BILL CLINTON DEFENDS HIS FAILURE OVER NOT CAPTURING BIN LADEN:
HE BLAMES BUSH FOE EIGHT YEARS OF CLINTON MISTAKES
BY LISA RICHARDS
September 25, 2006
Did you watch
the buffoon of bosom feel on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace? Ole Billy
Bob Clinton got red-faced with anger at Chris Wallace for asking Clinton “Why
didn’t you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president? There’s a new book out…called
The Looming Tower. It talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out
of Somalia in 1993, bin Laden said, 'I’ve seen the frailty
and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops.' Then there
was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the Cole.”
That did it.
Clinton does not like having his failures and inadequacies laid out publicly.
The Hill Billy uproar ignited into full-blown, eye-bulging anger.
Wallace went
on to state bin Laden “separated his leaders, spread them around, because he expected an attack, and there was no response.”
Oh my, that was
a dig right through the jugular. Bill Clinton never responded to Black Hawke Down. He let our men die without retribution.
“Ok;”
Clinton red-faced and put out beyond arrogance said. “Let’s talk about
it.” The ex-president snidely remarked. “I’m being asked this on the FOX network.” He implied defensively
as if CNN would never do this to him. Actually, that’s true.
Oh boy. Fox really
is the evil empire.
Clinton
was so irritated his teeth were gnashing. He cut Wallace off consistently throughout the entire one hour lie-athon. At the
beginning of the interview, Wallace asked Clinton about the $7 billion he pledged
this week at the Global Initiative Forum in New York. Clinton
bragged like an over inflated stuffed shirt in need of a good ass pin-popping.
Oh how Clinton
loved describing how he is ending AIDS, poverty, injustice to blacks by evil whites, and the fact he is the only president
ever to raise the economy. Someone should tell him the economy was crap when he left office and Bush raised it higher than
any administration or economy in U.S. history since 1963.
Bill Clinton
was so happy to brag about his money raising charities, but Wallace had to ask the questions millions of e-mailers demanded
Wallace pose to the ex-president who had many chances to catch bin Laden yet did nothing.
Clinton
complained this was a Fox News ploy and that ABC had sent in a “right-winger” to “run their little pathway
to 9/11,” falsely claiming it was "based on the 9/11 Commission Report,
with three things asserted against me directly!”
Clinton
was beat red-faced in Wallace’s face with fingers pointing and eyes flinty with such anger he was on the verge of spontaneous
combustion.
I wish.
Clinton
went on indignantly stating he tried for eight years to get bin Laden and failed. “But at least I tried” he claimed
even though he failed.
That made as
much sense as electing the ass President of the United States
for eight, long years.
Is Clinton
kidding? Is he seriously kidding? How many times has Dick Morris stated he sat in the Oval Office with Clinton
and Gore when the CIA told the whore and the bore bin Laden was a threat, a danger and must be taken into custody or taken
out. And how many times did the imbecile of non-inhale-ment refuse to take the would-be invader and killer of 3,000 American
souls?
That’s
right, so many times you’ve lost count.
And how often
have you heard CIA Analyst and Clinton Administration advisor Mansoor Ijaz of Benadoor Associates publicly describe his imploring
Clinton and Gore to take the known terrorist involved in the 1993 World Trade attack and many other attacks on the U.S. before
he attacked America?
Yeah, you lost
count of those testimonies against the liars of liberalistic lampoon too.
Well, September
24, 2006 we all got to hear Clinton describe his many attempts to capture
the guy who was handed to him on a silver platter by Mansoor Ijaz, the guy who worked out the deal with the Saudis to hand
bin Laden over to U.S. authorities.
Ijaz has stated
publicly that Clinton and Gore insisted bin Laden was not a threat to the U.S.
Dick Morris states the same claims as Ijaz.
Mansoor Ijaz
and Dick Morris were never mentioned in the interview, not even by Wallace which I find annoying since Ijaz and Morris can
state they tried to get Clinton to cooperate and take the terrorist.
According to
Clinton he wanted to stay in Somalia
after the Black Hawke went down but Republicans made him pull out.
