COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TAKES AMERICA HOSTAGE:

ACADEMIC GROUNDS FOR TREASON

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 25, 2007

Once, very long ago in America, treason was something to be abhorred. Today it is admired and aspired to. Treason is akin to women at shoe sales: grab as much as you can and don’t look back. Then flaunt your actions while your husband weeps over the credit card bill.

Let me now state with utmost categorical belligerence: I hate Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. Not only is he a terrorist ruling a terror-run nation funneling money and weapons to terrorists killing U.S. troops, he is the man responsible for invading the American Embassy in Iran in 1979, taking United States citizens and holding them hostage for 444 days.

He is also the man who helped over throw the Shah of Iran, a friend to America whom Jimmy Carter back-stabbed, letting Ahnadinedjad revolt against freedom, capture U.S. citizens, and put the Ayatollah Khomeini in power placing Iran under theological Islamic freakish rule.

I have never forgiven Ahmadinedjad and his crony revolutionaries for what they did to America’s people. I never will. He deserves nothing but the same treatment he inflicts upon Jews, Christians and U.S. troops fighting for world freedom from Islamic nuts. He deserves what his people chant in the streets—death.

Further insult has been added to a 28 year-old injury: Columbia University’s President Bollinger had the utter gall and treasonous indecency to invite the murderous terror-monger as an honored guest speaker on campus. This is the same campus which refused to let the founder of the anti illegal immigration group Minutemen Project James Gilchrist speak, forcing him off stage, because Gilchrist is against illegal aliens in America.

Columbia University is against Gilchrist’s beliefs, they are however not against Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad’s murderous principles of killing off every non-Muslim on the planet he’s trying to blow up.

Mr. Bollinger, why don’t you just hand the bastard the keys to the city?  Better yet, why not give him what he truly wants—our entire American heads on the death platter.

How dare you Columbia U; how dare you Mr. Bollinger; How dare you do that to our brave citizens who endured well over a year under that brute’s fowl imprisonment; how dare you invite a monster who threatens America with nuclear warfare on to your campus. How dare you Mr. Bollinger invite the man whose people chant “death To America” in the streets, while Ahmadinedjad smiles in agreement, into the halls of American academia with a ceremony of honor fit for the President of the United States you probably hate because Bush loves Jews and freedom.

Columbia University is not exercising free speech. Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad has no rights to free speech in the U.S.; he has no right to be heard. Columbia is promoting treason while kissing up to a man known to be responsible for helping Iraq insurgents killing U.S. troops. Columbia University is a disgrace and every student and professor supporting this evil man’s visit are shameful, reprehensible, seditious agitators to terror.

In a city predominantly Jewish, Columbia invited a man who openly and proudly denies the Holocaust. That tells me those professors and students honored to have a terrorists as their guest on campus don’t believe 10 million Jews were massacred less than 100 years ago by a human killing machine. Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad is a human killing machine on his way to becoming the next Adolf Hitler and Columbia University is encouraging the maniacal dictator’s endeavors to annihilate mankind because he loves the murder.

Every Jewish Alumnus should permanently withhold money to Columbia University.

Let’s be honest here; we all know why this turban-toting terror monger came to New York to speak at the liberal Columbia University: to spew out liberal rhetoric puked daily by Air America, Daily Kos, liberal loons on the House and Senate floor, and Hollywood foreign policy strategist extraordinaire’s. The man is loved by liberals; therefore Ahmadinedjad promotes their crazy instability through the expulsion of his own insanity. The invitation simply justifies the madman’s actions.

The fiend spoke directly to the Middle East. Make no mistake about that. His audiences, his disciples, are terrorists in the Middle East rallying round their TV’s and radios to hear their great Messiah of maniacal muck-racking “Down With America” spewing lies. Liberals consider the murdering Hitler-in-the-making a poor misunderstood Muslim in need of tolerance for peace with Iran. Therefore we must let the homely bastard speak freely in American schools with hopes of indoctrinating students to fascism.

