CONSERVATIVE VERSUS LIBERAL NEWS

What Radical Feminists Really Want: To Be Men

After 50 years on the market, the Pill has radical feminists angry it did not turn them into men. The Pill did not make women gender equal, it did not give women penises. Women are still popping pills and hoisting boobs into bras every morning like enslaved women.

50 years of the Pill and women still have breasts! Now that’s a true crime against humanity.

Radicals are furious women are still getting pregnant (despite the fact radical feminists encourage schools to teach children how to use condoms and simulate sex); after 50 years of radical feminism, why aren’t women evolving into men? The Pill did not liberate women from that nasty, girly body Feminazis try so hard to be rid of.

If one reads the June 21, 2010 New York Times column “Let The Pill Go Free,” by Kelly Blanchard, president of Ibis Reproductive Health, one easily makes the above assumption:

“LAST month, the 50th anniversary of the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the birth control pill was marked by a lot of discussion about the ways in which the pill has failed to deliver on its promises. It did not solve women’s problems juggling work and family life — nor did it end gender discrimination or eliminate unintended pregnancies. Clearly, approving the use of the pill was only the beginning of the effort to meet women’s contraception needs.”

Kelly, Darling, the Pill meets the needs it was invented for: prevent pregnancy and help women with medical problems requiring extra estrogen. You feminists are angry the Pill didn’t do what you really hoped it would: grow penises.

Friedan Mystics need Sweden to accomplish that, but that way is permanent: one can’t remove the penis whenever one wants to whore it up with men. After all, isn’t the whole idea of women being liberated: act like drunken frat boys, have sex with all the men—or women—you can. Now that’s being a woman!

Blanchard’s column was nonsensical. She protests the Pill for not making women gender equal, while objecting to the fact the Pill is a prescription drug, she insists need not be, despite side effect warnings Blanchard names:

“It’s true that the pill could be dangerous for women with certain conditions. Women who are 35 or older and smoke, and those with high blood pressure, are at greater risk of a heart attack or stroke if they take oral contraceptives that combine estrogen and progestin.”

Continue reading page: 1 2

The Potomac Troll Heads Back to the Bridge

The White House Press Corps front row seat is finally vacated. 89-year-old Potomac River Troll Helen Thomas has retired to her bridge from whence she came after decades of hissing at White House press secretaries and one last hurrah, snarling anti-Semitic remarks toward Israel, insisting Jews do not originate from the Middle East, but derive ancestrally from Europe and Palestinians own Israel.

Helen darling, trolls originate from Scandinavian mythology, so you should get the hell out of D.C. and back to the land of the Norse.

Many view Thomas as a mouthy old hag, the left however adore her and mourn the retirement of their “trailblazing” troll.

The Nation’s Katrina vanden Heuvel proclaimed:

“Columnist Helen Thomas, a trailblazer for women journalists and one of the few in the White House press corps who courageously questioned President Bush and other officials in his administration on war, torture and U.S. policy toward Israel…It is a sad ending to a legendary career…”

As what; the White House’s anti-Semitic gargoyle?

Daily Kos reporter Lawrence A. Welsh, describes Thomas as

“the greatest White House correspondent of all time,” insisting “One must view Helen Thomas’ comment in…context…She is of Lebanese heritage and understands well the Palestinian perspective on Israel.”

Thank heavens for that explanation! I thought the old hag was simply anti-Semitic.

Anna Clarke of Salon.com insists Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Howard Stern have all made “…despicable comments [and]…None of these voices seem to fear a forced retirement,” because they are young and male.

Politics Daily Carl M. Cannon dislikes Helen’s anti-Semitic remarks, but wonders if Helen’s age made her do it:

“Is the aging process…a rationale for what she said…she will turn 90 on August 4…One of the common symptoms of aging is a loss of cognitive ability that [makes people say] socially inappropriate [things].”

Basically if you’re a decrepit left-wing nuisance, you’re absolved of your life-long, “inappropriate,” “perspective” of hatred of Jews, because leftists worship anti-Semites—unless they’re 100 year-old Dixiecrats.

After decades of looking and listening to Helen Thomas hiss at White House press secretaries, I wonder if all Americans will be glad to see her leave or miss those daily installments of the White House version of Lord of the Rings.

The Potomac River Troll however can always find work at Sci/Fi conventions where trolls are always in popular demand.

If you news hounds are wondering why the White House Press Corps front row seat is empty today, it’s because 89-year-old Potomac River troll Helen Thomas, who slammed Israel and Jews on May 21 with her determination to rewrite ancient Jewish history and eliminating Jews from the desert, has retired.

Thomas’s retirement comes on the heels of anti-Semitic remarks toward Israel and accusations Jews do not originate from the Middle East but derive ancestrally from Europe. Thomas justified anti-Israeli/Anti-Semites by claiming Palestinians own Israel.

Thomas’s thinking claims Jews were non-existent in the Middle East until 1948 when they took over to occupy Palestinian deserts.

As bizarre as Thomas sounds, she is serious. Thomas spewed viscous remarks to Rabbilive.com when asked about Israel and Jews: “Tell them [Jews] to get the hell out of Palestine!”

Thomas made her comments with a smile and haggish giggle, further declaring: “Remember, these [Palestinians] people are occupied and it’s their land, it’s not Germany, it’s not Poland.”

When asked where all the Jews in Israel should go Thomas said: “They should go home to Poland and Germany.”

There goes all that sandy Florida property. It looks like Jews will have to pack up and head west to Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Apparently Moses crossed the Rhine, not the Red Sea, and did not wander the desert for 40 years, he and that band of Israelites were actually hiking the Alps to seek the Promised Land, which turns out to be Poland, not Israel, as assumed for the last 5,000 years. But hey, anyone could make that foolish, historical assumption when reading ancient historical scrolls.

Thomas apologized on her web site, but never asked forgiveness, making her expression of regret useless. She said exactly what she feels and she is not forgiven as she retires.

Thomas was scheduled to speak on June 14 at Walt Whitman High School in Bethesda, Maryland. The speech was cancelled due to her anti-Semitic remarks. In an apology, Thomas stated: “I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians. They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.”

Abraham H. Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League is not buying Thomas’s assumingly contrite appearance: “Her suggestion that Israelis should go back to Poland and Germany is bigoted and shows a profound ignorance of history. We believe Thomas needs to make a more forceful and sincere apology for the pain her remarks have caused.”

Demanding Jews “get the hell out of Palestine” disdainfully accuses them of stealing an entire region. Insisting they originate from Europe purposely falsifies history. This interpretation is a denunciation of Jewish history and abject hate of an entire race Thomas and other anti-Semites would never allow displayed toward Arabs.

As the Philistine Troll retires, many will be glad to see her get the hell out of the White House and hopefully go chew on her Cedars of Lebanon.

The Left marches against America, calling America a terrorist nation.

With all the fabulous places to hike in America and Europe, why would three Americans choose terror-sponsored states for a summer vacation? One can only assume they spent too much time hiking poppy fields before “accidentally” stumbling into a nation seeking world domination: Iran.

The U.S. cut off diplomatic ties to Iran in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution when 52 Americans were held captive for 444 days. Iran is not Palm Springs and Westerners aren’t welcomed with the Four Seasons treatment.

The Ayatollah chants “death to America,” Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad constantly threatens to attack America with nuclear weapons, he ordered Iranians protesting the tyrannical government to be arrested and killed, and his rule is violent: kidnapping Westerners, supporting those who murder Americans, and training in terrorism.

It’s not shocking three stupid hikers caught crossing Iranian borders face prison and possible death. David Horowitz explains why leftists believe terror states are not dangerous foes:

"The seeds of the contemporary opposition to the War on Terror were sown in the 1960s in the movement to oppose the Communist aggression in Vietnam…Now the West is engaged in a new war with a totalitarian enemy called radical Islam, which despises Western capitalism and democracies. And once again, totalitarianism finds its most dependable allies on college faculties…tenured radicals teach their students that ‘one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter,” and that America is “the world’s greatest terrorist state.’…that America’s terrorist enemies are in fact the voice of the world’s ‘oppressed,’ and that by challenging the United States they are advancing the cause of ‘social justice.’"

The hiker’s families naturally see the actions as harmless and pleaded Iran for their release, stating the three accidentally crossed Iraq’s borders into Iran. Secretary of the State Hillary Clinton declared:

"These three Americans—innocent tourists in Iraq’s Kurdistan region when they were detained on July 31, 2009—have been unjustly held for almost nine months without formal charges or access to legal representation. We ask the Islamic Republic of Iran to release these three Americans and allow them to go home and be reunited with their families."

Americans are warned by the U.S. State Department not to visit any nation threatening America unless absolutely necessary.

Hillary knows this, the hikers certainly knew, but, as David Horowitz explains, “The lessons of history are not readily learned,” and three hikers who crossed over Iraq’s borders into Iran have been held since July 2009, accused of espionage.

Neither Iraq nor Iran is friendly to Americans. Why visit unless you assume Islamic terror states are not as bad as they appear in jihadist’s Youtube videos?

Despite pleas from families and Hillary Clinton, Iran is not ready to release the hikers without a deal: release Iranian terrorists held in U.S. jails. The U.S., of course, has said no to the swap.