Oh bull! You
were the president; you could have said no I’m not pulling out, I’m staying and bombing the bejeezes out of Somalia
for what they did to my people.
Monica and her
services to the president were of imperative presidential urgency. The president needed sex.
The entire interview
was like watching the Rosenberg’s declare they never sold those top secret A-Bomb secrets to the Russians even though
they were caught red-handed with the files.
I noticed something
interesting about Clinton: he completely goes off when an interviewer remains
calm, asking rational questions. Chris Wallace remained pleasant and respectful of the Oval office playboy, never once accusing,
rather asking legitimate questions Americans want answers to.
Clinton
lost control and never regained it. He doesn’t work well with calm people, which explains the Jerry Springer free-for-all
lamp tossing escapades widely documented between Hill and Bill. Clinton seems
to love brawls not decorum.
Too bad he and
Hillary don’t live together anymore, they could have had a lamp-throwing fest that night to rid Bill of his aggression
toward Wallace, Bush and Republicans.
Wallace told
Clinton bin Laden accused him [Clinton] and the country of displaying weakness
by pulling out of Somalia, and that it made us look weak.
Clinton
denied the accusation from bin Laden stating: “But it wouldn’t have shown the weakness if we’d left right
away, but he [bin Laden] wasn’t involved in that [Somalia].
That’s just a bunch of bull.
You should know
bull.
Clinton
went on to insist the entire Somalia incident was about a
Muslim Warlord named Mohammad Adid who murdered 22 Pakistani troops. Clinton claimed our mission there was purely humanitarian,
not to get bin Laden or keep him or anyone out. Then he insisted Adid was not a religious fanatic.
Oh, that’s
why he murdered 22 Pakistani Muslim troops. That’s why he murdered American soldiers by blowing them out of the skies
and torturing them to death in the streets Islam-style.
Not a fanatic
my perfectly toned ass.
Clinton
insisted Al Qaeda was nowhere in Somalia. If you believe that
I have a warehouse full of free spinach for anyone willing to eat it.
There was one
consistent theme throughout the entire interview: Richard Clarke. Bill Clinton injected Clarke’s name into every answer
with such praise I was beginning to wonder if I’m worshiping the wrong Jesus.
Wallace tried
to quote the 9/11 Commission Report, but Clinton would have none of it. Richard Clarke was far superior to anything a Senate
Armed Committee could perform. “The U.S. government
took the threat seriously,” Wallace said referring to bin Laden and Bush. “But not in the sense of mustering anything
like the kind of effort that would be gathered to confront an enemy of first, second, or even third rank.”
“That’s
not true!” Clinton spewed with venom. “Let’s look at what Richard
Clarke said.”
On and on and
on Clinton sited Richard Clarke whom Clinton
angrily said was demoted by Bush.
Clarke is an
idiot. He deserved to be demoted and “downgraded.” Condi Rice is smarter; she deserved Clarke’s job. Oops;
a black girl with more degrees than Einstein got Clarke’s job. Ouch!
Clinton
went on to smear Republicans and Neo-Cons—the new Conservatives known as Reaganites. That would be me. Clinton
said the Neo-Cons stopped him from capturing bin Laden. They stopped the CIA whom Clinton
said he authorized to kill the terrorist. Then Clinton stated there never was
a “comprehensive anti-terror-operation” until he was president.
You mean Reagan
never got our hostages back from the Ayatollah? Reagan never negotiated a plan with Colonial North to free our people through
the controversial Iran/Contra deal? That wasn’t popular, but it was an anti-terror plan. You mean Reagan never ended
Communism, a form of terror? You mean Bush 41 never went to war in the Middle East with Saddam to free
Kuwait from Saddam’s invasion?
For the record,
that war was won and Saddam would have been taken out and Kuwaitis would never have been enslaved had Colin Powell shut his
yap and not told General Schwarzkopf and President Bush to halt operations to Baghdad.