Let’s take a look at what dish-rag wearing nuke-hurler had to say to the oh so hateful America: first, Bollinger criticized Ahamdinedjad for ten minutes in the opening address, basically calling the terror leader a murderer, something Ahmadinedjad took as a grievous offense. Bollinger did not need to hold a thugathon to make those accusations; he should have simply held an International Relations conference for the school, speaking out against Iran without inviting a terrorist to answer Bollinger’s questions.

Gee, too bad Yale didn’t think to invite Adolf Hitler to speak in 1942.

Ahamdinedjad’s speech and answers to questions were so pathetic, he made Paris Hilton’s consistent use of “like” a good reason to hand illiterates PhD’s in English Rhetoric.

The entire diatribe was a rant about science and the apparent fact the Holocaust has never been researched since WWII. “Humans would always have remained stranded in ignorance…the nature of man is granted by the Almighty to all.” To all; even Jews, Christians, women and gays? And thus began the psycho pseudo-Evangelical rant by a man who wouldn’t know God if he tripped head first over the Almighty’s feet.

I’ve attended many academic speeches by diplomats, British MP’s, U.S. leaders, and everyone has spoken intelligently, even those I’ve disagreed with. But this lunatic made no sense because he had no intentions of speaking sensibly. His entire reason for the visit was to infect liberal Jane Fonda-ettes minds with more lies for his own propagandist purpose—to kill us all if he can.

On went the science speech and how “real science rescues humans from ignorance.” Real liberal science would have helped us all when your mother was pregnant with you, you s.o.b.

“Realities of the world,” the loon stated, “are not limited to the material…selfishness does not allow some to accept reality…material desires place humans against realities.” That right there was a direct slam toward U.S. capitalism. Ahmadinedjad was condemning the U.S. for wealth which feeds, cloths, and doctors the world, including his people who flee from his brutalities. I notice the terrorist had no problem taking Iran’s material possessions in 1979 when forcing Iranians to become slaves to the Ayatollah Khomeini.

He further spewed that “bullying powers [meaning the U.S.] create non-existent threats,” further alleging the U.S. made WMD’s and misuses science for our “big powers.”

Oh how I wish we would.

“Some big powers,” he claimed, “stop other nation’s development” of nukes. He wants to know why some nations are trying to stop Iran from having nukes. Gee, I wonder why? Could it be because you’re Hitler in the making and you want to blow up the world?  

I swear I was watching Jane Fonda in a beard. The only thing missing was a tank for photo opts.

Then insane-Jane-in-a-beard declared: “the biggest God-given gift is scientific knowledge.” No Mr. Terror that is not the biggest gift from God. Salvation through Jesus Christ is the greatest God-given gift. Something you’ll never get since you kill off his people.

The next bombastic lie was a blathering harangue promoting Palestinians as humbly lovely people and Jews as nasty Arab-killers. Apparently, if the Holocaust actually had happened, “why don’t we have sufficient evidence? Why aren’t we researching the 1930’s and 40’s from a different perspective” than that of Jews? “We research chemistry, but not a historical event that was catastrophic. If it’s reality, why are Palestinians paying for the Holocaust? They did not commit any crimes in WWII.” And on he went telling Columbia how horrible Palestinians suffer because of the Holocaust. I thought the Holocaust never happened?

Stupid me, and I thought Jews were put into gas chambers by Nazis. So it was Palestinians? What an ass. Palestinians have been attacking Jews for decades. Jews are fighting back against a group of people who declared they want to drive Israeli’s into the sea.

The problem is the poor, homely, little terrorist has no access to books, TV, magazines, etc., or he would know the Holocaust is researched daily with more and more proof showing it happened. Not to mention Hitler filmed and photographed every atrocity he committed with great pride. But terrorists must defend each other from those nasty Jews.  

The anti-Christ declared Iran wants to be independent, “so don’t interfere with us.”

Is that a threat I hear?

Of course he flipped like a Kerry professing “Iran loves all nations; Iran is a peaceful, loving nation.”

Yes, we Americans know. You showed us great love in 1979 when you loved our people for 444 days. I say we reciprocate Ahmadinedjad’s love. Let’s kidnap him and love him like a Bundy.