Perhaps Bill Clinton can fly to Iran on a “solely private mission,” cajole a “special pardon” for the hikers’ release, and hold a cushy press conference that makes terrorists look warm and friendly.

Leftists should reconsider non-terror states as vacation hot spots so the State Department can focus on its job versus rescuing ignorant sightseers.

Islam demonstrates its intentions for America

Tolerance for actual racists has run amok in America. Lockstepping to leftist philosophical ideology, no
matter how wrong, dangerous, idiotic, or racist, has infected America in high proportions.

Islam, the most xenophobic religion on earth attacked America on 9/11, massacring over 3,000 human beings, but the atrocity is meaningless to leftists, who cater to racist religions and organizations, while repudiating protection and preservation of America.

The latest slap in the face by government leftists comes from New York City: the Islamic organization Cordoba Initiative wants to build a 13-story Islamic mosque two blocks from Ground Zero, the section of New York City attacked by Islam. Mayor Michael Bloomberg rubbed salt in wounds stating:

It’s private property and the area is zoned for uses that include this [mosque proposal] one.

The land may be public zoning, but an Islamic mosque waves a red flag of hate to all Americans, 9/11 survivors, victims, and this country, which Islam proclaims it hates.

Debra Burlingame, co-founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America, told Fox News:

This is a place which is 600 feet from where almost 3,000 people were torn to pieces by Islamic extremists.… I think that it is incredibly insensitive and audacious really for them to build a mosque, not only on that site, but to do it specifically so that they could be in proximity to where that atrocity happened.

Just imagine a giant white cross erected at Ground Zero; leftists would riot in offended protest. Building a mosque next to Ground Zero is no different than raising a statue of Hitler in Crown Heights, Brooklyn: why not just shout, “I hate Jews!” Actually, that is what Islam asserts without reprimand.

Pamela Geller, executive director of Stop Islamization of America, demanded to know:

How can you build a shrine to the very ideology that brought down the World Trade Center? [This is] an insulting flag of conquest of Islamic supremacism.

It gets done because radicals run the government.

America is following Europe’s foolishness. Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer says, “Europe has for thirty years encouraged massive immigration from Muslim nations” practicing Islam’s violent Sharia Law. Mohammad cartoonists are threatened with murder. Theo Van Gogh was murdered for his film exposing the evils of Islam. Leftist tolerance allows fascist hate to spread, manifest, and live among us freely, forbidding non-Muslims freedom of speech.

Building a Ground Zero mosque is akin to Islam’s conquest of the Holy land: a mosque atop the Jewish Temple Mount, Palestinians intent on conquering Jews invaded Gaza, Muslims blowing up Israeli buses, cafes, and schools.

Geller further declared:

What could be more insulting and humiliating than a monster mosque in the shadow of the World Trade Center buildings that were brought down by an Islamic jihad attack? Any decent, American, Muslim or otherwise, wouldn’t dream of such an insult. It’s a stab in eye of America…it is time for Americans to stand up against the evil of Islamic jihad terrorism and Islamic supremacism. The only Muslim center that should be built in the shadow of the World Trade Center is one that is devoted to expunging the Koran and all Islamic teachings of the violent jihad that they prescribe, as well as all hateful texts and incitement to violence.

Hasn’t America witnessed enough Islamic terror without catering further to the religion of death? A Ground Zero mosque would hand over land bombed by Islam, to Islam, further surrendering America to terrorism.

Geller has planned a June 6 D-Day Rally in New York, protesting the mosque, asking Americans to stand against evil as they did during WWII against Nazism. There is no difference between Hitler’s Nazism and Islam: both hate Jews, both seek world takeover, annihilating those seen unfit for their version of civilization.

Conservative PM Cameron and Lib Dem Deputy PM Nick Clegg

UK PM Gordon Brown announced his resignation, recommending Queen Elizabeth appoint 43 year-old Conservative Party leader David Cameron as Prime Minister, who, prior to Brown’s announcement, told the BBC:

“It’s now decision time for the Liberal Democrats and I hope they will make the right decision to give this country the strong, stable government that it badly needs and badly needs quickly.”

The decision to move from Labour government to Conservative, appointing David Cameron to Prime Minister, took only one hour. Cameron took office immediately without any interim period.

Cameron’s appointment included a deal with Lib Dem Nick Clegg, now Deputy Prime Minister, for a new UK government. This leaves questions as to what these changes mean for British government. Cameron responded, telling the press:

“I aim to form a proper and full coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.”

Deputy Prime Minister Clegg spoke to unsure Lib Dems, stating:

“I want to assure you that I wouldn’t have entered into this agreement unless I was genuinely convinced that it offers a unique opportunity to deliver the kind of changes you and I believe in.”

Brown’s resignation comes on the heels of failed attempts to secure deals with the opposition. But will the new coalition make the UK stable?

On Thursday May 6, 2010, the Labour Government, along with other parties, lost the general election, failing to secure a coalition deal with the Liberal Democrat Party. The Conservative Party received the majority of parliament seats. A new government coalition now rests in the hands of the Tories and Lib Dems.

Cameron/Clegg Government: Is this Conservative or Liberal?

The new coalition government is made of two separate parties, each with their own manifestos. This is not the Thatcher government that eliminated welfare for life and ushered in privatization of business. Welfare will continue as will Tony Blair socialism, except two parties now work as one rather than duking it out on separate, competitive ideas that either creates strength or weakness.

Suggestions for government changes concern both sides. The Tories say they intend to cut government spending by £6bn before 2011, Lib Dems want income taxes increased by £10,000, while not raising the inheritance tax. Sky News reports Lib Dems say cutting government spending won’t help lower the deficit. Conservatives say they will not raise employee National Insurance, Libs Dems want all earning less £10,000 exempt from paying income tax, but do not support tax breaks for married couples. Conservatives want immigration into the UK capped and welfare and education reformed.

Will a coalition of opposite governments create a center-left or center-right parliament? And who will win out in deciding the voting system?

Many MP’s and voters worry the UK voting system will change from First-Past-The-Post system (winner take all—Under the current system, MPs must receive 50% of the votes in their constituency or face elimination form the race) desired by Conservatives, to the Alternative Vote system of Proportional Representation (elected seats in proportion to votes), wanted by Lib Dems. Cameron says he does not favor moving to proportional representation. According to the BBC:

“There will be a referendum on scrapping Britain’s first-past-the-post voting system in favour of the Alternative Vote method before the next general election.” Labour says they will let voters decide whether or not the UK should have a new voting system.

The next question: what kind of DVD’s will Obama give this UK PM? I don’t see much hope in retrieving Winston Churchill’s bust Obama hurled back at Gordon Brown.

When 24 year-old Muslim convert Carlos Bledsoe of Little Rock, a.k.a Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad, murdered Arkansas military recruiter Private William Long, Fox News and conservative talk radio were the only news outlets speaking out against the Islamic murderer who acted in the name of religion and the Koran.

MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC ignored Pvt. Long’s murder because a Muslim (liberal’s pet darlings never to be condemned for keeping the population under control via terrorist wars) is guilty and condemning a Muslim might offend followers of the religion of death.

Two weeks later elite news networks are reporting round-the-clock on PETA’s outrage over the murder of an innocent fly by the President of the United States. The news of the disease carrying bug has flashed across liberal news stations every hour as if the president himself had been squashed and flicked to the floor.

PETA condemned Obama for his inhumane actions toward a fly that landed on his hand during a CNBC White House interview. The filthy bug alighted upon the president, who looked down at the poor little thing and declared; “Get out of here!” Next Obama smacked the fly dead and flicked the lifeless creature to the floor. “That was pretty impressive,” Obama proudly declared, “wasn’t it? I got the sucker!”

So outraged is PETA over the horrific Dr. Tiller-like actions of Obama, they are sending the president a Katcha Bug Humane Bug Catcher. That is a bug-catching contraption that gently catches bugs, soothingly trapping them so one safely and tenderly releases the germ-carrier back into the world to bite and infect human beings liberals want covered with nets.

PETA’s spokesman Bruce Friedrich was devastated the president’s could act so inhumanely. After all murder are for babies not bacteria infested flies. Friedrich said: “We [PETA] support compassion even for the most curious, smallest and least sympathetic animals. We believe that people, where they can be compassionate, should be, for all animals.”

Friedrich went on to proclaim “Swatting a fly on TV indicates he’s [Obama] not perfect.

We’re happy to say that we wish he hadn’t.” Would PETA say the same about babies who survived abortions but were forced to die because Obama passed a bill making it legal to let an abortion survivor die?

Oh wait, unborn children are not perfect; they are unfit for survival. Silly me.

Friedrich declared PETA is very happy with Obama’s record on animal rights. Conservatives are elated with his track record on abortion.

All day and night Thursday June 18, 2009, the liberal elite media outlets mourned the loss of a fly the way they mourned Dr. Tiller’s death. Private William Long is still forgotten and unreported. Pvt. Long had the gall to dedicate his life to the U.S. Military, serving this nation, recruiting others wanting to serve and protect. The Muslim who murdered him has barely been criticized because he’s Muslim; calling his actions horrendous would slight the Islamic world trying to annihilate mankind.

That may explain why Obama got a free pass despite the hoopla over his killing a fly: he was raised Muslim, therefore he is permitted acquittal for killing something. Had George W. Bush smacked and flicked the fly and called it “sucker,” Bush would have been on trial for war crimes against insects.

