THE WORLD AS IT SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT BE ACCORDING TO LISA RICHARDS

THE CLINTON CHRONICLES
Home
TRIBUTE PAGE
THE RACE FOR 2008
CONSERVATIVE VERSUS LIBERAL NEWS
IDIOT OF THE WEEK
THE WAR ON TERROR
SENATE IDIOTS
CONGRESS: LEGISLATIVE LUNACY
THE CLINTON CHRONICLES
THE KENNEDY PAGE
THE HOWARD DEAN PAGE
FENCE-JUMPERS, GATE-CRASHERS, AND THIEVES
WHAT'S WRONG IN AMERICA
AMERICAN MORALITY LOST
FRUITS AND NUTS
HILARITY IN A WORLD OF DISPARITY
LIBERALISM IS COMMUNISM
AMERICAN TRAITORS
THE SUPREME COURT
THE DANGERS OF MULTI-CULTURALISM AND ISLAM

HILLBILLIES, WHORES, AND PLANTATIONS

NUTS TOSSED OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST

 

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 1, 2007

 

Yes, I’m talking about the Clintons again. As if it weren’t enough that we had to hear about Bill exposing “his” in the Oval Office for eight long years, now we have Hillary trying to shove her big tush back in the doors of the White House while attempting to rob every American tax-payer of more money for lazy parents.

 

According to Madame Romanov, she would like every child born on U.S. soil to receive a check for $5,000 dollars, which will be put into an account collecting interest—off tax-payers of course—until the child reaches age 18. Those children Americans will have to forcibly hand money over to could include children of illegal aliens. Hillary did not state children of illegals would be included in her proposal, but anyone with a brain knows illegally born children will be bought for votes if Clinton’s proposal can make it to Washington.

 

How lovely. It’s not enough the free-loading thieves of America crash our borders stealing our jobs and paychecks every April 15th, after crossing our lines while dropping babies on our soil in the process of invasion, the Mexican takeover might get paid for illegally birthing brats.

 

If that sounds too harsh for readers, too bad; Hillary Clinton is trying to pick America’s pockets for lazy welfare Hispanic/black/illegal votes.

 

This is also Hillary’s socialist attempt to return America to Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society when women who refused to work for a living were paid by hijacked taxpayers to have babies for a living. Welfare mother’s made a lot of money popping out babies for cash. Hillary wants them to have a chance to do so again.

 

What a nice career for young women: opt out of high school and college; make money getting pregnant; whore yourself for Hillary votes. Don’t all you gals out there dream of aspiring to yearly profitable taxpayer pregnancies? Gosh, women of suffrage would be so proud.

 

Oh, here’s the best part: it’s estimated this nutty sham could cost Americans $20 billion in taxes. We already pay $50 billion annually in welfare taxes to illegals alone. That would up the welfare lottery to $70 billion more annually, and that doesn’t include all welfare recipients.

 

After readers have calmed down, read the next paragraph.

According to Hillary, she “like[s] the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that would grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they would be able to access it to go to college.”

This is welfare every way you look at it and slice it.  These kids are not going to go to college if this attempt at a LBJ bill gets passed. The kids will cash the money and use it as down payments on black sports cars with dark tinted windows and 4X5 foot speakers in the trunks blaring voodoo drumbeats to loud, pounding bass rhythms.

P.S., this is also European Socialism. Europe is a welfare haven and many E.U. states are broke as a result of post WWII welfare for life. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher thought the E.U. was crazy to keep welfare for life for anyone in Britain. Then again, I’m speaking of the great Iron Lady who had more class than Miss Manners. Hillary is no lady; a Hun in pantsuits, but no lady.

I wonder if Maggie Thatcher would like to run against Hillary.

Hillary claims her plan will enable future 18 year-olds to put down-payments on homes with the $8,512 dollars in interest accumulated over 18 years.