Again, the freak told Columbia “no one should interfere with Palestinian affairs…allow Palestinians to decide for themselves.” That comment got a rousing applause from the liberal snots. It’s amazing what $150,000 gets one’s children—stupidity, stupidity, and more stupidity. And lots of beer, of course.

When asked why he provided aid to terrorists, Ahmadinedjad answered by asking if someone comes and blows you up, how would you treat them? “Iran is a victim of terrorism.” the murderer complained. “We don’t need to resort to terror, but we’re victims of terror.” Then stated “Iran loves all people and loves all the Jews in Iran,” claiming Jews live freely and unmolested in Iran. Yeah right.

Those loved Jews thank you for killing them.

My favorite answer was Ahmadinedjad’s answer to his mistreatment of women and homosexuals. For ten minutes he went on and on about how well-treated Iranian women are, ignoring the question about gays. He simply insisted women are equal to men in Iran. When asked again about his mistreatment of homosexuals, the homo-hater declared: “In Iran we have no homosexuals. We do not have that type of phenomena in Iran. I don’t know where you got that idea” that homosexuals exist in Iran.

Sorry Rosie, you have no home in Iran. You don’t exist; you are however a phenomena.

That one comment was the one to anger the little liberal snots of academia: the fact homosexuality was called a non-existent phenomena. Not the fact the man commits crimes against humanity.

Bollinger defended his invite of the ruler of the largest terror-run state today by declaring even though he finds Ahmadinedjad “offensive and odious,” having the dictator speak at Columbia University depicts “America at its best”  further admitting he would have invited Adolf Hitler to speak.

Bollinger really needed his students to listen to the long-winded fulminate of an insane, brutal, anti-Semitic dictator hell-bent on world annihilation? No sir, you did not need to turn traitor to engage in talk about Iran. You could have spoken on your own. Better yet Mr. Bollinger, you should have invited Holocaust survivors to speak to your students. Then the truth would have been told.

Bollinger is the worst example of academic failure in America. I’m still waiting for liberal dem politicians to denounce Columbia for treasonous behavior. So far Hillary keeps dodging questions about the speech. Wow, Suha and Yasser Arafat’s girlfriend not denouncing an Arab terrorist; I’m shocked. As for Ahmadinedjad wanting peace: how bout’ we drop an A-Bomb on him and his nuke plants. I know Israel would gladly help. Life would sure be peaceful without that ugly toad.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

THE RUSSIANS ARE THREATENING TO COME

BY LISA RICHARDS

June 5, 2007

Is it any surprise to those with fully in tact brains that Russian President Vladimir Putin is threatening the United States with warfare? According to the June 4, 2007 Associated Press reports, Putin is threatening to bestow a nuke upon the U.S. if President Bush does not halt his plans to install the European Missile Defense system in Eastern European countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic.

Putin threatened the U.S. he “will take retaliatory steps against the U.S.” if President Bush does not abort his plans to help Europe protect itself against enemy nuclear attacks.

The missile defense system targets all enemy countries including Russia and Iran.

Golly, gee wiz Europe; why would you desire to protect yourselves from Russia? After all, was Stalin not completely obliging to Eastern Europe after Hitler blew his anti-Semitic brains out? This is the gratitude Europeans show Russia, who’s Soviet Union wonderfully decorated Europe down the middle with electric frying fences.

The main enemy Europe is trying to deflect the nukes of is Iran and their psycho president Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. So why does that threaten and bother Putin; because Iran and its president are Putin’s friends whom he supplies nuclear capability to.

According to Putin, the nice little KGB agent and friend to Iran and whose soul President Bush claimed “to see in to:” “if a part of the strategic nuclear potential of the United States appears in Europe…we [Russia] will have to take appropriate steps in response…we will have new targets in Europe, ballistic or cruise missiles or maybe a completely new system”

Like perhaps, the KGB restored to keep Europeans in line through death or disappearance as you did during your good ole Soviet days. Or perhaps new military technology; I hear you Russians are brilliant at building submarines.

