THE WORLD AS IT SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT BE ACCORDING TO LISA RICHARDS

CONGRESS: LEGISLATIVE LUNACY
Home
TRIBUTE PAGE
THE RACE FOR 2008
CONSERVATIVE VERSUS LIBERAL NEWS
IDIOT OF THE WEEK
THE WAR ON TERROR
SENATE IDIOTS
CONGRESS: LEGISLATIVE LUNACY
THE CLINTON CHRONICLES
THE KENNEDY PAGE
THE HOWARD DEAN PAGE
FENCE-JUMPERS, GATE-CRASHERS, AND THIEVES
WHAT'S WRONG IN AMERICA
AMERICAN MORALITY LOST
FRUITS AND NUTS
HILARITY IN A WORLD OF DISPARITY
LIBERALISM IS COMMUNISM
AMERICAN TRAITORS
THE SUPREME COURT
THE DANGERS OF MULTI-CULTURALISM AND ISLAM

YOUR TAXES PAY FOR THIS...

THE DEFINITION OF TORTURE:

TELLING TERRORISTS TO STOP BEING MEAN

 

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 16, 2007

 

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” Winston Churchill

 

My favorite moment in the movie Tombstone is when Kurt Russell’s character Wyatt Earp stands in the middle of the street, rifle waving in the air, shouting to the violent gang known as the Cowboys: “You called down the thunder, well now you’ve got it…you tell them hell’s coming and I’m coming with it!”

 

 

And Russell’s character Earp goes on a vengeful hunt, killing the Cowboys for the death of his brother and their terrorizing of Tombstone.

 

 

No matter how many times I watch the movie, that one scene with Russell standing in the street shouting those words makes me throw my fist in the air and whoop a big YES!

 

 

George W. Bush standing on the World Trade Center rubble pile after 9/11 was Wyatt Earp letting terrorist know he was coming and hell was coming with him. But liberals like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton don’t like Bush’s Wyatt ways. Bush believes in going after the terrorists and interrogating enemies is a must. To Nancy Pelosi who believes we should not harm the murderers of mankind, interrogation is unconscionable; to Hillary Clinton, it’s called “cow-boy diplomacy.”

 

 

On October 5, 2007, President Bush accomplished the impossible; he made comments to the press that actually caused Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to raise her frozen-in-place forehead: “when we find somebody who may have information regarding a potential attack on America, you bet we’re going to detain them, and you bet we’re going to question them, because the American people expect us to find out information…so we can help protect them. That’s our job.”

 

 

Not according to Nancy who seems to be more concerned with the preserving the lives of Islamic murderers than actual human beings. You see, Nancy wants a definition of what Bush considers interrogation.

 

 

Well, locking the thugs of earth alone in a room with you Nancy would be considered torture in my book, and perfectly acceptable. They would all commit suicide. Better yet; why not arrest militant gays who invade Catholic Masses? Now that would be intolerantly torturous.

 

 

By the way, how could any form of torture be harmful to a race that desires suicide? Islam preaches and teaches death by suicide combined with murder to all non-Muslims. So why would torturing turbanites be so bad? After all, they do love to torture Jews and Christians. Maybe they would enjoy a little reciprocation.

 

 

Not in Nancy Pelosi’s book of Face Lifts and Fatwas.

 

 

On Sunday October 7, 2007, Fox News’s Chris Wallace interviewed the Speaker of the House on many issues, including Bush’s comments on interrogating the enemy. Bush’s interview two days earlier came as some sort of shock to the woman in charge of Congress.

 

 

Apparently, the “longest-serving member of Congress on the intelligence Committee” and ex Officio Leader does not get briefings on secret memos all other members of Congress receive. Pelosi claims she was never briefed in 2005 on any Department of Justice secret memos concerning interrogation. “All I know is what I’ve read in the New York Times.”

 

 

Dear fellow Americans, if you are wondering why the Democrat Congress and liberals in general are so screwed up, not doing one thing they claimed they would do since taking control of the House, it’s because the New York Times, not the President of the United States, has been hired to brief the Speaker of the House.

 

 

I wonder if that’s how Bill Clinton figured out he actually did have sex with that woman—reading it in the New York Times.

 

You know, Nancy Pelosi should ask the New York Times where Osama bin Laden is since the Times seems to be her only resource of intelligence and communication.

 

 

Oddly enough, on October 9, 2007, the House passed a bill for wiretapping the enemy, but Nancy is worried about interrogating those we find trying to kill us. It might not be kind treatment, and we wouldn’t want to be mean to the bad guys.

