THE NUTS REMOVE THE BOLTON
BY LISA RICHARDS
December 6, 2006
Last Week Donald
Trump complained when the U.N. declared it needed a face-lift to repair the crumbling building. The money to repair the U.N.
will cost billions and of course come out of the pockets of New York City tax
payer’s pockets. Trump thinks that’s crazy to spend billions on repairs when the U.N. could be knocked down and
rebuilt brand, spanking new for about 65 million.
The UN is not
listening to Donald Trump; they want the billions for repairs. Repairs for food money perhaps?
So what is the
point of me mentioning Donald Trump when the title so obviously tells you I am going to discuss John Bolton; I’ll tell
you.
The United Nations
is the largest mob-run organization in the world. In its 61 years of existence it has taken in hundreds of billions of dollars
to feed the poor, doctor the sick and stop genocide and dictatorships from destroying humanity. Yet in those many decades
since the UN began; all those horrors have increased.
When the U.N.
began in 1945 replacing the League of Nations at the signing of the United Nations Charter by 51 countries;
there was no AID’s crisis in Africa or any place in the world for that matter. Yet the epidemic
has exploded into a pandemic across Africa alone over the last twenty years.
The U.N. which
apparently is helping the AID’s crisis through the billions it demands the U.S. government hand over yearly for the
purpose sending Sesame Street puppets affected with HIV AID’s to Africa to tell little Africans not to have sex with
everyone or they’ll get AID’s; tells the world Africans are dropping daily like flies from the pandemic.
Then there is
the U.N.’s favorite bleeding heart do-gooder Bono insisting America is not doing enough to stop AID’s and hunger
in Africa. Bono even went to the White House as an Ambassador to explain to Bush he and America
need to stop the AID’s crisis in Africa.
The U.N. and
Bono insist the U.S. is not giving enough money to stop the
spread of AID’s. Of course the U.N. and Bono never tell Africans to stop whoring like rabbits. And Bono never questions
what the U.N. and their African cohort leaders are doing with the billions sent annually to Africa.
Its America’s
fault people can’t stop having sex and spreading AID’s.
You don’t
think the real problem could be the fact the U.N. pockets every dollar it receives through extortion and bribes while turning
a blind eye to genocide and disease do you?
Let’s look
at a few of the many scandals the U.N is involved in.
First there’s
the Oil For Food scandal in which the UN handed Saddam Hussein 22 billion dollars to “feed” his people in exchange
for “oil.”
Saddam Hussein
and his sons spent every dime on themselves and their palaces while they starved, tortured, raped and murdered the Iraqi people.
Kofi Annan’s
son Kojo suddenly left his position in the Oil For Food department when the stolen 22 billion was uncovered. Kojo has since
been quietly swept under daddy’s Persian rugs.
Next, U.N. big-wig
Paul Volcker took $950,000 dollars in bribes in order to obtain $79 million in U.N. contracts. Hey, the man ran up a huge
tab at the Russian Tea Room and needed a new limo to take up New York street
space.
Then we have
a strange little company called the IHC doing business with the U.N. Mysteriously, the IHC was removed from U.N. rosters in
June of 2005. That’s because it’s connected to Saddam Hussein and an Al Qaeda financier named Englebert Schreiber,
Jr.
Incidentally,
Schreiber is part of the Oil For Food Scandal.
The IHC is also
connected to Petra Navigation Group—one off Saddam Hussein’s many companies. PNG was a registered vender for the
U.N. in early 2003.
Wasn’t
that the time Bush invaded Iraq. It makes one wonder how Saddam
could have hid WMD’s. You don’t think these mysterious companies which suddenly disappeared off U.N. rosters could
have helped do you?
Then we have
Russian connections. You can’t be a proper thug unless you’re connected to the leaders of all Rogues.
United Nation’s
Russian Official Alexander Yakovlev channeled secret funds to an off-shore account.
Then there is
the head of the U.N. Budget Oversight Committee, Vladimir Kuznetsov who laundered hundreds of thousands in bribes he took
for contracts with the U.N.
The U.N. is connected
with businessman Ahmed Idris Nasreddin; a member of the terrorist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood. Engelbert
Schreiber is also connected to the brotherhood.
We also have
Vladmir Putin making strange nuke deals with Kim Jung IL and Iran’s
Ahmadinedjad. Also, Russian missiles were discovered in Iraq
when the U.S. invaded in 2003. The missiles were not old.
The U.N. refuses to investigate Putin,
The U.N. also
allows Iran—a monstrous terror nation a seat on the
council.
The U.N. gave
Saddam Hussein 17 Resolutions that declared he be nice to his people. In the meantime; Saddam killed upward of two million
human beings and the U.N. continuously handed Resolutions like Halloween candy to the Butcher of Baghdad.
When Bush went
to the U.N. for invasion approval; the U.N. had a stroke. The Ambassadors of genocide voted for number 18. Bush rightly answered
no.
That was six
months before the invasion. The U.N. would not let Bush invade until U.N. inspectors scoured the Iraq
countryside to find WMD’s. Six months later inspectors gave Saddam an A+.
Not once did
the U.N. listen when Bush demanded invasion before Saddam hid his weapons. Instead, the U.N. gave Saddam six months to hide
his crimes.
Not once in 25
years did U.N. Inspectors discover the tens of thousands of mass graves. U.S.
troops found the bodies after Iraqis revealed their loved ones had disappeared and they feared they were dead and buried.
Why didn’t
inspectors listen to those claims which turned out to be true?
As conspiratorial
as this sounds; it’s because the U.N. knew and didn’t care as long as they received their bribe money.