In his autobiography “First Person,” Putin states he wants the Russian Presidency to be a direct rule of government, Further stating the office should be served “For a year or two,” [and] “all the government agencies must be restored.”

Putin’s been in office seven years while reinstalling all Russian Presidential power back into the Kremlin; and trying to restore, while defending through mysterious deaths, the KGB now known as the FSB.

If you’re confused, remember the good ole Breshnev days prior to Gorbachev who gave Russia freedom and openess through the Glasnost policy Russians rejected when they overthrew the freedom-loving Gorbachev for Boris Yeltsin, who made a habbit of publicly molesting every woman at every summit while cameras rolled. At least Yeltsin agreed with Gorbachev even though he formed the coup against the Secretary General so he could be president. Yeltsin was however, the worst Russian economist since Khrushchev and Brezhnev, both of whom collapsed the Soviet Union economy; therefore, Yeltsin had to step down and the KGB’er Putin stepped up and took over.

And guess what Putin is brilliant at aside from spying and keeping people controled and under his thumb; economics.

Putin also claims in his autobiography he “is not a politician;” rather he “is a soldier.” This from the former head of the East German branch of the KGB who openly declares he “longs for the old glorious days of Mother Russia.”

Hitler wasn’t a politician either; he was a soldier. Stalin wasn’t a politician;  he was a soldier. Vladimir Lenin wasn’t a politician; he was a rebel soldier and Bolshevik. Saddam wasn’t a politician; he was a soldier. Kim Jung IL is not a politician; he’s a sodier. Yasser arafat wasn’t a politician; he was a terrorist and soldier. Colonal Muammar Khadaffi is not a politician; he’s a soldier; so is Hugo Chavez—guerilla soldier; Fidel Castro—guerilla communist soldier, Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad—Muslim terrorist soldier, Daniel Ortega, Manuel Noriega, Idi Amin. Need I say more?

I wonder if Hillary Clinton could be on the above list since she’s a PLO supporter and was a 1960’s Black Panther supporter?  Does Fema-Nazi count?

Dear President Bush, when you looked into Putin’s eyes and claimed you saw Putin’s soul, it was not his soul you saw; it was mephistopole in a black suit and turtle neck shirt.

Both Bush and Putin are set to meet at the annual 2008 G8 Summit in Germany; and Putin is all fired up to fire missiles at the United States of America for helping Europe build a radar defense system to intercept and defend itself from Iran.

Iran announced June 4, 2007, it is incapable of targeting Europe. Iran claims its missiles can only reach the range of 800 miles which allows them to attack Israel.

We all know you want to nuke Israel Mr. Ahmadinedjad; you’ve made that claim your daily mantra. But you have also claimed in the past you wish to blow up America. Now you say you can’t even touch Europe; yet according you top Iranian  security agent Ali Larijani: “we will take the appropriate steps in response[ to the U.S.] if the U.S. continues installing weapons defense systems in Europe.”

 Why; because you want to nuke Europe and you actually can reach the U.S.?

Larijani stated “[the U.S.] installing a missile system in Europe against Iran is a joke…” So, is it just sarcastic joking around when you and your people threaten to nuke Israel off the planet? Jews around the world are side-splitting with laughter.

Putin’s threat should come as no surprise since he harangued the U.S. on February 4, 2007 in Munich, Germany for what he describes as America’s “almost uncontained use of force in the world.”

That force is contained to Iraq and Afghanistan; one who bombed us; the other whose leader threstened America for over ten years while breaking 17 UN Resolutions. George W. Bush’s invasions of the two nations freed 50 million people from the Taliban and torture monger Saddam Hussein. Putin considers that “uncontained force.”

What Russia did over a period of nearly 1,000 years of conquering Europe and Asia was uncontained force. What Russia did in 1918 with the installation of communism and the declaration of the U.S.S.R. was uncontained force. What Stalin did to his people while in power was the uncontained use of violent force against humanity. Notice Putin has never denounced Stalin or the old Soviet-style rule.