The coverage of the death of a fly and the anger it has caused shows how much liberals actually hate human life. Obama supports every form of abortion, for that he’s praised. When he kills a fly he is condemned by liberals who care more about insects, rodents, trees, and animals.

As I write this column I would like PETA to know I killed a horse fly that invaded my house. I hate flies and proudly profess to smacking, swatting, squashing the dung-eating, unfit-to-live deviants under my shoes, and enjoyably pesticiding them to death. How did I kill this latest fly; when the freak of nature landed on my antique coffee table, which I love more than the life of insects, I smacked the thing dead it with a newspaper, scooped it up and flushed it the way liberals do aborted babies.

Liberals claim to be peaceful, loving human beings who care, but the opposite is true: they believe in murder, they riot and physically attack other’s when they march and protest war and the eating of meat.

Today PETA is marching against MacDonald’s, claiming the beef burger franchise is cruel to animals. There have been no marches in honor of Pvt. Long, demanding the death penalty for Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad’s cruelty. There are no demonstrations against Islam by liberals, asking America to stop tolerating terror. Pvt. Long is simply another notch in the belt of anti-war/anti-military liberals who claim to hate war and the death of troops, yet spit on those heroes when they return home.

By not covering Pvt. Long’s death and focusing on the death of an abortion doctor who murdered 60,000 babies and the death of a fly by the president, the liberal media has shown it’s true colors: they hate America, they hate the military, they don’t care a great and courageous young man died in the service to this great nation. The media completely rejects the fact Islam is a religion of death.

The media supports rogue dictators and socialist policies taking away civil and human rights. But heaven forbid the president kill a fly.

The lack of press coverage toward Pvt. Long and mass coverage of a dead fly is not just the fault of liberals: conservatives are not fighting hard enough for this nation. Conservatives have sat back, silent, in fear of being called racist, mean, nasty, and intolerant, letting liberals get away with exactly those things for decades: taking America’s civil rights.

Liberals fight like rabid dogs for Marxist policies. Conservatives need to stand up and speak out loud, march against Obama’s government and liberalism destroying the standard of American living.

Conservatives must fight the media, because the media decides who leads this nation and how criminals will or will not be tried while ignoring murders of innocent Americans.

Liberals are nothing more than flies infecting this nation with racism and violence. Liberals are at fault for murderers let loose on society, pedophiles handed protective rights, freeing terrorists, Black Panthers harassing voters, illegal immigration, and the nearing of the end of this nation’s founding if conservatives do not stand up and speak out, not caring how rhetoric is perceived.

According to Miss Universe Pageant owner Donald Trump, Miss California Carrie Prejean will keep her crown and title despite the pageant saying she broke rules by not disclosing semi-nude photos of her bare back.

The Miss USA team said their reason for wanting Miss California to renounce her title was semi-nude photos forbidden for any contestant to take part in. Miss USA contestants must be traditional congenial good girls. That may be true, but Miss Rhode Island posed semi-nude, revealing more than the panty-clad bare-backed Miss California and no one in the pageant had a problem with Miss Rhode Island’s photos. Miss Rhode Island’s racy frontal semi-nude photos were perfectly acceptable under the morality rules.

Immorality happens when decent beauty queens defend traditional marriage, stating they can not and do not support gay marriage. That is immoral and grounds for losing the crown given to America’s ethically principled role models.

No doubt Miss California would have walked away unscathed without the controversial publicity making her out to be homophobic had she told pageant judge Perez Hilton she shares the same views toward gay marriage as President Barry Obama: marriage should be between a man and woman only. Hilton and the pageant would have shut up immediately or face admission they voted for a liberal president who disagrees with the very reason the pageant wanted Miss California fired: not believing in same sex marriage

Donald Trump did not give into the predisposed pageant Prima Donnas intent on making a political statement promoting gay marriage. Trump said “the pictures [of Miss California] are fine… [and] Carrie will remain Miss California.” Trump’s siding with Miss California, allowing her to keep her crown, opens doors for all traditional pageant queens, making it allowable to display honesty about their beliefs when asked political questions meant to rid the pageant and America of conservative beauty queens.

In today’s society, morally upright beauty queens are dangerous for young girls. Imagine young America girls wanting to emulate brains, beauty, and integrity instead of perfect hair. America might become home to legitimate children born to intellectual exemplar female paradigms who smile when they fell like it.

Prejean may have broke rules by not disclosing her underwear promotion photos, but that is not the real reason Miss USA went after her. If semi-nude photos were the real issue the pageant would have put Miss Rhode Island on the slaughter block. Prejean told the nation she supports conventional time-honored marriage, does not believe gays should marry, she informed America that she was raised to believe marriage is between a man and woman and Hilton and pageant officials did not like the conservative answer.

Miss California broke the rules of liberalism: thou shall forsake God, Christianity, country, morals, traditional values, along with everything else that made America great.

Semi-nude photos technically broke a contracted rule, but that was not the reason for wanting Miss California fired. Hilton himself claims Prejean was ahead of every contestant in the pageant until she gave him her no to gay marriage answer. Miss Rhode Island would have been facing the same punishment had she given a no gay marriage answer.

The entire maneuver is about liberal political correctness with an agenda to destroy traditional American values.

The strong-arming strategy has entered beauty pageants. Women are not allowed to think for themselves, they must give scripted answers. Carrie Prejean knew she was expected to follow the rules of robotic rhetoric when answering. She chose to be honest and speak from the heart.

Miss California’s answer angered Perez Hilton and gay activists across America who made Prejean out to be Hitler in a tiara. It was liberals who acted like Nazi’s. They went after Prejean with venom, trying to destroy her life.

For one month liberals and gay activists have shown intolerance toward a fellow free-thinking American. The very idea conservatives do what liberals and gays demand all people do for and toward them—exercise free speech, be individual, think free, be your selves, don’t follow the crowd—was condemned as hate by the so-called lenient.

Miss California’s following the moderate standards was considered fanatically bigoted.

The small-minded prejudice displayed toward Miss California proves liberals do not believe in free speech for anyone except themselves.

Donald Trump did the right thing. He took a stance supporting an honest woman who thinks for herself and not according to political correctness. Those are standards young women need to see from beauty queens. Young America girls must have role models who stand up for what is right, not caving into society’s ideology just to win a diamond crown and title of queen.

Miss California is officially a pariah. She is condemned as an intolerant, gay-hating, homophobic bitch because she believes marriage is between a man and woman. Worse: Miss California gave pageant judge, gay queen Perez Hilton, the conservative answer concerning gay marriage. Now Hilton is on a campaign to destroy an honest woman who with guts to think for her self, answering what she believes versus pageant political correctness.

Miss California is being harassed by pageant officials claiming she had no right giving such an answer. Keith Lewis co-executive director of Miss CA told the Perez Hilton’s blog: “As USA and one of the leaders of the Miss CA family, I am personally saddened and hurt that Miss CA USA 2009 believes marriage rights belong only to a man and a woman. Although I believe all religions should be able to ordain what unions they see fit, I do not believe our government should be able to discriminate against anyone. Religious beliefs have no place in politics in the Miss CA family.”

Miss U.S.A. should change its title to Miss Communist/Socialist/Progressives since the pageant obviously rejects the American rights of free speech and freedom of religion.

Miss California, Carrie Prejean, told the media she does not “regret” her answer “at all,” further stating: “I was raised in a way that you can never compromise your beliefs and your opinions for anything.”

Prejean’s sister, who agrees with same sex marriage is sticking up for her sister, saying:

“I’m not offended by anything that you [Prejean] said. We have two different opinions and I love you because of it. I love you because you stood up for what was right, and it’s not a matter of being gay or not gay, it’s a matter of you competing for Miss USA and getting a question and answering it to the best of your ability.”

So far not one member of any feminist movement has come forward defending Miss California. Should readers be surprised feminists are not standing by a traditionalist; no. Did feminists endorse Sarah Palin when she joined McCain’s campaign; no, they called her incompetent, dumb, too sexy, too beautiful, not experienced despite being a two-time Mayor, gas company board member, and governor of Alaska. Feminists hate Palin because she is pro-life, refused to abort her Down-Syndrome child feminists consider unfit for society, did not hide her pregnant daughter, or make Bristol have an abortion in secret to save Palin’s political career, and Palin does what Freidan Nazi’s can’t and wish they could do: shoot a real gun rather than their moronic mouths.

Today’s feminists are not Suffrage Women; they are not Harriet Tubman or Sojourner Truth types. Today’s feminists are not Ayn Rand, Claire Booth Luce, Phyllis Schlafly, Abigail Adams, and Margaret Thatcher. Modern feminists are Margaret Singer proto-types following the holy gospel of Betty Friedan’s “Feminine Mystic” of aborting gender all together.

Sarah Palin stood up for traditionalism, giving modern, conventional, conservative women such as myself a political voice speaking for us and defending us from public office. Miss California proved beautiful women wearing tiaras do not have to be robotic imbeciles answering pathetic poverty questions expected of them in order to win the giant crown.

Miss California stood up for her beliefs, answering a question that actually has no right or wrong answer; how the query is answered simply depends upon the person’s individual God-given inalienable rights and beliefs, not public scrutiny or political correctness. Unless of course liberals really do secretly love Hitler as I have often wondered.