Where does anyone in America put eight grand down on a home; Mo and Curly’s trailer Park in the hills of Eastern Kentucky?  18 years from now, eight grand will be worth two cents Hillary. But taxpayers will have the privilege of saying they spent $20 billion yearly to purchase homes for the children of the lazy.

Hillary also claims her plan will help these paid-for-by-the-taxpayers children pay for college tuition. Yeah, right. Hillary Clinton, do you have any idea what college tuition costs per semester in the U.S.? Do you understand most colleges now cost $150,000 dollars for a Bachelor’s degree? Do you realize the five to six books per class cost $50 to $150 dollars per book? Did taxpayers pay for Chelsea’s degree? Do you give a flying flip that eight grand in 18 years probably won’t buy one semester’s worth of books?

Again; this is Hillary’s way of reinstituting LBJ’s Great Society back into America and what author Marvin Olasky stated in The Tragedy of American Compassion as  something considered degradation by all races before 1960: “Until the 1960’s,” Olasky said,  “the public dole was humiliation. Soon young men would be told that shining shoes was demeaning, and that accepting government subsidy meant a person could at least keep his dignity.”

 

So it starts again. Convincing a certain group of Americans they never have to work for a living when there are taxpayers to pay the way.

 

In FDR’s New Legacy is the Life of the Lie, author Jacob G. Hornberger stated: the “New deal [enacted by FDR] ‘rejected’ America’s foundations of the values of freedom and equality making many live what might be called ‘the life of the lie’ or the life that denies reality.” If people would wake up, they would realize Hillary Clinton is trying to deny blacks and Hispanics a normal life in order to become president.

 

And for the record, it was Madame Romanov’s husband Bill who was forced to sign the August 22, 1996 bill titled Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act—PRWORA—into law, dismantling the deteriorating welfare system. According to the Administration For Children & Families, Clinton’s PRWORA demanded twenty-five percent of all welfare recipients in each state enter the workforce after two years assistance. Single parents had to work twenty hours a week for the first year of welfare assistance, thirty hours the second year, becoming full-fledged members of the work-force.

 

Now presidential hopeful Hillary wants Americans to pay for the birthing of other people’s children. While you’re at it Madame Romanov, why not just give the kids the title papers to every American taxpayers home—minus the mortgage payments of course—we wouldn’t want welfare recipients to feel they owe anyone a living.

 

 According to Professor Thomas Sowell, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute: “there is a fundamental difference between seeking the truth and scoring points. In politics, the truth is strictly optional and that also seems to be true in parts of the media” In Sowell’s article “Myths of the Rich,” he speaks of how the media and politicians convince minorities that they are poor and always will be. Therein lays the brainwashing-into-welfare.

 

Hillary and all liberals need poor people. Liberals will be out of jobs if Americans—especially black and Hispanics on welfare—wake up and realize liberals do not want them rich, educated and holding their heads up high. Liberals need ghettoed poor blacks and Hispanics voting democrat; liberals need uneducated blacks and Hispanics to never rise up out of poverty liberals like Hillary keep them in for the race-card vote.

 

Now Hillary wants as many American—and don’t doubt illegal children will be included—born into welfare as possible. It’s the only way she can grab the low-income black and Hispanic vote and take over America.

 

Hey, Britney, maybe if you promise Hillary a vote, she’ll buy your kids off K-Fed.

 

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TO CHRIS WALLACE;

DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW HARD IT IS TO CATCH A GUY WHEN YOUR PANTS ARE DOWN?

 

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 30, 2006

 

And so the saga continues.

 

Hillary is angry Fox News’ Chris Wallace questioning her husband’s ethics concerning Osama bin Laden. She is further miffed over that black chick—her name is Condi and she’s brilliant—tactfully putting the usurping New York Senator in her place by stating President Bush and his administration have worked tirelessly on the bin Laden case.

 

Unlike Bill Clinton who worked tirelessly to procure women.

 

Bush has not! My husband chased that terrorist all over the planet and bin Laden refused to slow down so Bill could catch up!