Vladimir Putin is the man who told the world this past February “we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force in international relations…this is very dangerous, nobody feels secure anymore because nobody can hide behind international law.” That comment was directed to the United States and George w. Bush who needs to threaten back with retaliation if Putin so much as spits in the direction of America.

Mr. Putin, you used uncontained hyper force and hidden secret-style brute force when you were head of the KGB; you hid your secret killings and control of people’s lives quite well. You hid secrets so well in fact, if any former KGB agent speaks out to this day, he dies mysteriously of uncontained hyper spy novel-style effects.

Here’s the deal; Putin wants the old Soviet Union restored to Russia with open-door access for the people to come and go as they please. To close Russian doors would cause riots as seen in 1991 when the Eastern Block demanded the doors be thrown wide open. Keeping the doors to the west open while keeping an iron grip control on Russians is what Putin wants—Stalinism without collectivization and Gulags.

Just because collectivization and Gulags are extinct does not mean all is well. Putin controls the presses and media. If journalists speak out against the Kremlin, they are threatened and shut down if they refuse to comply with Putin’s demands.

It’s okay for Putin to threaten; it is however not okay for Europe to ask America to help protect Europe from enemy threats. That’s because Russia wants to be the world superpower. Think the Soviet Union and Stalin, Ivan, Peter, and Nicolas.

On June 4, 2007, Putin declared: “One of the main problems is that certain members of the international community think that their [American] opinion is the definitive truth. This, of course, does not help to create an atmosphere of trust.”

Neither did the you and your KGB.

copywrite June 5, 2007 

IF THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A BETTER PLAN FOR IRAQ;

WHY DON’T THEY SHARE HOW TO DO NOTHING?

BY LISA RICHARDS

January 11, 2007

Have you ever met a positive minded liberal? Have you ever met a liberal who could smile without a facelift pulling the lips upward by the scalp? Don’t try looking; it’s like trying to find King Arthur and takes just as long with increasing mythological legends.

Last night on January 10, 2007, President Bush did exactly what Democrats demanded of him; he delivered an address outlining a new strategic plan for the troops in Iraq.

Doing what Ted and Nancy insisted went over as well as William of Normandy killing Harold Godwinson at Hastings and conquering the Britons—pure disgust. Bush would have been bettor off shooting arrows at Nancy Pelosi by the way his plan was received.

According to liberals and democrats; we Americans are “war-weary Americans.” Over freakin’ what? I’m not over in Iraq fighting my ass off to protect me; so how can I be “war weary?” I’m liberal-weary and sick and tired of bunch of sissy-assed spoiled brats who spent their college days protesting Viet Nam and our brave soldiers whom the brats spit on when those brave men returned home. I’m weary over the nativity of negativity displayed daily on the House Floor.

I am not war weary. War does not tire me because I’m not a soldier losing weeks of sleep to protect me while I sit in my wing back watching Jack Bauer torture terrorists.

I get weary over winy-voiced shrews like Clair Shipman with her snidely infused comments on Good Morning America about how bad Bush’s plan is for America and the troops. Oh how I wish Jack Bauer existed in real life.

I weary-vomit from the incessant rants of Nancy Pelosi and her hair-ball voiced boy-toy Harry Reid who ordered Bush to give them a plan for an Iraq time-line; and when the president does it; the self-centered, pessimistic naysayers of doom tell us all they could run Iraq better than Maliki and Bush. Of course Harry and Nancy still refuse to tell us all how they could stop terrorism.

I have an idea; send Nancy to Iraq; it would turn into the Salt Flats of the Middle East.

It took Bush 20 minutes to announce a simple plan everyone should understand. It took 20 seconds for Democrats to rush the House halls to the corps denouncing Bush’s plan, they way he parts his hair, his suit, his tie that Harry wanted for Christmas, that flag lapel, the First Lady’s mantle decor behind the President, the books on the shelf—one was uneven—and the fact Bush didn’t flub his words like the redneck he is.

Bush stated the “situation is unacceptable to the American people—and it is unacceptable to me.” Bush also said “we need to change our strategy in Iraq… [and] we all [the Iraq study group and commissions] agreed that there is no magic formula for success in Iraq.” Liberals want Iraq to fail, not succeed and they want to hear Bush say he and his war is a big, fat failure they told him it would be.