In 1774 Jefferson stated: “A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”

In 1817, Jefferson told John Manners: “The evidence of [the] natural right [of expatriation], like that of our right to life, liberty, the use of our faculties, the pursuit of happiness, is not left to the feeble and sophistical investigations of reason, but is impressed on the sense of every man. We do not claim these under the charters of kings or legislators, but under the King of Kings.”

In 1819 Thomas Jefferson declared to Isaac H. Tiffany: “Of liberty I would say that, in the whole plenitude of its extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will. But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law,’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.”

What Miss California did was exercise her individual, free rights to religion and speech written in the Constitution. Perez Hilton and the Miss U.S.A. Pageant disavowed those laws and Miss California lost. Hilton told the press he was “floored by Miss California’s answer…she alienated millions of gay and lesbian Americans, their families and their supporters. She lost it because of that question. She was definitely the front-runner before that.” Hilton admits he disqualified Carrie Prejean for being honest and traditional and conservative with Christian values he obviously hates.

Miss California is not backing down despite pressure to retract her statement: “It did cost me my crown. I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that’s all I can do.” She further told Today’s Show Matt Lauer: “I was attacked for giving my own opinion on the stage of the Miss USA contest. And I’m going to do whatever it takes to protect marriage. It’s something that is very dear to my heart.”

Miss California showed up in D.C. at the National Organization for Marriage to launch a campaign supporting and protecting traditional marriage, while fighting to stop gay marriage: “I’m just here to protect marriage. The National Organization for Marriage basically just respects marriage and people who support it. That’s what I’m here to do today, to protect traditional marriage.”

Isn’t that what all of us should do; be honest about our beliefs? Gays expect heterosexuals to accept them as gay, but they refuse to endure and tolerate what they consider bowing to: traditional, conservative values.

It goes both ways. Conservatives have not shown disrespect toward gays. Conservatives don’t throw gays out of the public arena. Conservatives do what Jesus would do: show love and respect. We simply believe marriage and children should be between a man and woman only. Conservatives have the right to disavow gay marriage and call it wrong as much as gays have the right to fight for what they want. But don’t expect us conservatives to back down from our Christian beliefs just to make gays happy.

Conservatives do not become violent, attacking gays for their life-style. Gays came out during Rick Warren protests, reacting violently toward Christians, who, quietly stood holding Bibles and picket signs, supporting traditional marriage, by beating up on people gays demand accept them as gay.

If gays like Queen Hilton expect anyone in this country to show respect to gays, then he and his fellow ladies in waiting need to reciprocate.

Miss California did the right thing: she was honest versus kissing the backside of a tiara coveting queen who hates conservatives. Prejean knew her answer might cost her the crown; she was more concerned with her standing in her faith and standing as a female role model to all women who need to reject the demand to forgo womanhood for the Sergeant Singers and Freidan Nazi’s.

Two weeks later and feminists are still silent. Now if we could only silence the razor-rejecters.

Last week, during the Miss USA Pageant, gay queen Perez Hilton asked Miss California about her stance on gay marriage: “Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?” Miss California answered the gay judge (obviously angry over the fact he’ll never be crowned a real queen) honestly: “We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I …believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”

Miss California lost the crown Perez Hilton, an angry gay blogger with an obvious axe to grind toward heterosexuals and conservatives because he wants the Miss USA crown placed on his head.

I had no idea who Perez Hilton is until now. I assumed the pronunciation of Perez was a tongue-tied elocution of Paris Hilton’s first name. It turns out Perez Hilton is a gay blogger who makes the real Hilton appear intelligent.

After the beauty queen lost the pageant, the gay queen went on Youtube acting like Henry the VIII with rabies. Hilton’s tirade made him look like a snarling James Carville. Hilton finger pointed at the camera, yelling: “She [Miss California] lost not because she doesn’t believe in gay marriage, Miss California lost because she’s a dumb bitch. Hilton said in his angry If that girl would have won Miss USA, I would have gone up on stage, I sh** you not... snatched that tiara off her head and run out the door.”

And there we have it: an angry gay man who wants a tiara so bad he would have tackled a traditional-minded, free-thinking, honest, beauty queen for the crown, had she won.

Hilton insists Miss California did not lose the crown because of her answer, he claims she lost because her answer: “it was the worst answer in beauty pageant history.”

As opposed to last year’s teen queen who, when asked about Iraq and the war, gave an answer about poor people, not even knowing Iraq is an actual country and not something on the back of a pick-up truck.

Why would Hilton claim an honest, articulate answer was the worst answer in pageant history unless he is a heterophobic who hates conservatives and anyone with traditional views?

Perez Hilton continues claiming he did not discount Miss California for her answer and beliefs of marriage. The gay queen told Larry King: “I was given this opportunity on this national platform to ask a question that I thought was relevant. And given the recent setbacks and advances that we’ve made in the fight for gay marriage I thought it was a very important question, for me specifically to ask. It wasn’t meant to be a big bomb, and I don’t think it was that hard of a question either.”

That answer right there proves Hilton disqualified Miss California because she is against Gay Marriage and supports Proposition 8, also fully supported and backed by the majority of California voters.

Miss California specifically stated she is proud to live in a country where people are free to choose their own individual life-styles, but for herself, she is a traditionalist who believes in traditional marriage.

There was no anti-gay rhetoric hidden beneath that answer. Honesty was finally displayed in a pageant where women always blindly state they want to feed all the little hungry children and end poverty in China and Africa blah, blah, blah.

How many years has America heard that rehearsed answer, wishing, just once, the pageant would turn out one woman who had guts to say what she thinks, feels, and believes?

Miss California told the press: “I didn’t give the answer that he [Hilton] would have wanted me to give. I said, ‘You know what, I’m laying it out on the table, this is who I am and this is what I believe in and I’m going to stand by what I believe.”

Hilton has simply made an ass of himself. He hoped to make conservatives appear anti-gay and homophobic. Conservatives have never tossed gays out of the political or public arena, conservatives are not anti-gay, nor are we homophobic because we do not believe in gay marriage or gays adopting children. That’s not anti-gay, that’s outspoken honesty about moral views, just as gays are outspoken about their life-style choices. Conservatives do not care who is gay or straight, we’re concerned about holding onto core values this nation was founded on: God.

And guess what Hilton, God actually loves gays, he just doesn’t like the homosexual act anymore than He dislikes sex outside of marriage or infidelity committed by married couples. It’s the act itself darling Perez, not the person.

Hilton is a radical gay who wants to make Miss California the poster child for gay-haters. The truth is Perez Hilton is hateful and simply makes gays appear nuts, pardon the pun.

Gays need to separate themselves from Perez Hilton if they want all Americans to respect them. Conservatives do not dislike gays, but Hilton makes all gays look like radical crazies trying to destroy the nation. Most Americans can differentiate between radical gays and those who simply keep their lives private, love America, and do not want public spectacles made of sex. Hilton is not in that group. Hilton is trying to create a firestorm like the San Francisco church-crashers. It’s all about anger and hate, and it is obvious Hilton is full of both. Possibly even toward him self.

The firestorm against Miss California has backfired. America loves Miss California for being honest. How gays are perceived depends upon gays like talk radio host and conservative supporter Tammy Bruce standing up to Hilton and saying Hilton does not speak for all gays.

On the other hand, I would like to lock Perez Hilton in a room with the Bush-supporting Tammy Bruce and let her crown the queen.

According to the latest and absurd news polls, Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin is simply too beautiful to be a politician. And Barney Frank’s sexy looks and poetic vocalizations have him banned from the House floor. Look out Helen Thomas, you’re next babe.

The journalistic imbeciles we trust to deliver news declared that Independent and Republican voters focused so much on Governor Palin’s beauty, they simply could not bring them selves to vote for her. Instead, voters chose the guy, whom, a bikini-clad bimbo danced and sang about her obsessed “crush on Obama,” while tabloid press photos displayed a bare-chested Obama emerging from the surf, describing him as “sexy.”

What a shame Katherine Harris, Condoleezza Rice, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, and Mary Matalin all look like Mary’s husband or they might have had a chance in politics. Maybe one of them could have worked in the White House or held a cabinet position.

According to journalist Tom Jacobs, who wrote an article on Santa Barbara’s Miller-McCune Center website, college students at the University of South Florida were polled by the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology on why they thought Palin lost the race. Note I said college students. That would be your average pot-smoking drunks majoring in chugging and encompassing the rhetorical speaking skills of Paris Hilton. Yet pollsters and psychologists believe 20 year-olds, who think Andrew Jackson is Michael’s brother, can explain the reason McCain/Palin lost to Obama.

The next time anyone wonders what is wrong with society; it’s because sociologists and psychologists decide what the standard norm is for the social order of humanity.

Los Angeles Times reporter Andrew Malcolm wrote in his column “Top Of The Ticket:” a “new study suggests hot Sarah Palin should dowdy down for 2012”if she wants to be the President of the United States…Newly released academic research suggests that Sarah Palin’s sexiness, while great for selling copies of Vogue magazine and political buttons about the hottest governor from the coldest state last fall, may actually have hurt her vote-getting ability, which seems to be what elections are about.”

