as many non-Muslims as possible.

Today’s America is not at war with an enemy seeking victory, as Hitler and Mussolini did, or Stalin and Khrushchev desired during the Cold War, America is at war with an enemy hell-bent on complete world destruction, with only Muslims left dwelling. 

We fight an enemy with nothing to lose: they do not enter battle to just kill enemies; the goal is murder/suicide for the Islamic reward of Koranical virginal paradise.

The only way for this type of enemy gains momentum is white liberals inflicting white guilt: guilt over Europeans discovering and colonizing America, blaming Columbus for discovering and exploring South America, Puerto Rico and Haiti, Cortez’s exploration of South America, guilt for slavery, despite the fact Africans were the culprits selling their own brutalized people to Portuguese and British for money.  White guilt must be heaped upon Americans because William Bradford’s Mayflower landed at Indian Plymouth and settled Cape Cod.  There must be guilt over John Smith founding James Town and the terrible John Rolf marrying Pocahontas and producing half-white children.  

White guilt allows the enemy to gain control, easily attacking America and the West.  How; anti-war, anti-white anti-American Americans who despise their ancestry, English language, and Anglo culture, pushing hate for all things, Christian, Jewish, and American on college students, who shun from their very American existence with shame over under-developed countries they are told America’s wealth caused through colonization.

Colonization brought modern medicine, education, and wealth to nations everywhere.  Anti-American liberal globalists do everything in their power to prevent third world nations from developing and gaining wealth.  The reason; poverty inflicts guilt upon brainwashed Americans who will apologize for Islamic attacks because America’s wealth creates hate.

Guilt is the enemy’s greatest weapon, freely provided by anti-war activists and Obama, constantly blaming America while insisting on peace-talks with Iran.  The very act of asking for peace-talks with Iran surrendered America. 

Asking for peace plays into the hands of the enemy.  Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad does not believe in or want peace, he plans world annihilation to bring about the Invisible Mahdi, or Twelfth Imam, whom he follows. 

Guilt over climate change—something that has happened every four months since the dawn of man—keeps America’s focus off Iran, Iraq, North Korea, the Taliban, and Gitmo terrorists receiving habeas corpus in New York City courts. 

Terror never seeks peace, rather destruction.  Terror does not want negotiations, as Obama and G20EU leaders foolishly push through guilt, terror seeks war and death.  This can only be achieved through white guilt bred in complacent American minds.

America’s Constitutional Republic created and liberty and freedom for all, but if liberty spreads, terror ends.  If guilt swells terror succeeds. 

The enemy has modern weapons.  They are provided with AK-47’s, chemical and biological agents, and necessary supplies to create nuclear bombs.  This is the least of our problem; America has technology to ward off missiles.   Psychological war created by liberals enables enemy success: if Americans feel guilty for crusades, started 400 years earlier by Mohammad, who brutally converted through bloodshed, and continued for centuries by Muslims with the single desire of world takeover through death, the enemy easily conquers.

Guilty Americans are on their knees with bowed heads waiting for beheadings they feel they deserve: terrorist kill because they are poor, because America buys their oil making their nations rich, wealthy Americans live too well, America owns big cars and bigger homes said to be destroying the world climate, Americans should downsize to small homes and bumper cars that run electricity—fueled by carbon dioxide spewing coal. 

Christmas trees and American TV offend Muslims, supporting Israel forces Palestinians to murder Jews, America’s slavery past, purchasing Indian lands, and allowing women to be seen in public without head coverings, caused 9/11.

Obama shames America for Iraq and Saddam Hussein, who tortured and murdered thousands, yet it was justifiable America entered Bosnia and removed Milosevic from power.

Obama further aids the enemy by dragging his feet about sending needed troops to Afghanistan.  This gives the Taliban time to gain force.

Guilt: the greatest weapon the enemy has: delivered directly from Obama, every day, with anti-American, pro-European speeches fueling the enemy with power to attack the West.

Lisa Richards Copyright © ™ December 17, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com © ™

Obama’s Political Tactics: Blame and Shame America into European Complacency

By Lisa Richards

December 16, 2009

Barry Obama has one consistent melodrama: he habitually complains he “inherited a war,” he “inherited a deficit,” he “inherited this financial crisis,” and he “inherited a mess.”   Barry Obama is the first president in American history to inherit his predecessor’s problems.  And Ronald Reagan thought he had problems!

Never once will the Messiah admit it Democrats who forced banks to lend to low-incomers who cannot repay massive housing loans.  Obama refuses to own up to the fact the 2006 return of Democrats to power forced the Fed to continue lowering interests rates so far, American banks sunk.  Nor will Obama admit Democrats Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton increased housing lending to low-income blacks and Hispanics ala the race card, creating massive deficits George W. Bush’s outlandish spending couldn’t out-do.

In less than a year, Barry Obama has single-handedly created the largest deficit in American history.   He has spent more than any administration in over 200 years, or the nation it’s self.  He did this within the first few months of entering office. 

Obama claims excessive spending along with enormous tax increases will generate jobs and business.  As Obama, Reid, and Pelosi spend, job loss grows and businesses are facing cap and trade laws that will increase Chinese trade overall, while destroying American corporations—big and small, Main Street and Wall Street.

Obama admitted, on the campaign trail while cameras were rolling, he intends to “spread the wealth around.”  Conservatives were outraged by this; the clip became a scandal that should have lost Obama the race.  But Obama won the election because his “change” speeches sounded oh so charismatically kool to the well-educated, ignorant, chugging collage voters, who consider Obama hip and cool, and black voters he conned into believing he has a magical stash of cash set aside for them to tap into. 

Obama has criticized massive spending by American banks.  In the mean time he lent banks hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars he claimed would pull the banks out of debt.  He then feigned shock this week when banks handed out giant bonuses to CEO’s.  He condemned them on 60 Minutes and then he hugged them as wonderful and trying to do the right thing.

Obama consistently blames the economic downturn on Americans he claims spend too much money.  Note to Barry Obama; this is a free-market capitalist economy, Americans have the right to spend their hard earned money any way they want.  If Americans wish to save and invest, (which many did and lost money, because Democrats allowed banks to over lend hundreds of billions to low-incomers unable to pay mortgages, causing banks to collapse and Americans money with them), or spend on sprees, it is the free choice of every American to do as he or she wants.  It is also the liberty of businesses to spend money however they desire without the government bullying them into salary caps and unionized workforces.