Bush never declared that because the war is not a failure—Washington and the Democrats are.

Bush noted that leaving Iraq now would lead to a catastrophe in that region and disaster for the U.S. Think 9/11 revisited, Islamic Fascists completely taking over the Middle East—that will happen if U.S. troops leave Iraq—and Iran becoming a super power.

Syria and Iran are already funneling weapons to Iraq; imagine the chaos if America abandons Iraq now. We’re talking about people with GED’s in IED’s.

Bush plainly stated why the U.S. has had to remain in Iraq since the war ended;—and it did end. What’s going on now always happens after war—Iraq did not have a police force or real military to defend itself from the pro-Saddamites. The Iraqi people needed protection and America owed it to them.

Liberals and democrats can’t seem to get it through their empty heads one does not leave defenseless people to stand up alone against terrorists with big bombs, big guns and fat, crazed Mullahs.

Bush’s proposal outlines appointments for military commanders, deployed Iraqi armies and a National Police force to the nation. However, Bush noted it will “require increasing American force levels.” 20,000 more U.S. troops which Democrats demanded Rumsfeld deploy over a year ago and now are against since Nancy was crowned queen and Harry became her lap dog.

How many reading this article truly believes Democrats want Iraq to be a success? Democrats never wanted success in Viet Nam; that’s why they protested the war and allowed Jane Fonda to commit treason and break the law of the “Logan Act.”

Last night, Bush told America and world Iraq’s success depends upon its people helping their new military by taking a stand against terrorists. That won’t happen over night; maybe not years, but it is the only remedy for success in that region.

Again; Democrats don’t want success in the Middle East—especially Iraq, they want Iraqi’s and Middle Easterners to remain in the seventh century, uneducated and clueless so Democrats can say; see, the UN should be in charge of the world and America and we should send billions in aid to Iraq’s leaders keeping the people poor so we look like champions of the poor.

Plus Madonna needs another shopping spree.

So liberals, Bush is not happy with the insurgency either. He wants to move on it and fix it; but that’s not good enough. Now if Bush would appoint the fired-by-Clinton Wesley Clarke as General in charge of the war so he could go on another rampage; then all would be Oz.

Again I ask; if Democrats have the solution to stopping the insurgents and ridding the world of terrorism; inform us. Tell us all right now; we’re listening. We would be glad to know how you omnipotent do-gooders of crappola can do something better than God.

War is hell. War sucks and good people die because bad people have to be fought with violence. The only true solution to peace is war; and if you don’t like that analogy too bad, because it’s the truth. Even God has to end evil someday through the war to end all wars.

Wars are not won by picking daisies and singing Joan Baez songs. Wars are won by killing the enemy and wiping the bad guys off the planet.

9/11 happened because America was too politically correct thanks to Bill Clinton and Al Gore who felt Osama bin Laden was not a threat to the world. These are the same two goons who promised to finish what Bush 41 didn’t—take out Saddam. They never did either and 3,000 human beings died within the space of two hours.

That horrific day should make every American weary enough to realize terrorists must die—any way by any means. And Americans need to understand terrorists must be fought on their own soil—not ours where they could wipe out one million in one hour with a nuke.

Americans also need to comprehend the logistics of training seventh-century-minded humans how to build a nation, an army and a police force. Iraq is a nation which never saw Democracy until 2006. That my friends are 1,400 years of totalitarian rule by terrorism and thousands of generations knowing only torture as their way of life. Iraq has lived in fear so long, the people can’t comprehend freedom; and Democrats and many Americans believe America has no right trying to change the minds and hearts of people who know only one horrific way of life.

That’s bull. It is every bit America’s right and duty to go over to any nation living in a dung heap under brutal rule and tell the people they don’t have to live that way because they’re God created human beings—not animals who, by the way, are treated better than people in third world dung heaps.

Bush’s speech was on, right on and that’s what annoys the manure out of Democrats. Democrats hate a man’s man, a cowboy like George W. Bush—Democrats and liberals are girly men, which is why Dems like limp-wristed, spandex-pantied trophy-man Kerry.