And Hillary’s hot bod in those yellow bell hop pantsuits won her the primary. That’s why she’s president and Barry Obama is not. Palin made it to the primaries; Hillary was tossed aside for Joe Biden.

Malcolm pointed out: “Of course, standing next to John McCain is bound to make pretty much anyone look pretty much prettier. Which may be one reason the crowds often chanted “Sar-RAH! Sa-RAH!” when the Republican governor and Republican senator appeared together as the GOP presidential ticket.” No, it had nothing to do with Palin’s looks compared to the dowdy McCain. Palin had crowds chanting her name because she’s a true conservative and conservatives finally found another Goldwater and Reagan.

Psychologist Nathan Heflick helped research the so-called findings, noting Palin’s actual looks did not turn voters away at the polls, “It was the effect her appearance had on their [voters] perception of her competence and humanity. Those variables made people less likely to vote for her.” In other words, if you’re ugly you are competent for the office of vice president and president, if you’re beautiful, you’re a bungling nihilist.

Malcolm pointed out that in the students polled, “…at least among a select group of students there, those who found the hockey mom more attractive also judged her less competent, less intelligent and less capable…All of which would seem to suggest that, for any hope of success in 2012 or beyond, the 45-year-old governor needs to whack off that hair, pork up a bit and get some cheap, baggy pantsuits over at the Wasilla Wal-Mart. And instead of that come-on wink that many thought they liked, she’d do well to develop an uncontrollable facial twitch.”

That is journalist lingo for “you need to achieve the Hillary look if you want to be president.” If the above analysis is as scholarly as it is struggling to be, why are liberals and Democrats falling all over Obama, calling him the “most fit president,” showing off those bare-chested photos like he’s the Sport’s Illustrated Swimsuit model of the year, describing Obama as “sexy,” or as Bernie Goldberg states: having a “slobbering love affair” with Obama. Yet Sarah Palin is too attractive to run the country?

These are the very same dim-wits oohing and ahing over Michele Obama’s bare arms and shoulders and the attractive attire she wears. How many journalists and psychologists have the guts to tell a black woman she’s too beautiful to be First Lady and ought to “pork it up a bit” as to not offend hairy arm-pitted lesbians.

Andrew Malcolm had more advice for America’s favorite mom: “…lose the kids, stop smiling, get angrier, so she can look more congressional. That’s been working real well for Republicans the last two elections.”

Considering the fact no one hates children and mothers more than pro-life conservatives, Malcolm and the shrinks may be on to something.

Republican Governor Sarah Palin won the 2006 election. I think it had something to do with her success as a two-term mayor and crack-down tough boss who eliminated corruption in the Alaskan Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, not her looks.

SIR TED KENNEDY,

KNIGHT IN FOUR FEET OF WATER

BY LISA RICHARDS

MARCH 6, 2009

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has officially knighted Senator Ted Kennedy for his life time of service to the state of Massachusetts and U.S. Senate. Apparently all it takes for one to be a pseudo-member of aristocracy is a life time of alcohol, drunk driving, and drowning one’s passengers while saving one’s own life for the sake of last call.

Ted Kennedy is no paragon of virtue, but Massachusetts continuously reelects the old drunk, looked upon with saintly adoration, because his last name is Kennedy and his brother was the Democrat’s hero president, who, dragged America into a war Democrats loved until they began to look as inept as they truly are. That is when Democrats began to protest a war their hero needed to make up for the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

The Kennedy name makes Kennedy’s untouchable. They drown innocent women; lobotomize family members they regard as inferior to the Kennedy race, support Adolph Hitler, cheat on their wives habitually, a cause of hereditary heresy, take drugs, drink, drive while drugged and drunk, stand trial for rape and murder, and continue to be revered as American royalty. And the lineage began in a seedy Boston bar. That site is no doubt the Democrat’s official Lourdes.

Ted Kennedy has done nothing good or right for this nation throughout his entire career. Actually that’s not true. He’s an excellent swimmer. Sir Ted is responsible for the 1965 Immigration Act and the Hart-Celler Bill which allowed immigrants to illegally invade the U.S. by the droves. Kennedy supports tax hikes, abortion, drove his ex-wife to drink—he cheated on Joan Kennedy with the woman he murdered—but has not been excommunicated for breaking any of his Catholicism’s Seven Sacraments. He supports tax welfare, socialized medicine, and endorsed Barry Obama, the worst president in U.S. history after only six weeks in office. The list of Teddy law-breaking and deviance goes on, but I wouldn’t want to insult a pretend royal.

Kennedy will not be allowed to be called Sir Ted, he is not actually British but American. As if not being aristocracy ever stopped the Kennedys from thinking they’re royalty. If dad Joe Sr. could buy his way into American society what is to stop the rest from filching titles that don’t exist in the United States. Even the title drunk and murderer seems to be an honor for the Kennedy’s and their voters.

Now that Ted Kennedy has brain cancer it is essential everyone look the other way on his naughtiness. Prime Minister Gordon Brown told the press Kennedy helped to reinforce peace in Northern Ireland. How, by bribing the IRA with whiskey? The Prime Minister thanked Kennedy for growing American healthcare and education for all the world’s children: “And for all those things we owe a debt to the life and courage of Senator Edward Kennedy…” Well the “courage” part is correct. It takes a lot of daring audacity to drive over a bridge versus across to dry land. It took extraordinary bravery to leave his mistress drowning in his car, in four feet of water, while he swam to shore so he would not miss last call at a party.

What a guy.

As for healthcare and education, it is Democrats like Ted Kennedy who has destroyed both those freedoms of choice in this great nation by turning them into government-run institutions dictating what Americans can and can not learn and ingest to save their lives without Washington’s permission.

How long before Democrats decide that Americans can not educate themselves on those two topics?

Teddy could not be on hand for his pretend induction into royalty, but stated “[I am] deeply grateful to her majesty the queen and to Prime Minister Brown for this extraordinary honor.” Her majesty the queen does not have any political power whatsoever in Great Britain. Queen Elizabeth’s role is simply ceremonial, which means Gordon Brown, the liberal mothball of labor lunacy decided to kiss the fat backside of an American socialist for his life-long endeavors toward British collectivism.

No darlings, that’s not exactly Irish. It’s very Kennedy.

Sir Ted’s father Joe Sr., the biggest social climber in U.S. history (he bought his family’s invite into the country club), once said the title of Knight was: “a reflection not only of my public life, but of things that profoundly matter to me as an individual.” Would that be his support for Adolph Hitler that ruined his chances at ever becoming president?

Who is next on the Knighthood list; Barry Obama for his extraordinary talents at collapsing a county’s economy? Perhaps the queen can knight Joe Biden for his astonishing historical knowledge and Al Gore for his peculiar discovery of climate change.

It is too bad another queen named Elizabeth wasn’t in charge of Great Britain. Kennedy would not be receiving a knighthood.

www.lisa-richards.com

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, better known as ACORN, has come under further investigation for continuing voter registration fraud. Yesterday Nevada State authorities seized computer records from a Las Vegas organization that drums up low-income voter registration and uses false and duplicate names in an effort to create more votes for the Democrat Party.

Complaints flooded Nevada’s Secretary of the State’s office with accusations of “erroneous” registration by the group known as ACORN. According to Fox news’ Eric Shawn: “The group was submitting the information through a voter sign-up drive known as Project Vote;” Bob Walsh, spokesman for the Nevada Secretary of the State said: “Some of them [the voter registers] used nonexistent names, some of them used false addresses and some of them were duplicates of previously filed applications.” Phony registration used to fill up democrat voter registrations for ACORN includes names of Dallas Cowboys Tony Romo and Terrell Owens. Tony Romo is not registered to vote in Nevada and Terrell Owens can not vote until November 4, 2008.

The Nevada raid happened at 9:30 am Nevada time. Eight computers and 20 boxes with documents were confiscated from the organization’s offices. ACORN interim Chief Organizer Bertha Lewis denies any illegal activity, claiming ACORN always “identified suspicious applications…separated them out and flagged them for election officials. We have zero tolerance for fraudulent registrations. We immediately dismiss employees we suspect of submitting fraudulent registrations.” ACORN insists Tuesday’s raid is nothing more than a political stunt against ACORN to “discredit our work registering Nevadans and distracting us from the important work ahead of getting every eligible voter to the polls.”

Al Gore pulled the same stunt when he allowed New York Jews living in Florida to vote with their absentee New York State ballots and also vote in Florida during the 2000 election. The double counterfeit votes were counted, the military was discounted, and Bush won despite democrat’s deceitful attempts to steal the election.

Tuesday’s raid is part of an on-going investigation: there are nine previous raids on ACORN. The voter fraud extends to Wisconsin, New Mexico, Indiana, Nevada, Michigan, North Carolina and Ohio. The charlatan voters registering in all ACORN states are low-income minorities allowed to register more than once in order to gain extra votes for Obama.

I was allowed one registration when I turned 18. Since then I have not been allowed to reregister despite the fact WASP is technically four different things.

Washington Secretary of the State Sam Reed said ACORN pulled off the “worse case of election fraud in the state’s history” in 2006: ACORN entered 1,800 voter registration forms containing 1,794 bogus names. In January of 2008 ACORN submitted 27,000 fake names that were pulled from the registration list. Thus far the organization is allowed to continue.