It is excessive taxes heaped on Americans and handed out to welfare queens that have hurt the economy, not Americans spending their own money.

Obama has spent the last eleven months apologizing to the world for America.  It is America’s fault there are underdeveloped countries wallowing in poverty while America digs up their diamonds and gold (but never pays for the precious metals and gems, because Americans love to knock poor people over the heads and steal their stash), to drape all over themselves while the third would starves to death.

Isn’t it a horrible shame America has never given one, single dime to poor nations, never once feeding, clothing, doctoring and building schools, churches, hospitals, and shelters, nor has America lifted one finger to rescue Sudanese slaves or Chinese children hurled in the streets, because no more than one child per household is permitted.  Never fear, Barry Obama will apologize to the world and hopefully shame America into complying with globalization.

It is America’s fault we are dependent on Saudi oil, despite the fact Americans have begged the government to stop catering to Saudi Arabia for oil.

It is America’s fault there is pollution: we drive big gas guzzlers when we should be driving electric cars powered by coal-powered grids spewing cancerous carbon dioxide into the air.  Never mind the EPA has proven this, as long as we make Ed Begley Jr. happy, that’s all that matters.

That is why Obama received the Nobel Prize: he hates free-market capitalism, he despises liberty and the fact America is autonomously separate from the world with a nation of self-sufficient people able to take care of themselves, and worse: America is a Judeo Christian nation founded on God.  Therefore Obama constantly apologizes for a country he is as ashamed of as Europeans are: the country that foolishly elected him president. 

I’m surprised Obama wasn’t presented with the crown of Norway by the king himself for the insulting speech he delivered to the Nobel nuts, begrudgingly declaring how he must be a war-time president.  

No wonder Europe loves Obama; he caters to their whims while hurling America under the bus.

Lisa Richards Copyright © ™ December 16, 2009 All Rights Reserved™

www.lisa-richards.com©™

Tyranny In America PT 3

A Look At George Washington’s Courage

Lisa Richards

 November 1, 2003

“Mr. President, Tho’ I am truly sensible of the high Honour done me in this Appointment, yet I feel great distress, from a consciousness that my abilities & Military experience may not be equal to the extensive & important Trust: However, as the Congress desire it I will enter upon the momentous duty, & exert every power I Possess In their service & for the Support of the glorious cause…I beg it be remembered by every Gentn in the room…I do not think myself equal to the Command I am honoured with…”

Commander George Washington,

Address to the Continental Congress, June 16, 1775

George Washington did not think himself a great man.  He thought himself no more than a farmer lacking sufficient skills to win a war that would create a free nation.  He wrote to Martha on June 18, 1775, telling her Congress had raised an army he was to command for “…the defense of the American Cause shall be put under my care…”  Washington’s letter is a heartfelt letter from a husband missing his family he longs to be home with, “But, as it has been a kind of destiny that has thrown upon me this Service, I shall hope that my undertaking of it, is designed to answer some good purpose…”  Washington, though not confident in his skills as a commander, believed destiny was a duty called upon all to serve in some way. 

Washington wrote Burwell Bassett on June 19, 1775, telling Basset that commanding the Continental Army was “…an honour I by no means aspired to…” but describing himself as not having the capacity or experience to lead.  He never wanted to be a great general or leader of a nation; he longed to be a farmer, living quietly at Mount Vernon.  The 1775 letters show a humble man unsure if he is worthy of serving his nation, but believes no matter what, he must answer the call to defend freedom: “May God grant therefore that my acceptance of it (the command) be attended with some good to the common cause…”  Despite self-doubt and insecurity, Washington knew he would never have the life he truly desired if he did not step up and answer the cause to end tyranny in America.

During 1775, tyranny reigned in America; it was destroyed by the end of the century with the defeat of the British and signing of the Constitution.  George Washington never imagined, after many lost battles and long years of fighting, that he would lead his army in decisive battles, defeating the most powerful army on earth.  Nor did he conceive he would become America’s first leader: “…the most important & flattering call of my Country…” He told John Langdon on April 14, 1789. 

How different Washington’s words sound in comparison to the pompous, inflated community organizer, who can’t speak without interjecting “I,” “Me,” and “My” into every sentence of every arrogant speech delivered more often than a junk mail.

Washington’s first inaugural address told Americans he was appreciative, emotional, and thankful.  He accepted the office of president out of “…obedience to the public summons…”  Nowadays leadership is not accepted but bought with bribes of free rent, medicine, amnesty, and money handouts from a president promising everyone a job.  Is that before or after employers are bankrupted from excessive taxes and union dues?

Leadership today is not obedience to the call of serving one’s nation but self-serving one’s pork fed ego.   Washington would be appalled to see tyranny once again reigns as modern liberals are dismantling the Constitution he helped frame and sign, while ripping liberty and freedom from Americans and replacing it with tyrannical equality.

Washington fought a war he felt incapable to help lead, but he said yes to defending liberty and destroying tyranny, and did so to the best of his ability, which turned out to be great.  Today Washington is lowered to being a slave owning terrorist who can’t hold a candle to the water-walking Obama, now America’s new Founding Father of Chicago Marxism and socialist supremacy.

Today’s school children do not read Washington’s letters, speeches, personal diaries and prayers.  Children are led to believe Washington was a Cherry chopping liar and Indians would be free to roam casino-less wilds if he did not help win a war of independence against Britain.  How sad Indians must be forced to collect billions from slot machines. 

On December 29, 1790, Washington wrote to the Seneca Nation and Six Nations, telling them he would secure their land for them, that no one had the right to their land unless the Seneca’s wanted to sell it themselves.  He asked for peace between the Indians and settlers, that all were one nation and he desired friendship amongst all Americans.

How evil and tyrannical is that!

Today’s children are taught men like Washington did not found this nation on God or pray to HIM despite writings proving otherwise.  Children are forbidden to read the truth about the great Founders.  If they did, they would discover the Founders hated slavery, but could not yet abolish it because the nation was not stable enough to fight another war against itself.  Children today, as well as adults, do not realize many northern blacks owned slaves.  We do not discuss that fact: Africans sold their own people to traders and traders actually sold blacks to blacks (wallbuilders.com).