 

What Bill Clinton should have told Chris Wallace was: “I tried. I tried for eight, long years to get bin Laden. But do you have any idea Chris, just how difficult it is to chase after someone when your pants are down around your knees?”

 

At least the ex-president would have been telling the truth versus lying like that well-used Oval Office rug.

 

The Hill is not going to let the Bill-bashing go. Clintons have difficulty parting with things—White House antiques, women, Vince Foster’s shoes, National Security Vault documents, and the limelight. They just can’t let go.

 

I don’t know who to thank more, Chris Wallace or Hillary Clinton for refusing to drop the interview that ended Sunday September 24, 2006 with Bill Clinton screaming his way out of Fox’s Washington Headquarters. Apparently Bill’s staff was supposed to jump in and beat the crap out of Chris for questioning Clinton’s failing actions.

 

Chris, have you learned nothing from your father? You’re supposed to fall all over a Clinton like a fat girl in a blue Gap dress. 

 

Thanks to Chris Wallace’s acting like a real journalist, unlike David Gregory who would have broke out the Kleenex and wept along with Clinton on how difficult it is to be an over aged liar with a full head of hair, the Clinton’s are showing their colors—they are after all the first black couple.

 

This has to be choking Jimmy Carter around his Lilly-livered, skinny neck: his limelight addiction has been blacked-out and defused by an even dumber, sneakier, storytelling prevaricator of allegorical crap.

 

Jimmy Carter snubbed our ally and friend the Shah of Iran and let the Ayatollah take over a democracy. Jimmy Carter screwed us over with gas shortages and high pump prices far surpassing anything we pay today. Then he made assassination of world leaders illegal giving Castro, Chavez, the Ayatollah, Ahmadinejad, everyone who ever ran Haiti, those Eastern European dictators, Asad, Arafat, Qadaffi, etc., live to destroy the world while Carter got the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

Oh, did I mention Cuba and rafting sports? Whoever touches Key West wins a free house in Miami.

 

Reagan only destroyed Communism and ripped a wall out of the middle of East and Western Europe.

 

All that Commie ass-kissing and Middle Eastern destruction of democracy was supposed to keep the little peanut picker’s face in the cameras for life. Then that hick from Hope came along and had sex with his staff. Damn; why didn’t Carter think of that?

 

Well, the Clinton’s aren’t going to take this defamation of their cut-throat characters lying down—this time. No way. Hillary’s going to let America know just how hard her husband tried to pull his pants up every time he heard her thunderous voice howling in the halls. After all, this is the man who can dodge a lamp at light speed. This is the President who was able to phone world leaders while Monica performed her diplomatic duties. Let’s just see Bush try that!

 

Hillary, you forgot to mention what a good Christian your husband is. After sex with that woman, he attended church, bible in hand, weekly for the cameras. And George W. Bush thinks he’s so smart because he accepted Jesus as his Lord and Savior? Yeah well, Hillary Clinton’s husband accepted sexual favors by a whore for favors.

 

So there!

 

Now that you’ve read this ask yourself: do you really want that big, blonde lesbian and her whoring husband back in the White House for another eight years of lamp-tossing, booty-calling and looting?

 

The only happy people would be the Palestinians who would be offered 100 percent of Israel.

 Copywrite September 30, 2006

BILL CLINTON DEFENDS HIS FAILURE OVER NOT CAPTURING BIN LADEN:

HE BLAMES BUSH FOE EIGHT YEARS OF CLINTON MISTAKES

 

 

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 25, 2006

 

Did you watch the buffoon of bosom feel on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace? Ole Billy Bob Clinton got red-faced with anger at Chris Wallace for asking Clinton “Why didn’t you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president? There’s a new book out…called The Looming Tower. It talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out of Somalia in 1993, bin Laden said, 'I’ve seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops.' Then there was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the Cole.”