The U.N. is in
on every crime imaginable happening in the world; and they have Hollywood actors and rock stars as
their Ambassadors conning liberal America into believing the
U.N. is a charitable organization. Too themselves they are.
Has the U.N.
ever tried to rescue American women held hostage in Saudi Arabia?
No. Has the U.N. put a stop to human trafficking? No.
Why should they,
they traffic too as seen in the worst scandal by far; the scandal involving U.N. Aid Workers in the Congo who spend their
pass-times raping little girls without repercussion.
It’s not
new; it’s been going on for years according to victims who told reporters they were lured into bushes and rural fields
by the men who were sent to feed and cloth them. Each victim gave the same scenario to Fox News’ Steve Harrigan: men
bribing little girls with candy. What child doesn’t like candy?
So far none of
the aid Workers have been arrested, prosecuted and jailed.
At U.N. headquarters,
many women came forward to report sexual abuse inside the Upper East-Side organization. So far, no one has been arrested,
prosecuted and jailed for the crimes. The women were raped and molested by men the law never seems to be able to touch.
Then a year and
a half ago, President Bush decided enough was enough and nominated a man the U.N. hates—John Bolton—as Ambassador,
Envoy and overseer.
Bolton’s
nomination caused gnashing of the teeth at the tainted U.N. gates. Liberals in the Senate and House froze in shock over the
idea of Bush nominating a man with a reputation for law-abiding, tough-mindedness who reprimands bad behavior.
Worse, Condoleeza
Rice said John Bolton was known to lose his temper when people didn’t follow the rules of the law.
Whoa! No one
has the right to tell Kofi Annan and his mobster thug molesters they must adhere the law. Who did Bush think he was; the President.
Bolton
was not a fan of multilateralism. Oops. Liberals didn’t like that; conservatives however did.
Bolton was critical
of the U.N. and its many wrongs he was never afraid of exposing to the Senate refusing to hear the truth about their one,
true hope of world rule.
So when the Senate
tried to block Bolton’s nomination, declaring anyone with a bad temper should be banned from
the hallowed halls of thievery; Bush simply gave the Senate the finger and appointed John Bolton to the U.N. without a vote.
For a year and
a half Bolton has been tough. More cover-ups have been exposed; and Kofi Annan has had a watch dog
breathing down his Brioni suited neck.
Then, on Monday December 2, 2006, President Bush unhappily announced John Bolton resigned his post.
The New York Times and Washington Post reacted with glee. Peter Baker and Glenn
Kessler of the Post titled their December 5th (pg. A01) column: “Bush Wary of Battle With Democrats;”
further stating “President Bush surrendered to congressional foes yesterday in his fight to install John R. Bolton as
permanent ambassador to the United Nations, a harbinger of how the political world has changed since Democrats captured both
houses of Congress.”
Helen Cooper of the New York Times, stated December 4, 2006 that “President George W. Bush on Monday accepted
the resignation of his fiery, blunt and conservative ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, conceding that the envoy
could not win Senate confirmation and signaling that the administration was unwilling to make another end-run around Congress
in order to keep Bolton at the United Nations.”
Baker and Kessler claim John Bolton
and President Bush didn’t want to “provoke an early confrontation with Democrats as they take over Congress next
month.”
Bolton
and Bush not confront? One guy confronted Saddam Hussein when Democrats cried leave him alone; he might get mad. The other
confronted Kofi Annan daily when Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton screamed leave the crook alone or you’re
fired.
Surrendered my
ass! Rush Limbaugh is so correct in calling the press the “drive-by media.” They are all a bunch of pessimistic,
nay-saying, hit-and-run liberals who can’t give conservatives credit for anything good.
When a conservative
steps down; it means Bush failed and yes Virginia; their really is a Santa Claus.
Bush
wasn’t acting defeated Monday; his unhappiness appeared more like annoyance toward Democrats who don’t want law-abiding
people in power telling law-breakers to behave.
“I'm not happy about
it, I think he [Bolton] deserved to be confirmed.” is what Bush declared. Bush said Bolton
deserved the chance to have an up or down vote. Bolton never received what the Senate is understood
to perform by law. “They chose to obstruct his confirmation, even though he enjoys majority
support in the Senate, and even though their tactics will disrupt our diplomatic work at a sensitive and important time,”
Bush said. “This stubborn obstructionism ill serves our country.”
Bush
said the Senate had played “shallow politics” with Bolton’s nomination and appointment vote.
And
it didn’t help to have Republican Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island sitting on the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee
against Bolton from the get-go; telling Bush and the Senate he would deny Republicans the Bolton confirmation.
The U.N. has complained that Bolton
sabotaged their “organization's reform initiative by stirring differences between poor and rich countries.” South
Africa's ambassador Dumisani Shadrack Kumalo told the Post Bolton
made it too difficult “to build bridges because he is a very honest and blunt person.”
If that makes sense to anyone reading
this, please e-mail me and you’ll be my Idiot of the Week next week.
Kofi Annan didn’t have much
to say at all except noting Bolton did “as good a job as expected;” further claiming one
must concede to get others to concede. Is that how the rapists do it in the Congo—forced
concession?
Now the Senate is looking at nominating
the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad. Why so quick?
Why Khalilizad and not Bolton?
Again; the U.N.
has not done one, single good deed for the world in all its 61 years of kingly-like existence. The nations it overseas have
become poorer, sicker and deadlier with violent warlords taking over while the U.N. takes in exorbitant amounts of money that
disappear along with corporation affiliations off the roster.
And no one ever
faces trial and prison.
The
world needed John Bolton at the U.N. He was a danger to corruption. That’s why Democrats in the Senate forced his resignation.
Copywrite December
6, 2006