History is rewritten in order to appease blacks and Hispanics indoctrinated to hate whites.  How sad black children do not know George Washington fought alongside great black men who helped free this nation.  Some of our Founders were black preachers, all friends and mentors to our white Founders (wallbuilders.com).

Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, Reverend Wright, and Van Jones are preaching hate into the minds of black Americans they want rising up as Marxists, creating a tyrannical government forbidding freedom and liberty to all.

What Americans need, and must do, is read our Founder’s writings.  They were both white and black (wallbuilders.com); they fought tyranny in order that we would live free from men who seek power to destroy.

Washington said these words of our nation in his first inaugural address:

“…to the Great Author (God) of every public and private good…No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the people of the United States.  Every step, by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation, seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency (God)…to the benign parent of the human race…[H]e has been pleased to favour the American people, with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquility…for deciding [a unanimous] form of Government, for the security of their union…advancement of their happiness…this divine blessing…the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend.”

Tyranny cannot overtake America unless we allow it to.  Freedom will reign as long as one person answers the call to defend America to the best of his or her ability.

Lisa Richards Copyright © November 1, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Tyranny In America PT. 2

By Lisa Richards

October 26, 2009

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, it was not enacted into law overnight, nor was it rushed through Congress as leaders do today, against the will of the people, the Founders debated the document fiercely, fighting over the language, demanding states and people not lose their rights to the federal government or a document that might include any disavowing of liberty.  If only today’s leaders had the will of the people in mind when considering bills.

The Constitution took long to agree upon, letters were sent to newspapers by the Founders, explaining their personal beliefs, promising rights and liberties would not be trampled, the Supreme court would never seek to steal legislative power, nor would the Constitution ever turn into a document used to wield power against the people by enacting unconstitutional laws.

On February 21, 1787, Congress adopted a resolution favoring a convention with legislators from states who had not yet convened.  Delegates were assembled and seven states convened on May 25, 1787 proposing the Constitution of the United States.  George Washington was elected president by the convention, and on September 17, 1887, the Constitution was signed by members of the convention.  The Constitution was then submitted to congress with a resolution proposing how the Federal Government of the United States should work. 

It took until 1791 for completion. Benjamin Franklin spoke on September 17, 1787, stating:

I confess that I do not entirely approve of this Constitution at present, but Sir, I am not sure I shall never approve it; For having lived long, I have experienced many Instance of being oblig’d, by better Information or fuller Consideration…It is therefore that the older I grow the more apt I am to doubt my own Judgment and to pay more Respect to the Judgments of others…I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such: because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well administered…

     Benjamin Franklin stated something ominous in the speech that unfortunately has come to pass: government seizing power by overriding the Constitution with absolutism not found in the Constitutional democracy: “I believe farther that this [Constitution and its laws are] likely to be well administered for a Course of Years, and can only end in Despotism as other Forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other.”

Today’s government attempts to ram bills through the House within weeks without bothering to read excessively long bills: Obama’s radical healthcare bill.  Americans are forbidden knowledge of details, even legislators are kept in the dark when it comes to bills too long to read.  It is safe to say excessively lengthy bills are meant to Europeanize America, taking away fundamental rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. 

Citizens have the final say on whether or not they want bills Washington pushes on the people.  More often bills are enacted against the will of the people.  The Supreme Court today legislates from the bench, enacting laws, such as Roe V. Wade, rather than interpreting the Constitution. This is not constitutional as we see from what happened in history and what it took to pass the Constitution into law.

Too many justices claim the Constitution is a living document that evolves with time.  In some cases we must agree that such philosophy has been valuable to the people: ending slavery, desegregating schools and public buildings, and giving women and blacks the right to vote.  However, if an evolving constitution is so good, it would not have the underlying and destructive intent liberals have used.

Making the Constitution a living document that evolves with time has allowed liberal justices to harm America: Roe V. Wade gave women the right to murder their unborn children, justices use the Constitution to turn the Supreme Court into a legislative branch taking Second Amendment rights away from many states.  To say we have a Second Amendment is not completely true when not all Americans have the right to firearms and defending their lives. 

Evolving the Constitution with time has removed the death penalty from most states under the misuse of Article VIII’s “cruel and unusual punishment.”  That clause does not apply to victims of brutal crimes by murderers set free under the Warren Court that changed America’s justice system into one favoring rights to violent criminals. 

How odd murderers have rights, but Teri Schiavo did not.

Pot smokers want marijuana legalized under the Constitution as a medical drug despite scientific evidence that today’s marijuana is bred to induce a dangerous opiate effect.

Terrorists have been given rights to habeas corpus despite no such rights in the Constitution—yet.  Liberals demand terrorists be treated as criminals under Article V and VI of the Constitution and tried in federal courts rather than military tribunals.

When the Constitution is allowed to evolve with time, it is not to preserve liberty and freedom as was done with desegregation and the end of slavery; it is to destroy the very foundations of the Constitution.

The “evolution of devolution” belongs in Britain where Sharia law has been enacted to their unwritten constitution.  Evolving the U.S. Constitution has removed God and prayer from public schools and public buildings, forbidden the Pledge of Allegiance in school, made Christian holidays illegal in schools, created tolerance laws favoring Muslims, protecting honor murderers, and criminalizing Jews and Christians.  Free Speech has made virtual child pornography legal.

All have used the First Amendment to take away our First Amendment rights.

Illegal aliens abuse the Constitution in order to invade America.  Amnesty is a misuse of the Constitution, and has been legal so long, many assume it only fair “hard-working Mexicans” be allowed “to do the jobs Americans refuse.”

The Constitution was never meant to evolve, rather continue as written in order to protect liberty and keep America free.  But thanks to progressives the Constitution has turned into a weapon of injustice against the people.

Benjamin Franklin would be appalled to see his words turned false and became something he and the Founders fought so long against: tyranny.

Lisa Richards Copyright © October 26, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Tyranny In America

By Lisa Richards

October 21, 2009

“Obama learned his lesson well.  I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008.  It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.” Letter from L. David Alinsky, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky

The Boston Globe, August 31, 2008

What man is free who has to beg the government for his livelihood?  When men are told how much they can and cannot earn, what they can own, what they cannot attain, they become slaves to men in power.  When people are placed under living conditions, not of their own deciding, but that of the government, they are slaves, owned and controlled.  Such policies cripple hearts and minds, creating people without incentives or cares of their own well-being.  These people become easy pawns in the hands of the government which uses people to its own benefit: power. 