 

 

Pelosi told Wallace she “appreciates the value of intelligence to protect American people,” and admits she wants the best our CIA and military can get, but Nancy wants the president to understand America must follow “international standards” concerning interrogation. The U.S. must follow the law if the U.S. wants to appear good in the eyes of the world.

 

 

Having an excellent reputation is more important than the U.S. making the bad guys tell the CIA where and when the next attack is going to happen.

 

 

God forbid we insult the Russians.

 

 

So what exactly would Nancy consider torture? Well, according to what she told Wallace, torture would be “a combination of head-slapping, water-boarding, and exposure to extreme temperatures.” “There is a legal definition of torture,” Pelosi told Wallace, “that I believe this would fit,” further stating that the president has been reported in the press as saying the above are not torture, and “I just can’t give you an informative answer on that.”

 

 

Once again Nancy Pelosi claims to get her information from the press. Isn’t that what we the people do? Pelosi is the Speaker of the House of Congress and gets her information the way the people do? God help us; this woman is in charge.

 

 

To all you voters in California who reelected that woman to Congress, you deserve to be hit so hard in the heads you’re mother’s will feel the pain in their wombs.

 

 

Slapping terrorists in the head is not torture. Water-boarding is not torture. The person doesn’t drown; they only think they will. And exposure to extreme temperatures; oh please. I’m from New England. We have 100 degree humid summers instantly followed by chilly autumns, rapidly followed by freezing, damp, cold winters into rainy damp springs. If we new Englanders can handle those extremes, so can the mucks of martyrdom.

 

 

I’m so sick and tired of democrat leaders and their liberal ideals of treating all people equal. Terrorists are not equal to human beings. They don’t deserve fair treatment. Terrorist deserve the same as they give—death. If democrats get elected into the White House next year, Gitmo Bay will shut down and every terrorist in there will be set free to wreak havoc upon mankind. If Hillary or the anti-military Obama win the election, Nobel Peace Prizes will be handed out to every Muslim who succeeds in blowing up as many Jews and Christians as possible. If any of the democrat candidates win the election, say goodbye to wire-tapping the enemy and hello to another 9/11. If people allow a democrat to reenter the White House, expect Islam to infiltrate America further with greater freedom granted by liberals who love the enemy, want a socialized union with Mexico and Canada, and a Supreme Court answering to The Hague.

 

 

In my last piece I slammed Bush’s catering to Muslims and Ramadan when he should have denounced Islam and invited ex-Muslims to speak out on the evils this enemy is plotting against the world. I will always disagree with that bad move on Bush’s part. Yet despite my being against any Christian or Jew recognizing Muslims as equals and celebrating their holiday of fast and blast, I have to give Bush credit for keeping America safe from another attack. I may disagree with him on immigration and cow-towing to Islam, but he’s tough on terror and we’re safe because he let’s the CIA and military do their job—interrogate the enemy and get information to prevent another blood-bath.

 

 

I can’t discount the president on an excellent job fighting the War on Terror. I can discount Nancy Pelosi, because Pelosi is trying her best to block any and all means of extracting information which may prevent Americans from dying at the hands of mankind’s enemy. Pelosi knows better; she is a leader and her job is to protect the people of California and the halls of Congress, which must protect and create laws to protect the American people, not the enemy.

 

 

Nancy Pelosi and her fellow democrats—with the exception of the patriotic Joe Lieberman—are trying to reverse U.S. laws and override the Supreme Court to provide amnesty to massacring brutes. On top of that, the face-lifted diva of demoflop is trying to pass a genocide bill. Oh yes; that will definitely prevent another Hitler/Stalin/Saddam/Milosevic/Ahmadinedjad from ever murdering mankind. If Nancy says: no more genocide you naughty boys, evil will obey the Congressional Frisco queen.

 

 

Americans need to wise up and realize interrogation of the enemy is essential if we are to survive. Americans must do everything possible to fight Pelosi and legislators who want to protect the nihilistic Barbary’s resurrected and returned. Any Congressman or Senator who would vote down interrogation bills must be voted out of office. That includes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who gets all her vital, secret information via the New York Times.

 

 

On the up side, San Francisco’s militant gays can desecrate as many Catholic Masses as possible without arrest and interrogation.