Bush is also patient and that drives liberals insane. The daisy-picking, peace-niks hate imperturbable perseverance unless it’s waiting on Clinton while he gets serviced. Then we must be long-suffering and tolerant.

Bush outlined a new plan that must be tried and tested. There will be no failure in the new plan as there was none in the old plan. The only malfunction will be in Washington where Viet Nam was lost by cynical, pessimistic liberals who started that war and refused to leave because it made them heroes to future indoctrinated school children.

If the entire faction of world terrorism was exterminated tomorrow and Iraq suddenly became peaceful and 21^st centuryesque, Iran and Syria became democratic and free; Bush would be the most hated man in America and the world because whatever Bush does, Democrats and liberals will always disagree.

Copywrite January 11, 2007

SADDAM IS DEAD AND IT’S AMERICA’S FAULT

BY LISA RICHARDS

January 4, 2007

By now you’ve seen the cell phone footage of Saddam Hussein walking up the gallows for his post-Christmas hanging. The man who tortured countless human beings died by execution Iraqi-style—he was hanged as opposed to American fashion which is 20 years living happily on death row with three square meals a day and daily exercise and cigarette swapping with the boys.

Heckling guards who filmed the entire execution on video phone told the Butcher of Baghdad Al Sader was now the big boss. The infuriated Saddam shouted the “F” word and told the guards to go to hell as the noose was placed around Saddam’s neck.

As soon as the scaffold opened and Saddam fell through to hang, the world and liberals blamed America for his death. Apparently it’s unfair to kill mass murderers; they have the right to kill and not be judged by the Great Satan—America.

That’s right, America killed Saddam and the news media is angry at George W. Bush for capturing the killer and allowing Iraq to try and execute the poor terrorist.

If attacks begin upon the West it will be on George Bush’s head. That’s because Islam has yet to converge on Europe and America, attacking and killing Westerners.

As if Muslims need an excuse to attack Jews and Christians.

Arabs have been attacking Jews for 5000 years and Christians for 1,400 years; so where’s the justification for new attacks other than the Koran tells the turbanites to do so?

My favorites are the liberal defense attorney’s claiming there’s no actual proof Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of Kurds in the late 1980’s gassing, or that Saddam and his sons actually committed the rape and torture crimes eye witnesses claim. One liberalista purported the photos of the gassed Kurds could have been doctored, and if they weren’t, it still was not proof enough to execute Saddam. That same defense attorney who appeared on Hannity and Colmes the night of Saddam’s execution asserted the execution would only be humiliation to Saddam.

Well yeah.

The ticker tape parade honoring Saddam for the masses of dead was sort of out of the question; sending him to hell however was not.

I’m not going to fill you with all the details of Saddam Hussein’s rule since I’ve written on it so much it need not be rewritten. For anyone who doesn’t know the man killed close to 2 million human beings while torturing, raping and controlling Iraq through 30 years of fear; look under The War on Terror page on my web site or go to JSTOR.com for all the research journals on the bastard’s life.

Saddam Hussein was this generation’s Adolph Hitler. He hated Jews and killed as many as possible along with his own people as Hitler did. Saddam believed in Social Darwinism and rejected the belief in God as Hitler did, he was paranoid like Hitler, he was a Fascist like Hitler, and he was completely obsessed with Joseph Stalin—Hitler’s friend—to the point of making himself look and dress like Stalin. And all three freaks had mustaches.

Hitler hid an underground bunker from the U.S. and Stalin—whom he came to fear—and killed himself out of cowardice. Saddam hid from the U.S. whom he feared, in a hole in the ground; but unlike Hitler, Saddam didn’t have the guts to blow his brains out; he leapt out of the hole begging the U.S. for mercy.

American troops actually showed the evil brute mercy by not killing him on the spot when they captured him. The Iraqi’s showed Saddam no mercy by putting a noose around his neck and swinging him like a wind chime.

And it’s all America’s fault.