Eventually government control appears normal and people forget to question its wrongs, its divine assumption of the right to kingship…or Messiah.

Twentieth century radical communist Saul Alinsky cleverly conned Americans by using the Founding Fathers as one of his models for “change.”  But Alinsky was nothing like the Founders; he was a Chicago Marxist who tried to start a revolution to take down the very foundations of America in the name of the poor. 

Alinsky, like Barry Obama, used that word “change.”  He wanted to “change” America, get rid of the wealthy, make everyone equal, he wanted the poor to rise up and create class warfare.  Hillary Clinton so adored Alinsky’s radical anti-American ideals, she wrote her college thesis on the Marxist.  Alinsky was so impressed with Hillary’s praise of his Marxist ideals, he wanted to hire her.

Imagine praising Hitler and having him offer you a job.  It’s no different.  The Jewish Alinsky was a communist who wanted destructive uprisings.

Seventeenth century English philosopher John Locke wrote in The Second Treatise Of Government that “…tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which nobody can have a right to.”  Governments that entitle themselves to the private property of the people—be it land, income, possessions, businesses, people’s very lives—are out for their own gain with complete disregard of the people they see as a means to an end. 

Americans face this dilemma right now: a government seeking its own ambitious gain, a government intent on crushing the American spirit in order to accomplish its main goal: rewriting the Constitution to create a European/\Alinsky/\Marxist-style government with full control over people who have no sovereignty. 

The destruction of nationalism is the ultimate goal, but it cannot be attained and implemented if people stand up against socialism and reject tyranny.  Locke warned:  “Wherever law ends tyranny begins, if the law be transgressed to another’s harm.”

As I write this, Democrats (Republicans not allowed) are sequestered behind secret doors attempting to ram an 1100 page bill, containing unconstitutional regulations, into law against the will of the people.  Saul Alinsky would be proud of his disciple.

There can be no other reason to create bills over 100 pages long if not to turn America’s Common Law system into European Civil Law—Code Law.  We already have the Internal Revenue Code, my all-time favorite bullet in the head; however, we are a Case Law nation.  Excessive bills are beginning to include coded laws that, if enacted and passed, will mean we no longer have a free court system.  If that doesn’t sound so bad, think Dred Scott and how one judge in favor of slavery used a code (as well as misrepresenting the Constitution), rather than cases regarding citizenship, to keep a black man in bondage.

Ironically, the “Happy Negro” is attempting to magically Dred Scott Americans while writing amnesty for illegals into his bills.  

Those who wish to push us into European Civil Law and strict codes, rather than cases determining our laws freely, are enacting attempting tyranny. 

The Constitution is not an evolving document that lives and breathes to be changed with the course of time.  We are not Great Britain, lacking a written, ratified, codified constitution or working bill of rights: America does not have “devolution-by-way-of-evolution.” The Constitution stands as is: perfect, providing freedom, justice, and unifying us as one people.  Those attempting to change it believe the Constitution is inferior and Europe is superior.  Those people do not speak for the people; they speak for tyranny they want installed against our will.

 We are witnessing great harm from Democrats, Moderate Republicans (liberals), liberals, and the Obama Administration, who ignore the will of the people for the sole goal of “fundamentally changing America” into a socialist nation. 

Tyranny exists in the Obama Administration: they value Marxism and violent dictators rather than the Founding Fathers and God. 

Americans paid the king for lack of rights and ownership.  Over two centuries since the Revolution ended, we find ourselves again a nation controlled by one man and those serving under him.  John Locke said of those who take power to control people: “…whosoever in authority exceeds the power given him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command to compass that upon the subject which the law allows not, ceases in that to be a magistrate; and, by acting without authority, may be opposed as any other man who by force invades the right of another.” 

John Locke described the ends of a political society as one giving up freedom to that of another land, allowing foreign powers to control and enslave us under tyranny.  He asked: “If man in the state of nature be so free, as has been said; if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to nobody, why will he part with his freedom?”   Of those who have power to “seize,” Locke said they should “be opposed as a thief and a robber” if they try to take what belongs to the citizens without actual rights to do so.  

The early Americans understood tyranny; they had the courage to stand up and fight anything that stole their freedom.  We must do the same.

 It does not take violence as liberals incur when protesting, it takes speaking out with courage and holding fast to our founding and God.  It means standing up to preserve America’s future in her founding.  If we do not, America will fall to Marxism, which has been trying to break down the door of liberty for 100 years.

Lisa Richards Copyright © October 21, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Hey Buddy, Can You Spare A Trillion?

A Look At Adam Smith’s Economics

By Lisa Richards

October 18, 2009

Remember the good old days when you couldn’t comprehend a trillion dollars or grasp spending unheard of amounts of money?  Whoever thought the day would come when a billion dollars would be coffee change and the expression “millionaire” would define those in the same category as middle-class, who are losing their homes to foreclosure?  Welcome to the world of Washington politics as usually conceited jerks stealing America’s money.

In 1776, free-market capitalist-economist Adam Smith warned, in his influential monetary guide, The Wealth Of Nations, that excessive bank lending leads to bank collapse.  Smith warned that paper money must have the same intrinsic value of gold and silver or paper is nothing more than paper.  America used to run on the gold standard until the unelected enacting of the Federal Reserve by the Supreme Court in 1913.  “True money,” what Smith referred to as gold, is no longer the standard America uses to borrow, lend, and spend, paper money, which has lost value, is the standard bearer of currency and trade.

Gold, now valued at more than $1000 dollars an ounce, surpasses the standard currency valued at less than its dollar value.  1000 worthless dollar bills may purchase one gold coin, but that gold coin cannot be used to pay your mortgage, doctor, grocer, etc.  No one accepts gold today, because it is not the stock of the nation’s reserve.

Federal Reserve Secretary Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson insisted Wall Street banks receive $125 billion from the $700 billion stimulus package, it was guaranteed to pull AIG, Merrill Lynch, and Lehman Brothers out of bankruptcy.  It did not.  The banks, it turns out, were not failing, and did not need loans.  The $700 billion was spent on everything but bank bailouts, leading to the current economic mess, putting America further in debt and begging China for money. 