 

That did it. Clinton does not like having his failures and inadequacies laid out publicly. The Hill Billy uproar ignited into full-blown, eye-bulging anger.

 

Wallace went on to state bin Laden “separated his leaders, spread them around, because he expected an attack, and there was no response.”

 

Oh my, that was a dig right through the jugular. Bill Clinton never responded to Black Hawke Down. He let our men die without retribution.

 

“Ok;” Clinton red-faced and put out beyond arrogance said. “Let’s talk about it.” The ex-president snidely remarked. “I’m being asked this on the FOX network.” He implied defensively as if CNN would never do this to him. Actually, that’s true.

 

Oh boy. Fox really is the evil empire.

 

Clinton was so irritated his teeth were gnashing. He cut Wallace off consistently throughout the entire one hour lie-athon. At the beginning of the interview, Wallace asked Clinton about the $7 billion he pledged this week at the Global Initiative Forum in New York. Clinton bragged like an over inflated stuffed shirt in need of a good ass pin-popping.

 

Oh how Clinton loved describing how he is ending AIDS, poverty, injustice to blacks by evil whites, and the fact he is the only president ever to raise the economy. Someone should tell him the economy was crap when he left office and Bush raised it higher than any administration or economy in U.S. history since 1963.

 

Bill Clinton was so happy to brag about his money raising charities, but Wallace had to ask the questions millions of e-mailers demanded Wallace pose to the ex-president who had many chances to catch bin Laden yet did nothing.

 

Clinton complained this was a Fox News ploy and that ABC had sent in a “right-winger” to “run their little pathway to 9/11,” falsely claiming it was "based on the 9/11 Commission Report, with three things asserted against me directly!”

 

Clinton was beat red-faced in Wallace’s face with fingers pointing and eyes flinty with such anger he was on the verge of spontaneous combustion.

 

I wish.

 

Clinton went on indignantly stating he tried for eight years to get bin Laden and failed. “But at least I tried” he claimed even though he failed.

 

That made as much sense as electing the ass President of the United States for eight, long years.

 

Is Clinton kidding? Is he seriously kidding? How many times has Dick Morris stated he sat in the Oval Office with Clinton and Gore when the CIA told the whore and the bore bin Laden was a threat, a danger and must be taken into custody or taken out. And how many times did the imbecile of non-inhale-ment refuse to take the would-be invader and killer of 3,000 American souls?

 

That’s right, so many times you’ve lost count.

 

And how often have you heard CIA Analyst and Clinton Administration advisor Mansoor Ijaz of Benadoor Associates publicly describe his imploring Clinton and Gore to take the known terrorist involved in the 1993 World Trade attack and many other attacks on the U.S. before he attacked America?

 

Yeah, you lost count of those testimonies against the liars of liberalistic lampoon too.

 

Well, September 24, 2006  we all got to hear Clinton describe his many attempts to capture the guy who was handed to him on a silver platter by Mansoor Ijaz, the guy who worked out the deal with the Saudis to hand bin Laden over to U.S. authorities.

 

Ijaz has stated publicly that Clinton and Gore insisted bin Laden was not a threat to the U.S. Dick Morris states the same claims as Ijaz.

 

Mansoor Ijaz and Dick Morris were never mentioned in the interview, not even by Wallace which I find annoying since Ijaz and Morris can state they tried to get Clinton to cooperate and take the terrorist.

 

According to Clinton he wanted to stay in Somalia after the Black Hawke went down but Republicans made him pull out.

 

Oh bull! You were the president; you could have said no I’m not pulling out, I’m staying and bombing the bejeezes out of Somalia for what they did to my people.

 

Monica and her services to the president were of imperative presidential urgency. The president needed sex.

 

The entire interview was like watching the Rosenberg’s declare they never sold those top secret A-Bomb secrets to the Russians even though they were caught red-handed with the files.