 

 

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

GRANDMA GOT RUN OVER BY A LIBERAL:

WITH A FACE LIFT

 

BY LISA RICHARDS

January 9, 2007

 

She’s the self proclaimed “nice Italian grandma” who grew up in a “deeply patriotic [family] very proud of our Italian-American heritage—(as opposed to her American heritage which she and her parents were born into)—and [we’re] staunchly Democratic.” And now that staunch Democrat is the Speaker of the House “for the children” according to Nancy Pelosi. Whatever the hell that means.

 

Nancy Pelosi’s speech of inaugural nausea was all for “the children” as started by Madame Speaker. This is America; the only thing American kids give a crap about is the latest IPOD they can demand out of their parent’s wallets. And children in need remain in need so Democrats can keep their party. Without creating “needy” people Democrats would cease to exist.

 

But don’t fret, Nancy’s gonna’ screw your grandma’s over the healthcare and tax coals as soon as she can sign minimum wage hikes into law which will automatically hike taxes to fund minimum wage for unskilled workers. Pelosi also told America she and her people—that would be the race called liberals—intend on raising taxes on the rich to supplement the so-called poor.

 

Speaker Pelosi is smacking that gavel over the heads of every elderly and American business owner in America because she’s the law-maker of the land who “accepted [that] gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship.” And the evil rich are going to pay for their evil successes that built this evil nation founded on the sinfulness of freedom.

 

Nancy requests all [liberal Democrats] “to join together in the first 100 hours to make Congress the most honest and open Congress in history—100 hours.”

 

Except for the first 100 hours of the 110th Congress which Republicans are barred from the Queen’s throne room due to the fact they disagree with screwing Americans out of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

 

The most open and honest Congress in history? Yeah, and I’m a liberal pro-papist, French-loving Communist.

 

But remember folks, Nancy’s doing it all “for the children.” So is Michael Jackson. Both have bad face lifts.

 

Only Nancy is the first to do everything. The first Italian-American Speaker of the House; the American can’t call herself what she really is; an American. Nancy Pelosi is the first woman Speaker, the first Californian to be Speaker, the first woman to drive a car, the first woman to have children and grandchildren, the first woman to drink coffee and eat without gaining a pound of fat, and the first woman to look like she ties a bungee cord to her scalp and jumps. Sorry Joan Rivers and Cher. I think you get it.

 

On January 4, 2007, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco became America’s worst nightmare since the Clintons turned the White House into Motel 6. The hard core leftist liberal who makes Hillary look like a nice Grandma became third in line for the presidency and the first woman to hold the office of Speaker. And the Dems are sensationalizing this fete like it’s the first female accomplishment in history.

 

I’ll bet every reader that Hillary Clinton will cash in on the mama mania and start declaring herself a “mother.” I’m sure Bill has called her a “mother” many times.

 

According to Nancy, her new status is an “historical moment for the Congress and an historical moment for the women in this country.” As opposed to Condoleezza Rice being first Black Secretary of the State “It is a moment for which we waited over 200 years.”

 

200 years? Has the women never heard of Susan B. Anthony and Suffrage? Has Pelosi never heard women won rights to vote through suffrage? The Congresswomen forgot women have been in Congress for decades?

 

Nancy told America that women never lost faith they would achieve high standards. I guess she’s never heard of Ella Grasso—first female governor, or Abigail Adams who wrote her husband’s speeches and was the first American feminist fighting for voting rights, rights to one’s money and equality over 200 years ago.

 

According to Madame Speaker, we women have been working hard while waiting and “never loosing faith” we would redeem America.

 

Redeem it from what; sexual promiscuity, homosexual marriage pushed by divorce lawyers for money, underage abortions without parental consent, out of wedlock births, living together without marriage, sexual and violent TV and movies, freedom and rights for sex offenders and violent criminals, and corrupt politicians who steel, murder and molest?

 

No, America is redeemed to the power of women who never had power until Nancy Pelosi was crowned Queen of America.

 

Amelia Earhart, Abigail Adams, Condoleezza Rice, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, Prudence Crandall, Susan B. Anthony, female Black Hawke pilots, Women of the Air Corps. You ding bats have nothing on Nancy Pelosi. She is the only women in history to accomplish everything and anything next to Hillary Clinton who was the first female president married to the first black president from 1992-2000.

 

Nancy Pelosi proudly told the House Floor she accomplished her title “for our daughters and granddaughters, today we have broken the marble ceiling, for our daughters and granddaughters, the sky is the limit, anything is possible.”

 

Too bad Condi Rice’s parents didn’t break any marble and tell their stupid black daughter she could have become a champion figure skater, professional ballerina, concert pianist, doctorate Professor of Political Science, Provost of Stanford University, Accomplished Russian linguistic, Advisor to a president and the Secretary of the State Department.