The Fed over-printed paper, now cheap money, circulated it, leading to the accumulation of worthless toxic assets no one wants to purchase. 

Adam Smith stated: “Had every particular banking company always understood and attended its own particular interest, the circulation [of money] never could have been over-stocked with paper money.”  Smith wrote those words in 1776, warning nations not to extend credit beyond the limits, never print more paper money than the gold in reserve, and do not allow banks to become reckless with people’s money.  Smith warned “[that] issuing too great a quantity of paper, of which the excess was continually returning, in order to be exchanged for gold and silver (or houses for those unable to repay mortgages), the bank…was for many years…obliged to coin gold…” or in America’s case, print paper to back the loans.

Adam Smith was showing mistakes England made before 1776, explaining that “over-trading of some bold projectors [in England] was the original cause of excessive circulation of paper money.”  England made drastic monetary mistakes before Smith wrote his  economic guidebook, 200 years later, America, which Smith praised in The Wealth Of Nations as being financially prosperous due to wise choices in saving and spending, has ignored Smith’s warnings: “ A bank ought not to advance more than the amount which merchants would otherwise have to keep by them in cash.”  The Fed allowed paper to exceed its value, lending more than the nation has in banks and the Reserve altogether, going beyond Smith’s warning: lend when absolutely necessary: war time and infrastructure protection.

The government cannot borrow more than it has in the Federal Reserve.  Lending itself does not just occur inside the Fed, London and Tokyo impart the U.S. when Americans go to lending houses.  If the government’s central banking system lacks sufficient funds needed to repay lenders, the debtor is in trouble and the whole of society feels the liability: deficits.  Without capital backing loan, government banks must find ways to subsidize promissory notes (raising taxes), and no government can possibly settle up exorbitant sums it did not comprise in the first place. 

“Money,” Smith said, “… [is] the great wheel of circulation, the great instrument of commerce…of trade…and a very valuable part of the capital…” but it is not the actual “…revenue…” of the nation as a whole.  It is the people, according to Smith, who create wealth.  Banks lend, interest on promissory notes is what must provide the actual circulation. 

Smith said stock (nation’s supply of goods), is not in de facto revenue, rather, money from the reserve that must “…circulate in society…” in order to become revenue.  Over-extending money and circulating cheap paper on anything not yet tangible, because, as Smith said, “it resembles money,” is playing a dangerous game. 

Smith wrote that Money, is a “…means of which the whole revenue (profits) of the society is regularly distributed among different members, which makes itself no part of [the actual proceed, because] …the revenue of society consists altogether in [the] goods [bringing in the returns], and not the [company or bank loan] that circulates them.”  Lending money without credit is investing in disaster. 

John B. Taylor of the Hoover Institute explains in Hoover’s summer 2009 edition: “Monetary excesses were the main cause” of the sudden and rapid increase in the 1990’s that exploded eight years ago.   Subprime lending and “adjustable-rate mortgages, which led to excessive risk raking… [caused] delinquency rates and foreclosure rates…” to soar out of control.  As mortgage interest rates “declined rapidly,” liable rates of the interest, which are supposed to vary according to each prime rate, were “packed” into large lending securities, backed by each loan association. 

Smith told us the “bearer” of the loan is equally responsible to the banking system and the “…demands…” to circulate money properly.  Smith would view Washington’s stimulus lending, after allowing Wall Street to lend poorly to those incapable of repaying loans, as reckless banking failure. 

Everything Adam Smith warned against has been done; the results are exactly what he held to be the end result: collapse of paper money and banks.

Excessive lending happened, now it must be remedied.  Smith can only remind us that “The sum of bank money for which receipts (loans or credit) are expired must be very considerable.  It must comprehend the whole original capital of the bank, which…has been allowed to remain there…whatever the amount $700 Billion), the proportion which it bears to the whole mass of bank money is supposed to be very small.”  Smith would say Washington exceeded interest without credit, the only way to remedy the problem; “…attend to the interest of trade…” by not continuing down the same path. 

Americans need to realize Democrats and moderate Republicans—liberals—cannot be reelected, nor can their bills be allowed to pass.  If we want to remedy our failure, we must force leaders to veto Obama’s Healthcare Bill, as well as other Marxist, anti-capital bills designed to enact the poverty of the nation.

Lisa Richard copyright © October 18, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Can The Nobel Peace Prize Save Barry From Hillary’s Wrath?

(Look Out Barry: Here Comes Hillary

PT 2)

By Lisa Richards

October 9, 2009

Barry Obama is officially the 2009 recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”  He is the third U.S. president to receive the award since 1906  for progressive incompetency.  Jimmy Carter is number two for all his seditious efforts against America.

I am not a fan of Bill Clinton, nor do I feel George H.W. Bush was a great president, but even I have to admit the two former rivals deserve the Peace Prize for they’re working together aiding victims of disaster, Middle East terror, and poverty around the world.  Obama receiving the prize makes him the first person to receive the award for doing absolutely nothing.

Obama’s only accomplishment is he is the first black-skinned president and first candidate to actually keep his promise of “Change” for America.  Unfortunately America now needs the Bush-Clinton team to provide aid relief from the Obama disaster.

Obama may want to duck, I see a hurled lamp heading his way.

Hillary has been very quiet since becoming Secretary of the State.  Too quiet for a Clinton who does not know the meaning of butt out and keep silent, the president is in charge.  When a Clinton remains quiet and appears subservient to the president they are not married to, look out, and duck.  Hell is ready to break loose, and this time the victim will be wearing his shoes.

Obama needs to take cover, Hillary’s silence is more deadly than her temper when it comes to getting even and taking back what she feels is rightfully hers: the Oval Office.   Not to mention a prize she will no doubt feel her husband deserves for actually doing something for communities.

Hillary was thrown aside by feminists who bowed down to her upstart rival.  Many feminists however refused to support Barry Obama, feminists wanted a woman in office and Obama never bothered to ask Hillary to join his ticket.  Many feminists threw their hats in the McCain ring, because McCain gave the country a female candidate for the Vice Presidency, something Dems haven’t done since 1984 with Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro.

Hell hath no fury like the Betty Freidan Brigade of braless bravado. 