Matthew Henderson, the Southwest Regional Director for ACORN, insists it is difficult to control how people register: “this is hard work and there were some people that probably sat down on a couch and filled out names out of a phone book. That’s really what we’re talking about here, not an attempt to steal an election.”

In other words thousands of Americans have no idea who they are; they must open a telephone directory and pick from the bunch.

ACORN registered 1.3 million low-income voters across the U.S. for the November 4 election. Most names are fake or duplicated frequently. If republicans pulled ACORN’s stunt McCain and Palin would be off the ballots. Anything criminally done to put Barry Obama in the White House is racially necessary to overcome the great white oppressors who don’t allow colored people to vote.

Democrats attempt anything for votes. New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin is infamous for offering free hotdogs and soda pop to low-incomers if they hopped on buses and went to the polls and voted democrat. When it came to bussing his people out of the city away from Hurricane Katrina Nagin left his busses and people to sink in the flooding tides.

Courting the homeless vote is popular with democrats. Associated Press writer Stephen Majors reported in September of 2008: “Democrat Barack Obama’s presidential campaign blitzed bars and advocates for the homeless [in Columbus, Ohio] have lined up vans to ferry potential voters from shelters. The prize could be thousands of traditionally elusive voters in hard-fought Ohio who would have the chance to register and vote on the same day, if the courts don’t intervene.”

Majors described the homeless as having trouble getting to the polls to vote. That would be false since democrats are hawks when it comes to getting anyone they can to vote, including the dead.

In early October the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless obtained vans to drive to homeless shelters and “round up” 2,000 people for the polls. Majors reported that 17 shelters also provided “transportation.”

Majors noted a law stating “Ohio’s Republican-controlled legislature passed a bill in 2005 that enabled all registered voters to vote absentee without providing a reason, beginning Tuesday [in September 2008]. The deadline for registering isn’t until Oct. 6, so Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner ruled there is a six-day window in which voters can register and vote at the same time.”

The above law has partisan interpretation preventing officials from checking the authenticity of voter registration.

Obama’s campaign went so far as to offer free rock concerts to con uneducated college students into voting. It’s amazing how the promise to see John Legend sing has students convinced Obama would actually pay everyone’s college tuition. Then again these scholarly illiterates, whose hands America’s future is in, believe the government should fund their educations. With that attitude the younger generation just might join the homeless.

Voter fraud is common with democrats, yet no matter how many times illegal activity is reported democrats cry racism; they insist republicans simply don’t want low-income votes. The truth is opposite: democrats want low-incomers to vote democrat so they can keep them poor and beholden, republicans want low-incomers to rise above their means, get educations and succeed.

The fraud is Barry Obama and his pals at ACORN who, not only commit voter fraud, they strong-armed banks into force-lending to low-income minorities who could not pay mortgages American taxpayers are stuck footing the bill for. Obama’s scheming racketeering can not be allowed in the White House where he would store up socialist acorns.

WARREN BUFFET TO BAIL OUT GOLDMAN SACHS

BY LISA RICHARDS

SEPTEMBER 24, 2007

Billionaire Warren Buffet says he is betting $5 billion on Wall Street investment bankers Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Group Inc. is said to invest $5 billion and buy another $5 billion in common stock from the investment house. When Buffet announced his betting, Goldman raised 2.5 billion of its own stocks to the investment. The news sent Goldman shares soaring 5% Tuesday along with the stock index futures in electronic trading.

In the 1980’s, Buffett invested in another Wall Street group, Salomon Brothers Inc. When Salomon was caught biding on U.S. treasury bonds in 1991, Buffet stepped in as interim chairman to reach a company settlement before retiring from Salomon. Today Salomon is Citigroup.

I’m no fan of Buffet; the man is pro-death-tax, which means he believes all should be taxed for the death of loved ones; not to mention he is an Obama supporting liberal. Americans should not be charged for the death of family members. That’s not capitalism, that’s socialism. However, Buffet’s bail-out is capitalism at its best. His latest move is the way markets are supposed to receive help—with private funds.

What Buffet is actually doing in bailing out Goldman Sachs is purchasing value. The crisis is a buying opportunity for those with the wealth to secure the banks. Investors understand this tactic; it does not involve using other people’s money, taxpayers are not used, investors use their own collateral as security. In return investors make money. It is not illegal, it is not greed, private bail-outs are not attacks on Main Street or the American people as federal bail-outs will be, using private money is the best way to save the markets and the economy without hurting the rest of the country. Private rescuing enables the average investor a chance to bet when companies are secure. In the end every body wins.

When the wealthy top 5% use their own money to secure drowning companies everyone wins because only those putting up the bond do the paying. Buffet’s betting on Goldman Sachs is wiser than a government investment. The government will make the people pay for what the government caused when it lowered interest rates so low cheap money was created and handed out like Halloween candy. Now the country is suffering from an abscessed molar it can’t afford.

The economic down-turn benefits the government; private investors benefit themselves and the country by putting up their own funds to rescue that which most Americans can not.

Buffet is the private sector, he can do whatever he wants with his money. The government has no right to use the people’s money to clean up the government’s mess. The markets and the economy are better off when people like Buffet invest their money in failing economy. The old axiom of buy low sell high is true: investors make the economy rise because they use their capital to build money. The federal government works against the private sector via the IRS after it mismanages.

Wall Street belongs to the private sector—the people. Wall Street runs on investors of all financial status placing bets on companies. When company stocks rise the investor gains. Whether those people are billionaires, millionaires, or middle-class investors spending to become wealthy, those disbursed dollars belong to the people. The smartest way out of this mess is when those with the most invest in companies that are still salvageable. In doing so, smaller investors will buy stock and the markets will rise. The people win and the government must take the backseat where it belongs.

Government oversights and regulations on Goldman and other companies that stay afloat will continue with tougher regulations. Though companies will have greater access to borrowing federal money, they will not be able generate high profits seen by other tanked companies. The FED will restrict huge payoffs in proprietary trading, using borrowed funds for high-stake commodity investments—oil, money, real-estate. Most of these companies invested in commodities they knew nothing about. And they used the investor’s money.

The oversight committees however are socialist; ways to control the markets the people are supposed to control with their own money. Too much regulation will wind up over taxing the people; it will place restrictions on what the private sector can and can not bet on. The democrats are trying to control and impede the markets further via big brother. Democrats do not want the private sector bailing out Wall Street, but that is how business should be taken care of—by the people, not the government that will check and control capitalism.

Warren Buffet saw an opportunity to buy up stock in a tanking company. He did not call Ben Bernake or Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson for the help; Buffet is using his own money. That is called capitalism; it is not robbing; it is the way financial guarantees should take place. Any other way hampers with limitations; any other way is disastrous for the economy. But isn’t that what democrats want?

The naysayer liberals will call the liberal Buffet a robber baron securing the so-called robber barons for his and their gain. The top 5% are not the only investors; most Americans have stocks and bonds invested for the future. That would mean all Americans are capitalist thieves. Once again, whose money is Buffet using; yours, mine, or his?

Hopefully Buffet’s move will cause a chain reaction from all investors capable of betting on Wall Street. If the people ban together to rescue their own money, the people will have more say over the regulating over-sighters trying to limit capitalism. It’s time to reign in Washington and regulate them. Wall Street supplies Main Street’s money. Tell Washington to take its hands off America’s wallet.

www.lisa-richards.com

IT’S 1979 ALL OVER AGAIN:

AND ONCE AGAIN LIBERALS DON’T CARE

BY LISA RICHARDS

March 30, 2007

In 1979 Americans were herded out of the U.S./Iranian Embassy blindfolded and shoved like cattle into a crowd of mad, screaming Iranian student killers demanding the death of America? The bearded teenager in the lead is Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad and he’s at it again. This time he has taken 15 allies hostage—the British Royal Navy and Marines. Once again, as in 1979, liberals don’t care that patriots have been cuffed and stuffed and forced to wear Islamic clothing while humiliated into denouncing Britain and the West on national TV.

Liberals hate the military and anyone loyal to their country. Anyone who believes in the goals of freedom for all is evil in the eyes of Islam and liberals not protesting for the immediate release of British military hostages. Liberals want the hostages imprisoned for one reason: they support war against terror and fighting terror in Iraq. Liberals believe Saddam should have been left alone to continue raping, pillaging and killing humanity.

Case in point: Rosie O’Donnell told The View watchers “There were 15 British sailors and marines who apparently went into Iranian waters. And they were seized by the Iranians. And I have one thing to say. Golf of Tonkin!" I have one thing to say to Barbara Walters: get rid of the Token village wacko who knows absolutely nothing about politics and foreign policy.

Rosie O’Donnell implyed Prime Minister Tony Blair, President Bush’s greatest Ally in the War on Terror and in Iraq, planned to have Iranians board and seize his British Naval ship, kidnapping soldiers in an attempt to escalate the Iraq War for his and George Bush’s careers so they can make themselves look like heroes when they make a rescue.

Liberals hate America and Britain, they hate the Military because it fights terror and frees the innocent liberals believe should have simply been aborted to stop over population and global warming. Liberals don’t think Iran is evil, they believe Iran actually has a conscience and taking humans hostage is a necessary evil for Iran to continue its rightful violence.