 

Too bad Ella Grasso’s parents told her she was too stupid to become America’s first female governor. Too bad Martha Stewart couldn’t get a job to save her life and start a mega billion dollar industry because she’s only a woman.  

 

Pelosi invoked the founders in her acceptance speech by noting they “envisioned a new America driven by optimism, opportunity, and strength.” The only problem is, Nancy Pelosi is against those convictions. Any opportunity belongs solely to the government she wants controlling American lives by forceful strength.

 

Pelosi noted how our founders created a country that would be a “just and good place, as a fair and efficient society, as a source of opportunity for all.”

 

This woman is a liberal who only desires the opportunity to take away a fair and efficient society, replacing it with Social Darwinism slowly capturing America by way of liberalism. Opportunity and justice are set aside strictly for criminals so loved by liberals.

 

Pelosi claimed “Our new America [that would be Europe] will provide [nothing for Americans] unlimited opportunity [for liberal politicians] for future generations [of Communists under my rule,] not burden them [the liberal politicians] with mountains of debt [I intend to place wealthy Americans.]”

 

Again, Pelosi has told the press she wants taxes raised on the rich. That means job losses for those employed by the rich who can not employ if they have mountains of taxes to pay to Pelosi’s government.

 

You may now promptly hit the floor face first. I’m on Martini’s, purple pills, pink pills and every chalky drink in the antacid isle I can get my paws on.

 

Some people I’ve spoken to feel it’s no big deal Nancy Pelosi is in charge of the 110th Congress. In fact, those imbeciles in need of Lithium/Thorzine/Valium Martini’s feel it’s historical to have Nancy holding the gavel. Those same imbeciles think Condoleezza Rice is stupid and incompetent.

 

Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black once held a gavel wishing he could use it on Blacks and Jews.

 

So many Americans don’t seem to fully grasp the Pelosi disaster that just befell America. The woman is dangerous and as Socialist as they get. Nancy Pelosi does not believe in a government of the people, by the people; she wants the government to take full domination of Americans lives and has a voting record to prove it.

 

Let’s take a look at Nan’s voting record and beliefs so every reader can see what they’re in for over the next two years—and possibly more if Democrats are not defeated in 2008.

 

According to a site named On The Issues—(Every Political Leader is on ontheissues.org)—Nancy Pelosi scored very high with a 60% rating on tolerance for different life-style choices. She’s pro-gay marriage. So are divorce lawyers who will make a fortune on every gay marriage they are encouraging.

 

On standards for morality and safety in America that would be enforced by the government Nancy Pelosi scored only 40%. On free market competition and personal responsibility for financial matters the Congresswoman scored 60%.

 

Here’s the worst: when it came to believing the government should equally redistribute America’s wealth, deciding what is good for Americans—(not Americans themselves)—and the government should resolve how much money is spent on the people without the people making the decision; Nancy Pelosi scored low at 40% believing the U.S. government should have full jurisdiction of all American’s money—(except liberals and Hollywood)—lives, choices and the government.

 

If that doesn’t worry you, you deserve what Mrs. Pelosi is going to do to you.

 

Below is a chart of Nancy’s voting record and beliefs from On The Issues at ontheissues.org. This is a legitimate site tracking politicians left, right, liberal, conservative, libertarian without bias. Nancy is listed under THE CANDIDATE.

 

 

 

 

= Strongly Support    = Support    = No Opinion    = Oppose    = Strongly Oppose
 

Personal Issues

The candidate

Hard-core Liberal

Hard-core Libertarian

Hard-Core Conservative

Hard-Core Authoritarian

Abortion Is A  Woman's Right
 

Strongly Support

Sexual Orientation Protected By Civil Rights Law
 

Strongly Support

Organized Prayer In Public Schools
 

Strongly Oppose

Death Penalty
 

Strongly Oppose

Mandatory "Three Strikes" Sentencing Laws
 

Strongly Oppose

Drug Use Is Immoral: Enforce Laws Against It
 

Strongly Oppose

Allow Churches To Provide Welfare Services
 

Strongly Oppose

Link Human Rights To Trade With China
 

Strongly Support

 

= Strongly Support    = Support    = No Opinion    = Oppose    = Strongly Oppose

Economic Issues

The Candidate

Hard-core Liberal

Hard-core Libertarian

Hard-Core Conservative

Hard-Core Authoritarian

Require Companies To Hire More Women/Minorities
 

Strongly Support