Giving Obama a prize he never earned (because he’s never done anything in his life but talk), is another slap in Hillary’s face.  She has been sequestered, unlike the ever present Condoleezza rice, who, was greatly respected by Bush and was daily front page news.  Hillary is the forgotten member of a Marxist administration that can’t afford to have a Clinton as Vice President, breathing down the neck of Obama, whom she would destroy if, she resided down the hall.

Pushing Hillary aside, keeping her out of the spotlight, the press virtually ignoring her every move, her actions becoming nothing more than that of a gofer, are going to come back to bite Obama in the jugular.

Hillary’s creepy friendship with Arafat and his fat wife have been snubbed for another Palestinian lip-lock.  

Obama has been in office only nine months.  The media is acting as if the announcement is unexpected.  Obama said he is “humbled,” but who is truly surprised?  Unless one is a faux scientist or Castro’s best friend, one cannot possibly be praised as savior.

According to Oslo, “Obama has, as president, created a new climate in international politics.  Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.  His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.” 

Tearing down the Berlin Wall and destroying communism was not a “shared” desire by the world. 

Obama has indeed created a new climate, one that has most Americans angry and fighting back at his policies.  Obama has united Americans in all parties, bringing Americans together rejecting his horrendous “change” that will cost $7.1 trillion in deficits.  His diplomacy toward dictators has Americans questioning his loyalties; his Marxist administration has provided a recipe for disaster.  Yes, he has captured world attention, but his consideration paid to “spreading the wealth” has not endeared him to this nation. 

In nine months of doing nothing (except administer Marxist policies, appear on TV, and expend jet fuel), Obama has driven the country into a hole of debt no president in U.S. history has done.  Obama’s stimulus bills have amounted to more money spent in all of U.S. history.  Even the Clintons didn’t steal to that level.

Nine months have felt like nine years.  When I find myself saying: “Clinton was better,” “Bush was cheap,” “even Carter was too stupid to pull that one,” “LBJ and FDR would be shocked,” and “maybe Hillary isn’t such a bad choice after all,” I want life-long counseling.

If Obama were white, he never would have received the Nobel Prize.  Ted Kennedy would have for his swimmingly bridging the gap of corruption.

Do not think for one moment Hillary will let this transgression slide.  She may smile and congratulate, but she’s sharpening the dagger of retribution as her teeth prepare to sink.

Beware the ides of a marching Clinton.

Lisa Richards Copyright © October 9, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Did The Bank Bail-Out Help Anyone Get A Loan Or Is the Fed Simply continuing Its Illegal Control Over American Lives?

By Lisa Richards

October 5, 2009

The Federal Reserve has been a thorn in the side of Americans for nearly 100 years.  It’s definitely time for this unelected pseudo-branch of government to go.  The Fed regulates our money and economy in ways unconstitutional to the founding laws of the United States.  A central regulatory system of banking and money control was never the idea, plan of the founders who knew such a plot would be economically disastrous.

In 2008, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave banks $125 billion in bailouts claiming it would prevent a banking collapse.  The wealthy cannot get loans, so who is receiving bank loans for homes and business?  Surely not low-income ACORN darlings.

How weak were banks that they needed $125 billion, yet, the wealthy, who can repay loans, cannot acquire loans.  Banks are not lending, so what was the panic about if not a way for the Fed to gain more control over American money and lives via banks they have strong-armed since the early twentieth century?

The TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) was allegedly going to prevent another 1929, instead it created more Teddy Roosevelt-style progressive control over our lives.  The banks were not collapsing, they were stable, but TARP and the Fed have placed banks, and the people, in a position of further crawling and begging to the regulators of American money: the people’s money, not the government.

According to Bernanke and Paulson, the $125 billion dollar loan would enable banks to lend.  If that is true, why is it so difficult to get a loan?  Because banks are further under Fed control, now more in dominating American’s money through banks.

President Andrew Jackson went after the banking system for the very reasons Americans are crawling today: Jackson did not want a central banking system oppressing the American people, our money, and economy.  Jackson took Biddles, and the national bank, down and in the end paid off the national debt.  He was the only American president to ever do so.  A move modern presidents and legislators may want to follow if they care one iota about preserving the United States and capitalism.

That last sentence was purely to entertain myself with a good laugh.

Today’s October 5, 2009 Washington Times reports in a piece titled “Study: Bernanke, Paulson Misled Public Bailouts” that “…an audit released Monday by TARP Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky says senior government officials and Wall Street regulators, including Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson, had ‘affirmative concerns’ that several of the nine institutions were financially shaky.  By stating expressly that the ‘healthy’ institutions would be able to increase overall lending, Treasury may have created unrealistic expectations about the institutions’ condition and their ability to increase lending.”

This is according to the audit report.  The Times further states: “Treasury and the TARP program lost credibility when lending at those institutions did not in fact increase and when subsequent events—the further assistance needed by Citigroup and Bank of America being the most significant examples—demonstrated that at least some of those institutions were not in fact healthy.”

The Federal Reserve, like abortion, was never voted upon by the people or legislators.  And like abortion, the Fed has been a killer.  In the case of the Fed, it has been slowly killing capitalism and must be taken down before it has any chance of fully implementing Marxism to its fullest extreme.

If banks cannot lend (because they are forbidden imparting loans), money cannot be spent, therefore capital remains where the Fed and Washington want it: in the banks under management of a dominant hegemony manipulating funds for influence and power. 

If businesses cannot borrow, they cannot hire and job losses skyrocket, further empowering Democrats and liberals who need such power to take down America once and for all.  The Fed is their ultimate weapon.  Without money Americans cannot invest, hire, work, pay bills, move out of lower income ratios providing votes for liberals and Dems, and the country recedes backward toward an era of depression.

The Great Depression helped elect FDR.  Without it, he would never have been president.  He was too liberal, too anti-Semite, too big government for the American people.  But a bank collapse helped FDR create a depression he needed to implement welfare and regulations even the ultimate regulator Teddy Roosevelt couldn’t dream of.

The fear of another collapse enabled helped elect a Marxist liberal: Barry Obama.

The Fed promised that banks receiving $125 billion were “healthy” and sustainable.  Then why lend taxpayer’s dollars that further increase national debt?  Why place America behind China; America is borrowing the money from China.  Because it’s the only way for Obama and Democrat’s to implement Marxist plans begun by Teddy Roosevelt.