 

I noticed something interesting about Clinton: he completely goes off when an interviewer remains calm, asking rational questions. Chris Wallace remained pleasant and respectful of the Oval office playboy, never once accusing, rather asking legitimate questions Americans want answers to.

 

Clinton lost control and never regained it. He doesn’t work well with calm people, which explains the Jerry Springer free-for-all lamp tossing escapades widely documented between Hill and Bill. Clinton seems to love brawls not decorum.

 

Too bad he and Hillary don’t live together anymore, they could have had a lamp-throwing fest that night to rid Bill of his aggression toward Wallace, Bush and Republicans.

 

Wallace told Clinton bin Laden accused him [Clinton] and the country of displaying weakness by pulling out of Somalia, and that it made us look weak.

 

Clinton denied the accusation from bin Laden stating: “But it wouldn’t have shown the weakness if we’d left right away, but he [bin Laden] wasn’t involved in that [Somalia]. That’s just a bunch of bull.

 

You should know bull.

 

Clinton went on to insist the entire Somalia incident was about a Muslim Warlord named Mohammad Adid who murdered 22 Pakistani troops. Clinton claimed our mission there was purely humanitarian, not to get bin Laden or keep him or anyone out. Then he insisted Adid was not a religious fanatic.

 

Oh, that’s why he murdered 22 Pakistani Muslim troops. That’s why he murdered American soldiers by blowing them out of the skies and torturing them to death in the streets Islam-style.

 

Not a fanatic my perfectly toned ass.

 

Clinton insisted Al Qaeda was nowhere in Somalia. If you believe that I have a warehouse full of free spinach for anyone willing to eat it.

 

There was one consistent theme throughout the entire interview: Richard Clarke. Bill Clinton injected Clarke’s name into every answer with such praise I was beginning to wonder if I’m worshiping the wrong Jesus.

 

Wallace tried to quote the 9/11 Commission Report, but Clinton would have none of it. Richard Clarke was far superior to anything a Senate Armed Committee could perform. “The U.S. government took the threat seriously,” Wallace said referring to bin Laden and Bush. “But not in the sense of mustering anything like the kind of effort that would be gathered to confront an enemy of first, second, or even third rank.”

 

“That’s not true!” Clinton spewed with venom. “Let’s look at what Richard Clarke said.”

 

On and on and on Clinton sited Richard Clarke whom Clinton angrily said was demoted by Bush.

 

Clarke is an idiot. He deserved to be demoted and “downgraded.” Condi Rice is smarter; she deserved Clarke’s job. Oops; a black girl with more degrees than Einstein got Clarke’s job. Ouch!

 

Clinton went on to smear Republicans and Neo-Cons—the new Conservatives known as Reaganites. That would be me. Clinton said the Neo-Cons stopped him from capturing bin Laden. They stopped the CIA whom Clinton said he authorized to kill the terrorist. Then Clinton stated there never was a “comprehensive anti-terror-operation” until he was president.

 

You mean Reagan never got our hostages back from the Ayatollah? Reagan never negotiated a plan with Colonial North to free our people through the controversial Iran/Contra deal? That wasn’t popular, but it was an anti-terror plan. You mean Reagan never ended Communism, a form of terror? You mean Bush 41 never went to war in the Middle East with Saddam to free Kuwait from Saddam’s invasion?

 

For the record, that war was won and Saddam would have been taken out and Kuwaitis would never have been enslaved had Colin Powell shut his yap and not told General Schwarzkopf and President Bush to halt operations to Baghdad. 

 

George W. Bush picked up where his father did fail by not listening to Powell and the UN, and did what Clinton never continued when he promised to finish what Bush never finished. Bush 43 ended one of the most brutal regimes in world history, continuing to fight terror Clinton never had the guts to tackle.

 

Clinton told Wallace if he were president he would have more than 20,000 troops in Iraq hunting bin Laden and would kill him.

 

Really? Sounds like you have a plan. Care to share it with Bush, or are you too jealous because he got a war and you didn’t?