If a cure for AID’s was discovered tomorrow; it would be America’s fault people would not die from HIV. If hunger in South East Asian and African countries was suddenly stopped; America would be blamed for the fact dictators could no longer collect billions in funds from the UN.

Whenever something good happens for the world and its people; America is a big fat bastard sticking its nose in everyone’s business. Yet if America doesn’t get involved quickly enough while assessing Tsunami damage, earthquake damage, bomb damage, etc; America is a big, rotten, greedy, stingy bastard.

When America frees a nation from the grip of evil; America is nothing but a busy-body trying to colonize the world.

Actually I wish America would colonize Iraq; it wouldn’t look like a toilet and the people would have a better chance at Democracy.

Oh racist shmacist, can’t you find a better come back? Colonizing never hurt the world; but that’s for another article in which many will scream racism to my words.

The point here is America freed Iraq, gave Iraq the beginnings to a Constitutional Republic if they so choose; and they did by writing their own constitution. It may not be as perfect as the U.S. Constitution, nor is Iraq a Constitutional Republic; but look what Iraq is and how far it’s come in three and a half years. It took America more than ten years after the writing and ratification of the constitution to stop fighting one another, embracing America’s new found freedom.

The world should shout for joy that Saddam is dead and can’t harm another living soul. Instead, the world is angry the maniacal despot was humiliated by hanging by the neck.

Nothing good will ever make liberals or Europeans happy. They are the nativity of negativity.

Well who cares. I’m glad Saddam is dead. Good riddance in hell where he belongs. And if there are 72 virgins waiting; trust me when I tell you they look like Rosie O’Donnell.

Copywrite January 4, 2007

DEMOCRATS WIN, RUMSFELD RESIGNS:

TERRORISTS ARE DANCING IN THE STREETS

BY LISA RICHARDS

November 8, 2006

I’m not surprised Democrats won the majority of the House and Senate since liberal Americans are products of botched abortions. Actually, so are the 40% of Republicans who refused to vote out of anger toward overspending and lack of border control.

Now Nancy Pelosi is queen and waiting to be throned—(she needs the House to vote her in over other Congressmen before she can be crowned)—but she’s whipped out the Patchouli, thrown that razor away, ripped off her bra for a burning as never seen before; unless you count Hillary Clinton’s days at Wellesley, and she’s ready to croon her Helen Reddy-est to I am woman!

All Democrats need to complete their glee-athon is a Tony Schwartz political ad showing little Darfur girls picking daisies to the sounds of John Kerry counting down to a nuke explosion.

On November 7^th, the country decided it was tired of a Constitutional Republic and voted in favor of Socialism by saying yes to San Francisco liberista Nancy Pelosi and her group of tax-hiking, gay marriage promoting, abortion soliciting, God-hating, Pledge of Allegiance banning, flag burning, anti-war wigging whingers of leftist lunacy and no to America’s traditional founding ideals.

If any of you really think the government will be better off with people who believe Mexicans have every right to invade America, Spanish should overtake English, taxes need to be raised—(especially on wealthy bastards who have the nerve to employ people)—so welfare leeches can steal more from hard-working Americans; the Patriot Act should be banned so Islamic terrorists have the privacy needed to build nukes to kill Americans; Iraq was never in need of freedom so we should pull out, leave it to Iran and Syria because Darfur is more important; open the borders so illegals can take over the South West; don’t cry when Islamic wackos detonate another 9/11.

This is what we have to look forward to over the next two years; Democrats will do everything to undermine the president; albeit they will put on their Halloween masks—(Nancy’s is natural)—pretending to be bi-partisan human beings hankering to work with the president whom they hate more than fur.

Democrats intend to do away with the Patriot Act which will put all lives in danger—(except faithful terrorists Democrats love to protect)—they will fight to free Gitmo detainees by closing Guantanimo Bay because it’s wrong to imprison terrorizing freedom fighters trying to kill us all for 70 virgins. The borders will become diplomatic welcoming gates to America with bus depots covering 700 miles delivering criminals into America whom Democrats will help take over the South West now that they finally rid themselves of that patriot prick J.D. Hayworth.