Timothy Geithner was head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York when the TARP was created; further pulling into question Obama’s and Democrat’s Marxist strategies.  Or do we even need question something so openly and purposely destructive toward America and capitalism?

It is wiser to fight against control than worry over what it will do and regret not combating to prevent the end of the Republic.

Low-incomers, incapable of repaying mortgages, were given home loans.  Interest rates were dropped to an all-time low—too low—in order that Democrats beloved poor would receive loans.  It was not a few people who contributed to the housing and banking collapse, it was thousands not financially capable of paying monthly mortgages. 

Many recipients of loans were illegal aliens.  Still, because it is considered racist not to give poor blacks and Hispanics home loans, low-incomers were granted what other Americans work hard and save years for: homes and loans.  It did not matter that taxpayers would foot the bill so long as Marxism prevailed.

That phrase cannot be overused.  Marxism is the cause of government control and financial failure in this country since 1913 and it must stop before it succeeds in stopping America.

The Fed is no more legal than the IRS.  Both were snuck in under the noses of the people.  Both have used the power of the Constitution to enact crippling and unfair laws that have nothing to do with Capitalism or America.  The Fed is the central control of every dime Americans earn and own and technically it does not have the right or authority.  It usurped that power illegally and the people have willingly gone along with the lie for 96 years.

Illegal power has been fought against and taken down in the past.  It can be once again.  Obama needs as many crises’ as he can create in order to remain president.  Without crisis Obama is nothing more than an inexperienced community organizer.

Lisa Richards Copyright © October 5, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

The Reason News Downplays The Tea Parties

By Lisa Richards

September 18, 2009

On September 11, 2009, I went to the Bridgeport, Connecticut Tea Party Express.  The rally was jam packed: citizens waving flags and banners calling for conservatism in America, demanding the stopping of the government controlled healthcare bill Obama wants rammed through Congress, banners reading no socialism, no Marxism, banners calling for the Fair Tax, banners denouncing Obama’s Czars, Obama’s liberal/Marxist policies, and Don’t Tread On Me banners were everywhere.

Americans want the country back.  Those who call Tea Parties racist are those who want the USA to become the USSA.

What I noticed immediately upon entering the Courthouse Square were large crowds that grew bigger by the minutes.  What struck me as great was the fact this crowd was a large mix of white AND black Americans waving flags and defending the founding.  The Connecticut Post, Fairfield County’s newspaper, never mentioned that fact.  The paper downplayed the entire event as being 100 people entertained by Ann Coulter.

September 11, 2009 was a cold, windy, rainy day, but hundreds packed Bridgeport’s Courthouse Square, standing on soggy, muddy grass.   We citizens ignored the cold, wet weather because America is more important than being warm and cozy while Obama attempts to turn America into a European-style Soviet Union of abortion on demand and illegal workers by command. 

The Connecticut Post completely ignored the truth about the rally, simply mentioning a few jokes told by Ann Coulter, which were true.  Ann was treated as nothing more than a stand-up comedian.  In truth, she gave an eloquent speech on behalf of conservatism and freedom from socialism.

Niger Innis was a guest speaker.  The Post mentioned only one quote, but failed to note the fact Niger said the crowd was not just whites, but whites and black conservatives, proving we Americans come in all colors, but are one people who love our founding.  The fact a black man had the nerve to point that out must be overlooked if we are to appease Barry Obama and the Black Panthers.

What is most insulting is the Post never mentioned our guest host and lead entertainer: Lloyd Marcus, the man who sings the “Tea Party Anthem.”  Lloyd must be snubbed and flouted because he is black-skinned, conservative, waves the flag and declares boldly: “Mr. President, My name is Lloyd Marcus; I am not an African-American, I am American!”

Lloyd’s patriotic passion for America is what makes America great.  He loves America, he fights for our traditional values, and he loves the founders and the Constitution and Declaration of Independence and does not want socialism from Barry Obama destroying this nation. 

Lloyd Marcus is a great American, but the Post completely dispensed; mentioning Lloyd might make blacks in the projects see they have been lied to. 

That is the real reason Tea Parties are downplayed in local papers and the elite media outlets: if inner city blacks see blacks hosting Tea Party rallies, telling the truth about what Democrats have done to blacks—shackled them to welfare-for-life in order to get their votes—black Americans will wake up, realizing they too are free Americans who should not allow themselves to be held down in the Democrat-built inner city projects: modern-day plantations with one purpose: strong-arming votes from the poor kept poor for Democrat power.

Black Americans spoke out against Barry Obama at the rally, holding up books they wrote before the election, exposing Obama and his cronies.  These Americans were brushed aside by the purposely oblivious Connecticut Post.  Heaven forbid welfare blacks, and Hispanics, discover they have been lied to for 50 years by the very people who promise to feed, cloth, and house them, convincing generations of Americans they cannot possibly take care of themselves, only Democrats can, and must, wipe the backsides of blacks, who are too dumb to do anything on their own.

That is the truth about Democrat’s view of minorities: they are too dumb to work, get educations and make their own way through life. 

Democrats and liberals drove black Americans into mental disability, insisting they must live off the government and white taxpayers who are evil.

Blacks hosting Tea Parties are taxpayers, educated men and women, who made it on their own.  They refuse to buy liberal lies that are nothing more than modern-day slavery for votes.

If liberal media and news outlets keep the eyes of blacks and Hispanics closed, there will be more poor minorities easily conned into voting Democrat for free food and housing.  If liberals convince white constituents it is good for blacks and Hispanics to be kept on government subsidies, the real plan for Marxism and race and class warfare is accomplished.

The 1960’s and early 70’s was rife with Black Panther violence, infusing race wars by lied-to blacks against whites.  Hatred was caused by lies.  There was no basis for blacks in America to hate whites, who were marching in droves during the Civil Rights Movement.  Segregation was not the entire nation, it was in itself segregated to one area of the country—the South—and not all Southerners were racist.

A small handful of people made all whites look racist.  The stigma was implemented by 60’s radicals who hated, and still hate, America.

German psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich told 1940’s Soviets “In order for communism to take hold, there must be a sexual revolution.”  Reich was correct: 1950’s beatniks fell in love with Reich’s radical ideology, pushing it forward.  Sexual revolutions create hatred and racism toward one’s nation.  In America’s case, the hate was, and is, toward white Founders because they were Christian traditionalists. 