 

Clinton never implemented anti-terror plans to protect the U.S. and he knows it. Clinton never retaliated for the 93’ bombing of the World Trade center, the Khobar Towers, the U.S./Kenyan Embassy, the U.S.S. Cole and Black Hawke and Somalia’s attacks on our troops.

 

Last night, Chris Wallace caught the ex-president off guard, put him on the spot deservedly and Clinton said everything and anything to make himself the hero of anti-terror policy.

 

Sorry but George W. Bush implemented the entire anti-terror policy and strategy. Bush implemented Homeland Security and the Patriot Act. Clinton refused to do such things because he’s politically correct and too concerned with violating Civil Rights of criminals. Clinton allowed Janet Reno to ignore Mohammad Atta who got away, killing 3,000 people. Clinton could have overrode her, demanding Atta’s files be hacked. He didn’t. 3,000 innocent human beings died.

 

Clinton stated over and over that he tried and Bush had nine months but never tried.

 

Apparently Bush ignored bin Laden’s letter which stated:

 

Dear Mr. President,

         

On September 11, 2001, at 8:43 a.m., I am going to begin attacking the U.S. through Mohammad Atta whom Janet Reno let go. My 19 men will hijack your planes and begin flying them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the Capitol’s buildings. I intend to kill millions. I hate you; I want to kill you all. Na na na na na na!

 

Try to stop me if you can you hey-seed hick in ten gallon hat!

 

Yours truly,

 

Osama bin Laden Terrorist extraordinaire.

 

Now, if the Dick Clarke input and “I tried” crap wasn’t enough, Clinton accused Wallace of a set-up because Rupert Murdoch—Wallace’s boss—is “supporting my work in climate change” and viewers are going to be angry to know the boss of a conservative network is donating to Clintons environmental work.

 

Huh? Who cares what Rupert Murdoch does with his money? If he’s an environmentalist no one cares. It’s Murdoch’s money; he can spend it on whatever he wants.

 

Clinton accused Wallace of purposely setting him up to rouse his anger and “to move my bones.” Wallace simply asked questions. Nothing out of the ordinary, just interview questions, but Clinton feels he’s exempt from anyone questioning his presidency and lack of leadership.

 

Clinton let Wallace know Wallace was upsetting him. “You guys [Fox News and Republicans] try to create the impression [he did nothing to stop bin Laden], when all you have to do is read—[you know what’s coming]—Richard Clarke’s book.”

 

The book was trashier than a Kitty Kelly exposé. It actually refutes Clinton’s claims that it exonerates him. The book was useless except to my cats. No explanation needed there.

 

Clinton insisted he was obsessed with Osama bin Laden and that’s why Republicans and conservatives blame him for 9/11.

 

Huh? Obsessed with bin Laden? Would someone please call Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and Jennifer Flowers? I think they can define Clinton’s obsessions. And would someone call Dick Morris and Mansoor Ijaz and ask them why the obsessed with bin Laden president refused to take the terrorist from the Saudis in 1996? I would love to hear Clinton explain that knowledge.

 

“Ah trod.”

 

One thing Clinton said that was proof of his laziness and refusal to take responsibility was his saying bin Laden is Bush’s problem now, “that’s the great thing about being a former president.”

 

You bastard!

 

Oh really. You have no responsibility any longer? Bush should answer for your mistakes Mr. Clinton? You lying crook. That is typical of a criminal letting other people hold the bag as he escapes.

 

Chris Wallace’s interview was excellent in that it was an eye-popping window in to the mind and heart of a liar to busy having sex with everyone except his lesbian wife to catch terrorists.[1]

 Copywrite September25, 2006 Lisa Richards

 



[1] All information gathered from Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. Transcript-William Jefferson Clinton interview with Chris Wallace. September 24, 2006. 6 p.m. EST. Fox News Sunday. Fox News Channel. foxnewsonline@foxnews.com. Fox news LLC. Associated Press. http://www.foxnews.com/printer-friendly_story/0,3566,215397,00.htm1.