George W. Bush
picked up where his father did fail by not listening to Powell and the UN, and
did what Clinton never continued when he promised to finish what Bush never finished. Bush 43 ended one of the most brutal
regimes in world history, continuing to fight terror Clinton never had the guts
to tackle.
Clinton told
Wallace if he were president he would have more than 20,000 troops in Iraq
hunting bin Laden and would kill him.
Really? Sounds
like you have a plan. Care to share it with Bush, or are you too jealous because he got a war and you didn’t?
Clinton
never implemented anti-terror plans to protect the U.S. and
he knows it. Clinton never retaliated for the 93’ bombing of the World Trade center, the Khobar Towers, the U.S./Kenyan
Embassy, the U.S.S. Cole and Black Hawke and Somalia’s attacks on our troops.
Last night, Chris
Wallace caught the ex-president off guard, put him on the spot deservedly and Clinton
said everything and anything to make himself the hero of anti-terror policy.
Sorry but George
W. Bush implemented the entire anti-terror policy and strategy. Bush implemented Homeland Security and the Patriot Act. Clinton
refused to do such things because he’s politically correct and too concerned with violating Civil Rights of criminals.
Clinton allowed Janet Reno to ignore Mohammad Atta who got away, killing 3,000
people. Clinton could have overrode her, demanding Atta’s files be hacked.
He didn’t. 3,000 innocent human beings died.
Clinton
stated over and over that he tried and Bush had nine months but never tried.
Apparently Bush
ignored bin Laden’s letter which stated:
Dear Mr. President,
On September 11, 2001, at 8:43 a.m., I am
going to begin attacking the U.S. through Mohammad Atta
whom Janet Reno let go. My 19 men will hijack your
planes and begin flying them into the World Trade
Center, the Pentagon and the Capitol’s buildings. I intend to kill millions. I hate you; I want to kill you all. Na na
na na na na!
Try to stop me
if you can you hey-seed hick in ten gallon hat!
Yours truly,
Osama bin Laden
Terrorist extraordinaire.
Now, if the Dick
Clarke input and “I tried” crap wasn’t enough, Clinton accused
Wallace of a set-up because Rupert Murdoch—Wallace’s boss—is “supporting my work in climate change”
and viewers are going to be angry to know the boss of a conservative network is donating to Clintons
environmental work.
Huh? Who cares
what Rupert Murdoch does with his money? If he’s an environmentalist no one cares. It’s Murdoch’s money;
he can spend it on whatever he wants.
Clinton
accused Wallace of purposely setting him up to rouse his anger and “to move my bones.” Wallace simply asked questions.
Nothing out of the ordinary, just interview questions, but Clinton feels he’s
exempt from anyone questioning his presidency and lack of leadership.
Clinton
let Wallace know Wallace was upsetting him. “You guys [Fox News and Republicans] try to create the impression [he did
nothing to stop bin Laden], when all you have to do is read—[you know what’s coming]—Richard Clarke’s
book.”
The book was
trashier than a Kitty Kelly exposé. It actually refutes Clinton’s claims
that it exonerates him. The book was useless except to my cats. No explanation needed there.
Clinton
insisted he was obsessed with Osama bin Laden and that’s why Republicans and conservatives blame him for 9/11.
Huh? Obsessed
with bin Laden? Would someone please call Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and Jennifer Flowers? I think they can define Clinton’s
obsessions. And would someone call Dick Morris and Mansoor Ijaz and ask them why the obsessed with bin Laden president refused
to take the terrorist from the Saudis in 1996? I would love to hear Clinton explain
that knowledge.
“Ah trod.”
One thing Clinton
said that was proof of his laziness and refusal to take responsibility was his saying bin Laden is Bush’s problem now,
“that’s the great thing about being a former president.”
You bastard!
Oh really. You
have no responsibility any longer? Bush should answer for your mistakes Mr. Clinton? You lying crook. That is typical of a
criminal letting other people hold the bag as he escapes.
Chris Wallace’s
interview was excellent in that it was an eye-popping window in to the mind and heart of a liar to busy having sex with everyone
except his lesbian wife to catch terrorists.
Copywrite
September25, 2006 Lisa Richards