Never mind the fact many Founders were black (wallbuilders.com), in order to destroy America, those once held back must be kept back or they will help bring America further forward to greater prosperity.

In the case of black Americans, if they are not held down, Christianity will explode and destroy Atheism.  Why; blacks have a strong Christian history in America.  Blacks overwhelmingly turn to Christ rather than Atheism.  If however, liberals convince blacks that Islam is their freedom and ticket to revenge for slavery they never experienced, radicals arise, violence against whites explodes, teen sex rises more, teen pregnancy becomes the norm and need for welfare, and America slips further into Marxism.  

This is why the media wants conservative Tea Party’s blacks ignored: a revolution against liberals will explode when ghettoed blacks realize liberals and democrats re-enslaved them, not white conservatives trying to reinvigorate America with freedom and liberty for all.

Lisa Richards Copyright © September 18, 2009 All Rights Reserved

Canine V. Richards

By Lisa Richards

September 14, 2009

According to liberal lunatic and Obama Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein, my dog should have the right to file a lawsuit against me if he so desires.  For what; punishing the spoiled, catered-to brat by forcing him to watch Keith Olberman and Anderson Cooper when he does naughty-naughty in the house?

The thought would be laughable if it was not true, but Sunstein literally wants animals to have lawsuit rights against human beings.  Sunstein wants pets to sue humans if the adorable fur balls feel we humans have been unfair to them: “Representatives of animals should be able to bring private suits to ensure that anticruelty and related laws are actually enforced.  Of course, any animals would be represented by human beings…”

Well thank God for that.  I would hate to think trial lawyers might lose money needed to pay off their mistresses.

There already are laws against animal abuse, but that is not what Sunstein is concerned with.  He does not want us Americans hunting, wearing, or eating Animals.  No does he want us cooping up our livestock, which would die if we left them to the wilds.

Sunstein further solidified his insanity by claiming that “…just like any other litigant who lacks ordinary competence; for example, the interests of children are protected by prosecutors and also by trustees and guardians in private litigation brought on by the children’s behalf…” 

Animals will, if Cass has his way, receive the same rights as children.  In which case, animals would have to be aborted up to late term, just prior to birth.  If Sunstein wants animals to have the same rights as children, he must allow animals identical laws: become victims of pedophiles, set free by liberal activist judges and the Supreme Court that now protects pedophiles from cruel accusations. 

To make matters crazier, Sunstein declared “If getting rid of the idea that animals are property is helpful in reducing suffering, then we should get rid of the idea that animals are property.”

Hey, why not, liberals did that for babies and look how many of those 50 million children discovered cures for diseases and went on to save animals from abuse.  But hey, it left a lot less children to be the victims of “property” by parents.

Sunstein is just one of Obama’s czars and quite possibly the craziest.  When lunatics make Van Jones appear sane, something is very wrong.  Sunstein is not lying about his intentions either.  He truly believes Fido and Fluffy should sue their owners for cruelty.

I take offense.  I should have the right to sue my five month-old Rottweiler for the fact he ate my living room, not to mention he ate the antique Persian rug that once graced the entrance hall, peed my dining room rug and chewed the legs on the antique Chippendale table, and turned my English gardens into a reenactment of the London Blitz.  Sorry Cass darling, but I contest.  My dog lives better than most people, including me, who, now lives in a sty in desperate need of reupholstering.

According to Republican spokesman Kevin McLaughlin, “Texas Senator John Cornyn finds numerous aspects of Mr. Sunstein’s record troubling, specifically the fact that he wants to establish legal ‘rights’ for livestock, wildlife and pets, which would enable animals to file lawsuits in American courts.”

Does that include the wild snakes in my gardens I beat to death with a giant shovel this spring when cleaning out the piles of leaves?  I consider whacking Satan quite necessary to my numerous rights as a woman.

On the subject of rights, the California Central Valley farmers deserve rights to grow food, but have had their farming rights destroyed by environmental nuts like Sunstein for the sake of a fish considered more important than humans in need of food.

I say the farmers of California exercise their Second Amendment rights and blow those fish out of the water the farmers are not allowed access to.

Sunstein is not only serious; he is attempting to pass legislation that would provide pets, livestock, and wildlife with the resources to take us Americans for everything we have—including them.  Foxnews.com reported: “Sunstein has spoken stridently in favor of allowing people the right to bring suit on behalf of animals in animal cruelty cases and to restrict what he calls the more horrific practices associated with industrial breeding and processing of animals for food.”

It is offensive for people like me to eat animals, it is unforgivable if an animal is aborted from its mother’s womb, it is however not odious, or aggressive, in any way, if women abort human children.

It should be noted that Cass Sunstein attended the esteemed Harvard School of Law at Harvard University.  Sunstein gave a speech at Harvard, promoting and encouraging banning animal testing for cosmetics, outlawing hunting in America, because it kills innocent animals, and asked all Americans to abstain from eating meat.

Does that include banning animals from hunting each other?  Sorry, but I refuse to prevent my cats from hunting and killing mice.  And the spoiled dog gets ground beef with his steamed rice. 

If liberals had brains, which they don’t since liberals are anal retentive and sit on their thoughts, they would understand animals cannot survive if hunters do not keep wildlife population controlled: too many animals in the wild mean lack of food.  That is cruelty.

And many Americans thought Sarah Palin was too inexperienced and dumb because she has five children and hunts.  Apparently all it takes to be considered intellectual in this nation is political advocacy for placing animals on the witness stand. 

What is pathetic is the fact Sunstein is regarded as worthy to serve in the White House.  Even more wretched is many Americans agree with Sunstein’s abnormal defense of animals, yet scream in outrage if women refuse to have abortions to murder as many unborn children as possible.  Without aborting humans, animals do not have room to roam the allegedly over-crowded planet.

Welcome to the land of Obama Czars and Smart Cars. 

This is the reason many Americans in all parties are turning out at Tea Party Rallies: Americans are sick and tired of lunatics running this nation that is supposed to be governed by the people, who have more sense than those with legislative titles wanting animals to rule.

Even Orwell can’t top this.

Lisa Richards Copyright © September 14, 2009 All Rights Reserved

www.lisa-richards.com

Obama Insiders Made Up Glenn Beck Boycott

By Lisa Richards

August 24, 2009