SLUNG WITH THE WIND

 

By Lisa Richards

January 23, 2006

 

According to Madame Hillary “Romanov” Clinton, “the White House is run like a plantation, and you know what I’m talking about.”

 

No Madame Clinton, I do not, so why don’t you and your big, fat liberal mouth come out and just call all Republicans what you believe we are: a bunch of black-haters with glorious slavery-memories of the past, rippin’ food out of black babies mouths in the South after we purposely broke the Levees in order to drown every Southern black, because we want the South white, white, white and racist white.

 

Of course Senator Clinton does not have the guts to actually say it that way because she knows it’s not true. But the wicked witch of Washington has to try to brainwash black Americans into believing white Republicans hate blacks and want a return to “the plantation.”

 

That’s why the white Republican’s—a.k.a. the Abolitionists—fought so hard to end slavery, rescue slaves and hide them; sneak them into Canada, and free them after a bloody war between the states. Remember Abe Lincoln, the guy who freed the black man; The white Republican who wrote the Emancipation Proclamation; The man who was assassinated for abolishing slavery and keeping th ecountry whole? It’s so easy to forget when you have such incredible heroes like the great extortionist Jesse Jackson, and white-hating racists like Louis Farrakhan and the Black Panthers to look up to.

 

Madame Clinton also noted that the Bush administration would “go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country.”

 

First of all, the usurping Senator from Illinois/Arkansas/New York—she had to choose the state that she can use to buy her way into the White House—might want to avoid hurling boulders at glass houses, especially when it was her husband’s administration that ran the best little whore house in Washington D.C., refused to imprison Osama bin Laden when the Saudi’s offered him up on a silver platter, refused to retaliate for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in which bin Laden was linked, the slaughter of our troops in Magu Dishu, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole that took the lives of American sailors, the Kobar Towers, the U.S. embassy in Tanzania. Oh and don’t forget going to war in Bosnia and Croatia in order to cover up the fact that he was uncovering a girl out of her blue dress. Then there’s the infamous bombing of an aspirin factory in which Clinton claimed he missed his target—Osama bin Laden—when trying to hit the terrorist.

 

He never missed the woman under the Oval Office desk.

 

And, Madame Clinton, there is your husband’s lying under oath to the Senate about the staff laying under him and his refusal to let a women testify at his trial, which subsequently got him impeached. But he’s a democrat, so impeachment was thrown out.

 

Then we have the White Water scandal, The Tyson Chicken scandal, Hillary’s Black Panther days supporting the group’s racial hating of whites and desire to rape and kill as many as possible. Let us not forget her supporting the PLO and pretending to be a Jew all the while hugging Suha Arafat gratefully when she claimed Jews poisoned Palestinian children.

 

My all-time favorite Hillary scandal is the strange murder of her close friend and alleged lover—that’s a big alleged—Vince Foster. How did he drag his lifeless, shoeless body across D.C. to that field?

 

Scandal after scandal and Senator Clinton has the sauce to claim George W. Bush has the worst administration in history.

 

All George W. Bush did was drink too much when he was younger, but decided to give up booze for Jesus and a life as a dedicated Born Again, Evangelical Christian, husband, and father; he freed 50 million people from slavery and slaughter, destroyed the Taliban in retaliation for destroying two American cities and 3,000 innocent souls; put two blacks in the position of Secretary of the State, made a Mexican Attorney General and another Secretary of transportation, and stated America will never turn its back on Israel. Case in point: Arafat was banned from the White House and not offered 90% of Israel’s land as Bill Clinton did. George W. Bush also has made the economy stronger than it was in the 70’s, 80’s, and Bill Clinton’s 90’s, and won more votes—popular and electoral—than any President in U.S. history. All the while keeping his pants zipped and his nose clean.

 

The only mistake George Bush is ma