If liberals didn’t believe in violence, their anti-war “peace” marches wouldn’t be violent riots attacking innocent bystanders.

Even Madeline Albright is worried the U.S. Navy might escalate the war if the U.S. tries to rescue the 15 soldiers. As if a rescue would become the cause of Islam hating the West. Bush and Blair did not ask Ahmadinedjad to send his Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps to steal a ship and take the crew so the war could become more violent. Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad and Islam have done a fine job at terrorizing the world for 28 years without any help from anyone.

The attack on the HMS Cornwall was due to Iran not wanting the ship to stop and inspect a DHOW freighter in Iraqi waters—not Iran’s waters; it’s been proven the naval ship was not invading Iranian waters. Iran’s IRGC simply wanted to stop the Cornwall’s officers from discovering cargo heading to Mahdist terrorist forces provoking British and American military fighting the war in Iraq.

So far the U.S. government has not responded the way Tony Blair responded to the U.S. on September 11, 2001: “Whatever help you need you’ve got it mates. Great Britain is on your side to fight and we’re joining you without you having to ask.” Blair has been fighting along side the U.S. for five and half years despite destroying his political career and popularity. Tony Blair is a loyal friend and stand up guy who needs America’s help. We should do exactly what he did for us: “Need help; you’ve got it mate.”

Iran is holding friends hostage, forcing a female soldier to wear Muslim clothing, making ther look like subservient Muslim women. Islam has strong-armed Leading Seaman Faye Turney to denounce Britain in support of Tehran’s terrorism.

Faye Turney is a dedicated soldier to the U.K. and the War on Terror. Faye Turney is a hero, yet Iran can not declare war upon Miss Turney, she’s a woman, and under Mahdi rules, making war upon a woman is useless to their cause, women are lowly slaves to men.

The IRGC supported the 9/11 attacks. America has been fighting these thugs in Iraq trying to take over the Middle East. The IRGC is from Tehran, they support Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade—all Jew killing Palestinians.

And liberals like Rosie blame America, not the IRGC and the Mahdi’s.

Tehran is a rabid dog with AK-47 Kalashnikov’s. These rabid dogs are called the Partisans of the Mahdi. Mahdi’s are known as Twelvers who follow a cult that believes their leader the Invisable Mahdi disappeared long ago in Mesopotamia and will return to take over the world.

Iran released our hostages after 444 days of Carterism because Iran feared Roanld Reagan. Iran knew what Reagan would do to them if they didn’t comply. Reagan struck Iranian forces in the Gulf after the release. He struck Iran’s oil tankers. Reagan was not going to let Iran get away with taking Americans. Reagan did not reward evil, he got even with it.

America and Britain have a chance to stand up to Iran and show Iran it’s not the world power. America has a chance to defend its friend and ally as it did in WWII, showing Iran we will do to them what Reagan did.

The worst thing America and Britain can do is not retaliate.

FREE SCOOTER; ARREST SANDY

BY LISA RICHARDS

January 18, 2007

Former Advisor to President Bush and Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney I “Scooter” Libby is set to go on trial for indictment in the CIA leek of operative Valerie Plame.

Libby is accused of perjury and obstruction of justice for lying to FBI agents seeking out the person who exposed Valerie Plame’s name to reporter Bob Novak.

During the trial audio recordings may be released by the Supreme Court for the public to hear. There’s no reason that kind of evidence should be admitted to the public when it belongs solely inside the courts.

NBC’s Tim Russert is expected to testify since Libby allegedly spoke to Russert and the discussion is said to be on the tapes.

Vice President Cheney will testify on behalf of his friend he has insisted is innocent.

The feeding frenzy has already begun; liberals are just shy of calling for a public hanging they can video phone for the internet.

Scooter Libby is not the leaker of Valerie Plame’s name, Dick Armitage, the Former number two official at the State Department admitted in 2006 he is the person who exposed Plame’s name to reporters. Armitage has never been indicted nor arrested.

Joe Wilson, who has spent three and half years insisting his wife was publicly outed, because President Bush supposedly had it in for Wilson, because he’s a former member of the Clinton Administration, and told Bush Nigeria did not have “Yellow Cake” Uranium, has not once called for Armitage’s arrest.

Scooter is the fall guy Wilson and democrats want fried. Scooter Libby was Vice President Cheney’s Chief of Staff, democrats hate the former Halliburton boss they want imprisoned for once owning stock in an oil company he helped run.

Only Al Gore is allowed to own millions of shares in oil companies.

Democrats won't call for the arrest and indictment of Bill Clinton’s former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger who admitted to stealing secret documents from the National Archive Vaults in 2003.

Berger entered the vault without a security guard, which is illegal; even the President of the United States can not enter the vault without security.

Berger was alone in the vaults, the guard outside apparently never watched what Berger was doing.

Sandy Berger himself entered the vaults to steal classified documents in connection to President Clinton and the 9/11 Commission, which wanted to know what Clinton knew about Osama bin Laden. Berger claims he was able to sneak the documents out of the National Archives by stuffing them in his pants and underwear after shredding three of the documents with scissors. (Washington Times. April 5, 2005).

What is about the Clinton Administration and men’s pants?

After Berger left with his briefs s lined with briefs, Berger claimed to have lost the documents which were immediately—after a given amount of time—recognized as “missing.”

At one point Berger claimed to dispose the documents he claimed to lose; then the documents were said to have been misplaced somehow with no remembrance of their locale.

Berger claims he was simply trying to help Bill Clinton’s testimony at the 9/11 Commission. When told of the theft Clinton was reported to have laughed the incident off as “an honest mistake.” (Washington Times. April 5, 2005).

I guess stealing White House furniture and paintings was also an honest mistake.

The report Berger stole was a document written by Richard Clarke titled “After-Action.” It is a detailed report of the 2000 millennium terror plot against the U.S. and considered to be so highly classified no one can legally remove the document without it locked inside a handcuffed suitcase and guard in tow.

Berger’s next crime was lying to FED’s about the destruction of three documents and others used for panty liners. Berger told the Washington Times he was sorry, what he did was wrong. That was in 2005, two years after the crime.

Berger was slapped with a $10,000 dollar fine and no jail time. Martha Stewart paid a fortune for lying to FED’s about a stock dumping, lost her CBS show and position at her magazine, went to prison, and then house arrest because she was a violent threat to American produce markets.

Watch out fruit stands this lady packs meat tenderizer.

Berger publicly apologized more than Hugh Grant. Suddenly, within a month’s time, Berger was “forgotten” in lieu of the Democratic National Convention, during which time, Martha Stewart was being crucified for lying to the FBI about a piddly amount of stock which quadrupled a year and half later after it fell and made millions for stockholders.

Ironically, John Kerry, who called Berger his friend during the scandal, began sending out press releases during his campaign, asking if Vice President Cheney and RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie concocted the entire scandal as political timing during the Democratic National Convention in order to “smear the Kerry campaign.” (Fox News. July, 22, 2004).

Cheney didn’t want anyone knowing Clinton’s reactions to terrorist threats, it might make Bush look good.

What is assumed is Berger destroyed references that Clinton and his Administration made about terrorism in 2000 before leaving office. Richard Clarke states in the missing documents that he criticized Clinton’s approaches to handling terrorist plots against the U.S.

If any other member of Washington politics—President, Vice President, Senator, Congressman, government employee had committed Berger’s theft, that person would be in prison right now.

Martha Stewart went to prison for nearly one year and served house arrest with an ankle bracelet. Scooter Libby is indicted for a crime Richard Armitage admits to committing. In the meantime Sandy Berger gets away with something a president can be arrested, indicted, and impeached for violating.

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

FROM RUSSIA WITH A LITTLE LOVE:

AND A LOT OF POISON

BY LISA RICHARDS

November 30, 2006

The Russians don’t negotiate with those they dislike or those they feel have done them wrong; they simply invite you to dinner and poison you to death with nuke soup. On November 23, 2006 former KGB agent and former cohort and ex-pal to ex-KGB agent Vladimir Putin Alexander Litvinenko died in a London hospital from high doses of Polonium-210 poisoning. A pellet of the rare radioactive substance was allegedly placed in a bowl of soup Litvinenko ate the night he was poisoned. Doctors discovered the pellet of Polonium in Litvnineko’s body when he was dying in the hospital.

On Litvinenko’s death bed the 43 year-old declared Prime Minister Vladimir Putin poisoned him in order to silence him for what he knows about Putin—that the Kremlin blew up the Moscow apartment buildings Chechen terrorists are said to have bombed. Litvinenko claims the KGB ordered him to assassinate Boris Berezovsky, he refused and the Kremlin blew up the apartment buildings making it look like a Chechen terror attack. Litvinenko claims the KGB planned his death.

Litvinenko told the press that on November 1^st three British Airways flights had Russian contacts aboard who met him in London. British Home Secretary John Reid stated “two planes show low levels of radioactive substances.” The other plane shows no radioactive levels. Now any of the 33,000 passengers who flew aboard those three planes throughout the three weeks must be on the look out for symptoms of radiation poisoning.

After Alexander Litvinenko died his anti-Putin pal Alex Goldfarb held a press conference letting Putin know “You may succeed in silencing one man, but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr. Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life.” Goldfarb went on to make the claim he might be next in the poison soup line by stating: ‘You may succeed in silencing me, but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed.”

As Pat Buchanan noted: “Certainly, the oligarchs and robber barons like Berezovsky—many of them now dispossessed of the wealth they amassed in a collapsing Soviet Union, and all of whom have been run out of the country or imprisoned—have the most powerful of motives. They hate Putin and seek to bring him down. And Goldfarb and Litvinenko both enjoyed the patronage of the billionaire Berezovsky.”

True, the two men didn’t live like paupers after the collapse of the Soviet Union. They lived well off Berezovsky’s money. The question is what would Litvinenko gain from pointing a finger at Putin? If Putin did have Polonium-210 dropped in Litvinenko’s soup; how can one prove it? Who’s going to tattle on Putin?

Scotland Yard is looking into suicide martyrdom as the possible reason Litninenko is dead. Perhaps he killed himself to make Putin and the Kremlin look like vicious killers under a spy dictator.

As if you have to kill yourself to make that claim appear realistic.

Litvinenko himself was KGB and no boy scout so one has to wonder if the old KGB-ers are knocking each other off to silence those who speak out. What a shock that would be. How terribly sad it would be for the world to lose men so adept at killing people who speak out against crimes.

Litvinenko may have spoken out against Putin, but Litvinenko was a hit man like all KGB. He silenced those who spoke out against Mother Russia and the U.S.S.R. and he was also an FSB—Federal Security Bureau—agent. So his poisoning should not come as a shock to anyone.

In 1999, Alexander Litvinenko publicly declared his identity saying the KGB had it out for him because he refused to assassinate Russian Billionaire Boris Berezovsky—one of the many billionaires exiled to Siberia who kept Litvinenko in the life of comfort after the Hammer and Sickle was removed from the top of the Kremlin. Litvinenko was imprisoned for nine months for “abusing his office” After his release, the former KGB/FSB was deported. In 2000 Litvinenko went to England for asylum where he took up his soap-box tirade against Putin and the KGB.

Litvinenko is not the first to die by horrific means. In 1979, Bulgarian anti-communist Georgi Markov, a playwright of Russian satire exposing the KGB bosses was murdered in London by a Ricin poison-tipped umbrella after he made a broadcast on London radio against “Communist elites” living very wealthy life-styles while the people suffered.

October of 2006: Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya was brutally murdered after exposing Putin and his government as pro-communist KGB killers still silencing the people. Politkovskaya’s murder is unsolved and Russians who sided with Miss Politkovskyaya say her murder will never truly be investigated because of things she uncovered on the Russian government.

There is also the lone survivor of Russian poisoning Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko. In 2004, Yushchenko, an anti-Communist, pro-Western, pro-Democracy, pro-American Opposition Leader fell ill to Dioxin poisoning Vienna doctors said “was administered by a third party.”

Yushchenko’s illness became deadly with no hope of a cure. However, he pulled through due to Vienna doctor’s vigilance and was elected President. Yushchenko pointed the finger at Russia and Putin saying he “was the victim of a murder plot to settle political scores against him.”

November 30, 2006 former Russian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidor died mysteriously of poison.

Russia is not a democracy despite what Putin and his cronies would like the world to think. Mikhail Gorbechev may have pushed hard for Glasnost and succeeded in getting newspapers to print secret information he handed them on corrupt leaders, but Gorbechev didn’t end it—President Ronald Reagan did by demanding Gorbechev “tear down the wall.”

Gorbechev may have wanted democracy, but he wanted democracy in the form of Socialism. And nothing Reagan said to the Russian leader could convince Gorbechev Socialism is part of Communism. Thus Communism in fact never truly died. Now the problem is men like Putin refuse to let go of their former life-style.

Those men—Putin and former KGB bosses and agents—enacted private ownership with profits to certain individuals—like Putin—from those who had gained the money when the Soviet Union collapsed and were sent to Siberia as punishment for their wealth. The reason for stealing their money was to resurrect the old Soviet Union. Putin has made it clear he longs “for the glory days of Mother Russia.”

President Bush needs to take a longer, harder look into the eyes of Putin. That wasn’t Putin’s soul Bush saw.

Now we have former Russian KGB agents, Russian journalists, and former Soviet leaders dropping like flies in weird cloak and dagger scenarios right out of an Agatha Christie novel.

My advice to Ex-Russian bad-boys and anti-Communists: have the waiter taste the food first.

Copyrite November 30, 2006 Lisa Richards

THE UNITED NATIONS:

AMERICA’S OFFICIAL MENTAL INSTITUTION

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 22, 2006

Venezuelan oil terrorist President Hugo Chavez and Iranian terror President Mahmoud Amadinejad had mental breakdowns at the U.N. It was nutty than Saddam Hussein’s circus trial and Tucker Carlson “dancing with the stars.”

The Lithium deficiency began Wednesday September 21^st with Hugo Chavez suffering great difficulty at the UN podium because President Bush stood in that exact same place the day before. Apparently his demonic stench of fire and brimstone continued to permeate the air.

“The devil was here yesterday!” Chavez ranted to a thrilled crowed of communistic terror fans. “Look,” declared the psycho using hand gestures to describe his difficulty standing where Bush stood. “It still smells of sulfur today.” The hand and face gestures were those of Scarlett O’Hara’s Aunt Pitty Pat who was stricken with the vapors when she noticed the widowed Scarlett dancing with Rhett Buttler at the Confederate Charity ball.

Yes, Chavez had the back of one hand to his forehead ala’ Pitty Pat.

All around Chavez, Ambassadors and world leaders emphatically shook their heads yes in agreement. The devil had invaded the UN, and he’s from Texas.

If you were looking for entertainment, Wednesday and Thursday’s UN speeches by Chavez and Ahmadinejad took the fruit cake to a whole new level of crazy.

At one point Chavez turned into Jesse Jackson, decrying Bush as a racist who tried to drown black Southerners, telling blacks they were the original Americans like the Australian Aborigines, and White Europeans invaded America making blacks their slaves. Chaves went on to let blacks know whites still hold them in slavery.

Thursday Hugo Chavez visited Harlem to let Blacks know just how enslaved they are by handing our free, cheap oil to heat their homes Bush refuses to heat, forcing blacks in Harlem to freeze every winter because he hates blacks.

Poor Oprah she has to shop at the Good Will.

Chevez went on to announce “President Bush is an alcoholic and a very sick man. He’s like John Wayne!” The Harlem crowd cheered that one.

For the record Hugo telling us yanks we’re like John Wayne is probably the best compliment you could bestow an American.

Chavez called America an evil empire which “is on its way down.” According to Chaves; the U.S. “will be finished soon.” The UN applause for Chavez’ comments were uproarious. I thought the Yankees won the World Series until I remembered it’s only September and I was watching the UN.

Bush’s Tuesday speech on the other hand received stern taciturnity. The leader’s reaction to Bush was muzzled muteness. Chavez received such royal treatment Charles and Camilla would be jealous. Kofi was so touched, he broke out the Psalms and all sang praises to the lord.

Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad carried the outrageous idiocy and Aunt Pitty Pat moments into Thursday’s speech. The squatty little terrorist declared with hands over his heart he’s “at a loss about how Iran can prove it has a peaceful nuclear program.” The thug said nuclear warfare is over and he would never hide anything from the U.N. or President Bush. He told his beloved UN audience he has always told Bush and weapons inspectors they are welcome to inspect his country. The UN clapped. Kofi cried tears of joy. Jesus had returned!

Pat Robertson was right when he said: “I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he [Chavez] thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war…this man is a terrific danger…This is in our sphere of influence [South America], so we can't let this happen. We have the Monroe Doctrine; we have other doctrines that we have announced. And without question, this is a dangerous enemy to our south, controlling a huge pool of oil that could hurt us very badly. We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”

The United Nations is one gigantic insane asylum housing hundreds of terrorist thug rulers. Saddam had a seat at the U.N., Chavez, Ahmadinejad, Asad Bashir of Syria, Putin, and Chirac. Yasser Arafat was the prince of the U.N. and deeply mourned when he finally bit dust.

This is the organization who loves Fidel Castro and African warlords. This is the nation whose so-called aid workers rape little African girls for sport, gave Saddam 22 billion to rebuild Babylon rather than feed his people, has never fed Africa or fought HIV AID’s—America does that and Bush has given more money for the two than any president—and supports Communism while crying outrage when America wants to stop “evil empires.”

The U.N. has never done anything good for the world. Everything listed as accomplishments in their phony resume never happened. It is simply promotional propagandist lies the world believes. The United States is the nation who always comes to the rescue and aid of those in need, those in bondage and those not strong enough to fight. The U.S. gives the money, food and medicine. The U.S. is sends the missionaries and doctors to aid the poor. And the U.S. rebuilds everybody’s nation while letting its own nation sit back and wait for repairs.

The only difference between the U.N. and Belleview is one injects crazies with Lithium and Thorzine; the other ingests Champagne and Scotch.

Copyrite September 22, 2006 Lisa Richards

50 Years Later and the Pill Still Hasn’t Given Feminists the Penises they were Promised!

Helen Thomas Gets Back under Her Bridge

If You Hike in Iran, Don’t Expect VIP Treatment

Why Not Build a Memorial to Hitler in New York City’s Crown Heights?

Labour Pains Deliver Coalition Government to UK